Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of the results of treatment of trans- and suprasphincteric anal fistulae by thermo-obliteration of fistula track with diode laser or monopolar electrocoagulation

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-4-36-43

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the results of two methods of thermo-obliteration of the fistula track by diode laser or monopolar electrocoagulation in patients with trans- and suprasphincteric anal fistulas.

Methods and materials. 52 patients (men - 40, women - 12) were included in the study. 29 patients underwent laser coagulation (Laser group) and 23 patients underwent monopolar electrocoagulation (ME group) of fistula track combined with closure of internal fistula opening. Mean age of patients in Laser group was (46±13) years, in ME group - (41±12) years. In the Laser group, 11 (38 %) patients had suprasphincteric fistulae, and 18 (62 %) had transsphincteric fistulae passing through a superficial or deep portion of the external anal sphincter. In the ME group, 9 (39.1 %) patients had an suprasphincteric fistula and 14 (60.9 %) had a transsphincteric fistulae. The minimal period for assessing the healing rate was 2 months after surgery.

Results. The average follow-up period after Laser was (9.5±3.0) (5-18) months, after ME - (12.2±7.3) (2-22) months. Primary healing of fistula in 2 months after surgery was 19/29 (65.5 %; 10 transsphincteric and 9 suprasphincteric fistulas) in the Laser group versus 7/23 (30.4 %; 5 transsphincteric and 1 suprasphincteric fistulas) in the ME group (p<0.05). There were no cases of fecal incontinence development after laser or monopolar coagulation of fistula track.

Conclusion. A comparative analysis of the first results showed that although in both groups, after thermo-obliteration of the fistula track, the frequency of non-healing of fistula exceeds 30 %, in the group where a diode laser was used, the results were statistically significantly better compared to the group of monopolar electrocoagulation (65.5 against 30.4 %).

About the Authors

I. V. Kostarev
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Kostarev Ivan V. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Minimally Invasive Proctology and Pelvic Surgery.

2, Salyama Adilya str., Moscow, 123423


Competing Interests: not


D. O. Kiselev
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Kiselev Dmitrii O. - Postgranduate Student, Doctor of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics.

Moscow

Competing Interests: not


L. A. Blagadarni
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Blagodarni Leonid A. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Coloproctology.

Moscow


Competing Interests: not


E. E. Zharkov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Zharkov Euegne E. - Junior Research Fellow of the Department of General and Reconstructive Coloproctology.

Moscow

Competing Interests: not


A. Yu. Titov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Titov Alexander Yu. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of General and Reconstructive Coloproctology of Ryzhikh.

Moscow


Competing Interests: not


E. E. Bolkvadze
Municipal Clinical Hospital No.15 named O.M. Filatov
Russian Federation

Bolkvadze Eteri E. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Proctology.

Moscow

Competing Interests: not


A. A. Mudrov
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Mudrov Andrey A. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of of the Department of Coloproctology.

Moscow


Competing Interests: not


A. V. Matinyan
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology
Russian Federation

Matinyan Anushavan V. - Postgraduate Student, Coloproctologist of the Department of Minimally Invasive Proctology and Pelvic Surgery.

Moscow

Competing Interests: not


References

1. Meinero P. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):417-422. Doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0769-2.

2. Titov A. Yu., Kostarev I. V., Fomenko O. Yu., Mudrov A. A. Opyt video-assistiruemykh operatsii s ushivaniem vnutrennego svishchevogo otverstiya pri khirurgicheskom lechenii ekstrasfinkternykh i vysokikh transsfinkternykh svishchei pryamoi kishki. Koloproktologiya. 2015; 3(53):73-79. (In Russ).

3. Walęga P. VAAFT: a new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas - initial results. Polish Journal of Surgery. 2014;86(1):7-10.

4. Zarin M. VAAFT: Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment; Bringing revolution in Fistula treatment. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(5):1233-1235. Doi: 10.12669/pjms.315.6836.

5. Wilhelm A. A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15:445-449. Doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0.

6. Matinyan A. V., Kostarev I. V. et al. Lechenie svishey pryamoy kishki metodom lasernoy termoobliteracii svishevogo khoda (sistematicheskiy obzor). Koloproktologiya. 2019;3(69):7-15. (In Russ).

7. Dulcev Yu. V., Salavov K. N. Paraproktit. Moscow, Medicina, 1981:5-44. (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Kostarev I.V., Kiselev D.O., Blagadarni L.A., Zharkov E.E., Titov A.Yu., Bolkvadze E.E., Mudrov A.A., Matinyan A.V. Comparative analysis of the results of treatment of trans- and suprasphincteric anal fistulae by thermo-obliteration of fistula track with diode laser or monopolar electrocoagulation. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(4):36-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-4-36-43

Views: 740


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)