Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent inguinal hernias
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-46-50
Abstract
The OBJECTIVE was to evaluate the technical feasibility of endoscopic hernioplasty in recurrent inguinal hernia. METHODS AND MATERIALS. Personal experience of the authors covers more than 10 000 laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasties operated in 1996-2018. This paper analyzes the results of 127 patients treated for recurrent inguinal hernias after primary laparoscopic approach, reoperated using minimally-invasive surgical techniques.
RESULTS. Possible causes of relapses after primary hernioplasty, both after TAPP and TEP techniques, were analyzed. The technical features of performing repeated laparoscopic interventions in this group of patients were considered. The developed and implemented technical methods, the tactics of the surgical treatment, the choice of the prostheses' type and size used in patients with various kinds of recurrent inguinal hernias were described. Results of the study included an analysis of the treatment while recommendations on the technique of repeated surgical intervention of recurrent hernias were formulated. The safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic repeated surgery for recurrent inguinal hernias were shown. CONCLUSION. Laparoscopic approach to hernioplasty in recurrent inguinal hernia is equally effective after open and endoscopic primary repair. An increase in the number of hernioplasty for recurrent inguinal hernias with non-adhesive mesh grafts is promising. Contraindications to redo laparoscopic intervention may include high risk of general anesthesia and severe scarring in the lower abdomen.
About the Authors
V. V. StrizheletskyRussian Federation
Strizheletsky Valeriy V. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head physician of St George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital, professor of Hospital Surgery Department, Saint-Petersburg University.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
G. M. Rutenburg
Russian Federation
Rutenburg Grigoriy M. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief surgeon St George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital, professor of Faculty Surgery Department, Pavlov University.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. A. Makarov
Russian Federation
Makarov Sergey A. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), chief of the Surgical department № 3, St. George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
I. I. Suvorov
Russian Federation
Suvorov Igor I. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy head physician on surgery, St. George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
R. B. Ramazanov
Russian Federation
Ramazanov Rashid B. - chief of the Surgical department № 1, St. George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. B. Guslev
Russian Federation
Guslev Aleksander B. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Hospital of the Russian Academy of Science, surgeon, lecturer in the Faculty Surgery Department, Saint-Petersburg University.
7/9, Universitetskaya embankment, Saint Petersburg, 199034.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. N. Luchkin
Russian Federation
Luchkin Aleksey N. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Surgical department № 1, St. George the Great Martyr Municipal Hospital, surgeon, associate professor in the Faculty Surgery Department, Pavlov University.
Saint Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Miserez M., Peeters E., Aufenacker T., Bouillot J. L., Campanelli G., Conze J., Fortelny R., Heikkinen T., Jorgensen L. N., Kukleta J., Morales-Conde S., Nordin P., Schumpelick V., Smedberg S., Smietanski M., Weber G., Simons M. P. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18:151-163.
2. Ostrovskii V. K., Filimonchev I. E. Faktory riska retsidivov pakhovykh gryzh // Khirurgia: Zhurnal im. N. I. Pirogova. 2010;3:45. (In Russ.).
3. Agrawal A., Avill R. Mesh migration following repair of inguinal hernia: a case report and review of literature. Hernia. 2006;10:79-82.
4. Bisgaard T. Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann. Surg. 2008;247:707-711.
5. Eklund A. S., Montgomery A., Rasmussen C., Sandbue R. P., Bergk-vist L. A., Rudberg C. R. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann. Surg. 2009;249:33-38.
6. Bobo Z., Nan W., Qin Q., Tao W., Jianguo L., Xianli H. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extra-peritoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res. 2014 Dec;192(2):409-420. Doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.082.
7. Zhebrovskii V. V. Khirurgiya gryzh zhivota. Moscow, Med. inform. agentstvo. 2005:384. (In Russ.).
8. Guslev A. B., Cherepanov D. F., Rutenburg G. M., El'tsin S. S. Tekhnicheskie osobennosti laparoskopicheskoi proteziruyushchei gernioplastikipakhovykh gryzh. Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova. 2017;176(3):77-80. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Strizheletsky V.V., Rutenburg G.M., Makarov S.A., Suvorov I.I., Ramazanov R.B., Guslev A.B., Luchkin A.N. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent inguinal hernias. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(1):46-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-46-50