Prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in oncological surgery (review of the literature)
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-89-94
Abstract
The multifactorial nature of the problem of venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC) in oncological surgery underlies that, despite the widespread introduction of risk criteria and routine thromboprophylaxis in practice, it is not possible to completely prevent these postoperative complications. Ensuring the highest level of patient safety for VTEC is one of the priority tasks of the surgical service specialists. Surgical practice requires the development of reasonable criteria for prolonged medical prophylaxis of VTEC and the introduction of methods for the early detection of latent venous thrombosis.
About the Authors
A. M. Karsanov
North-Ossetian State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Karsanov Alan M. - Cand of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 3, North Ossetia State Medical Academy.
40, Pushkinskaya str., Vladikavkaz, 362019.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. A. Kulchiev
North-Ossetian State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Kultchiev Akhsarbek A. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 3, North Ossetian State Medical Academy.
40, Pushkinskaya str., Vladikavkaz, 362019.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. K. Khestanov
North-Ossetian State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Khestanov Artur K. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 3, North Ossetian State Medical Academy.
40, Pushkinskaya str., Vladikavkaz, 362019.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. A. Morozov
North-Ossetian State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Morozov Aleksey A. - Cand of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 3, North Ossetian State Medical Academy.
40, Pushkinskaya str., Vladikavkaz, 362019.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. V. Tigiev
North-Ossetian State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tigiev Severyan V. - Cand of Sci. (Med.), Assistant of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 3, North Ossetian State Medical Academy.
40, Pushkinskaya str., Vladikavkaz, 362019.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Riondino S., Ferroni P., Zanzotto F. M. et al. Predicting VTE in cancer patients: candidate biomarkers and risk assessment models. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(1):95.
2. Beal E. W., Tumin D., Chakedis J. et al. Which patients require extended thromboprophylaxis after colectomy? Modeling risk and assessing indications for post-discharge pharmacoprophylaxis. World J. Surg. 2018;42(7):2242-2251.
3. Frere C., Doucet L., Farge D. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2016;9(6):535-539.
4. Mandala M., Falanga А., Roila F. Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann. Oncol. 2011;22(6):85-92.
5. Kobayashi T. Prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism based on Japanese clinical guides. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2017;58(7): 875-882.
6. Rossijskie klinicheskie rekomendacii po diagnostike, lecheniyu i profilak-tike venoznyh tromboembolicheskih oslozhnenij (VTEO). Flebologiya. 2015;9(4):2-52. (In Russ.).
7. Scotte F., Elalamy I., Mayeur D., Meyer G. Physicians' decision about long-term thromboprophylaxis in cancer outpatients: CAT AXIS, a case vignette study on clinical practice in France. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(6):2049-2056.
8. Key N. S., Khorana A. A., Kuderer N. M. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American society of clinical oncology practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019; JCO1901461. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01461.
9. Gould M. K., Garcia D. A., Wren S. M. et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American college of chest physicians evidencebased clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2):227-277.
10. Zaghiyan K. N, Sax H. C., Miraflor E. Timing of chemical thromboprophylaxis and deep vein thrombosis in major colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 2016;264(4):632-639.
11. Emoto S., Nozawa H., Kawai K. et al. Venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2019;42(9):863-873.
12. Walker A. J., West J., Card T. R. et al. Variation in the risk of venous thromboembolism in people with colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study from England. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2014;12(5): 641-649.
13. Nelson D. W., Simianu V. V., Bastawrous A. L. et al. Thromboembolic complications and prophylaxis patterns in colorectal surgery. SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(8):712-720.
14. Steele S. R., Simianu V. V., Flum D. R. Misclassification of acceptable venous thromboembolism prophylaxis leading to flawed inferences and recommendations regarding prevention efforts-Reply. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(2):198-199.
15. Shermock K. M., Lau B. D., Haut E. R. et al. Patterns of non-administration of ordered doses of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: implications for novel intervention strategies. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66311.
16. Kwon S., Meissner M., Symons R. et al. Perioperative pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011;213(5):596-603.
17. Cipolle M. D., Wojcik R., Seislove E. et al. The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. J. Trauma. 2002;52(3):453-462.
18. Samuel S., Patel N., McGuire M. F. et al. Analysis of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients undergoing standard versus routine ultrasonography. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2019;47(2):209-215.
19. Malhotra A. K., Goldberg S. R., McLay L. et al. DVT surveillance program in the ICU: analysis of cost-effectiveness. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106793.
20. Dietch Z. C., Edwards B. L., Thames M. et al. Rate of lower-extremity ultrasonography in trauma patients is associated with rate of deep venous thrombosis but not pulmonary embolism. Surgery. 2015;158(2):379-385.
21. Chopra V., Ratz D., Kuhn L. et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2014;12(6):847-854.
22. Greene M. T., Flanders S. A., Woller S. C. et al. The association between PICC use and venous thromboembolism in upper and lower extremities. Am. J. Med. 2015;128(9):986-993.
23. Li J., Halaszynski T. Neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks in patients taking anticoagulant or thromboprophylactic drugs: challenges and solutions. Local Reg. Anesth. 2015;4(8):21-32.
24. Shaikh S. I., Kumari R. V., Hegade G., Marutheesh M. Perioperative Considerations and Management of Patients Receiving Anticoagulants. Anesth. Essays Res. 2017;11(1):10-16.
25. Toledano T. H., Kondal D., Kahn S. R., Tagalakis V. The occurrence of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients following major surgery. Thromb. Res. 2013;131(1):1-5.
26. Rasmussen M. S., Jorgensen L. N., Wille-Jorgensen P. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD004318.
27. Alsubaie H., Leggett C., Lambert P. et al. Diagnosis of VTE postdischarge for major abdominal and pelvic oncologic surgery: implications for a change in practice. Can. J. Surg. 2015;58(5):305-311.
28. White C. K., Langholtz J., Burns Z. T. et al. Readmission rates due to venous thromboembolism in cancer patients after abdominopelvic surgery, a retrospective chart review. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(4):993-999.
29. Fleming F. J., Kim M. J., Salloum R. M. et al. How much do we need to worry about venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge? A study of colorectal surgery patients using the national surgical quality improvement program database. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2010;53(10):1355-1360.
30. El-Dhuwaib Y., Selvasekar C., Corless D. J. et al. Venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(4):385-394.
31. Park J. S., Ahn E. J., Ko D. D. et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneal pressure and position changes on respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic colectomy. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2012;63(5):419-424.
32. Ozdemir-van Brunschot D., van Laarhoven K., Scheffer G.-J. et al. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg. Endosc. 2016;30:2049-2065.
33. Verheijen P. M., Stevenson A. R., Stitz R. W. et al. Prolonged use of thromboprophylaxis may not be necessary in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(6):755-759.
34. Hata T., Yasui M., Ikeda M. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant prophylaxis for prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in Japanese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2019;3(5):568-575.
Review
For citations:
Karsanov A.M., Kulchiev A.A., Khestanov A.K., Morozov A.A., Tigiev S.V. Prevention of venous thromboembolic complications in oncological surgery (review of the literature). Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(1):89-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-89-94
Views:
568
Email this article 