Predicting for mortality rate using regression analysis in patient with burn injury
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-5-21-29
Abstract
The objective was to develop a methodology for predicting death in patients with burn injury using regression analysis methods.
Methods and Materials. The analysis of the results of treatment of 330 burned with a shock injury, hospitalized in the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation of the Department of Thermal Lesions of Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze research institute of emergency medicine in the period 2013–2019.
Results. In the course of the study, 52 indicators were identified that characterized the condition of the victim with burn injury in the dynamics of treatment measures. To build a predictive model, only statistically significant parameters (p<0.05) were used, which were used to build a model of logistic regression. The final algorithm included 18 predictors. The model allows predicting a positive outcome of treatment and the likelihood of a fatal outcome with an accuracy of 93 and 87 % respectively.
Conclusion. The use of a multivariate mathematical model made it possible to develop a method for predicting a fatal outcome, taking into account the peculiarities of the pathogenesis of burn disease and the principles of therapeutic measures in the first three days after injury. The use of linear regression analysis using new indicators of thermal injury in a retrospective cohort of 330 patients allowed us to achieve a high predictive value.
About the Authors
O. O. Zavorotniy
Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Surgeon of Thermal Injuries Unit,
Saint Petersburg
E. V. Zinoviev
Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Thermal Injuries Unit,
Saint Petersburg
D. V. Kostyakov
Saint-Petersburg I. I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Research Fellow of Thermal Injuries Unit,
Saint Petersburg
References
1. World Health Organization. Burns. 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns (accessed: 20.07.2020). (In Russ.).
2. Evdokimov V. I., Kourov A. S. Genesis of scientific research on burn injury (analysis of domestic journal articles in 2005–2017). Medico-biological and socio-psychological problems of safety in emergency situations. 2018;4:108–120. (In Russ.).
3. Hussain A., Dunn K. Burn related mortality in Greater Manchester: 11-year review of Regional Coronial Department Data. Burns. 2015;41: 225–234.
4. Jack F., Woods C., Quinlan C. S., Shelley O. P. Predicting Mortality in Severe Burns – What Is the Score?: Evaluation and Comparison of 4 Mortality Prediction Scores in an Irish Population. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;4:606.
5. Douglas H. E., Ratcliffe A., Sandhu R. Comparison of mortality prediction models in burns ICU patients in Pinderfields Hospital over 3 years. Burns. 2015;41:49–52.
6. Matveenko A. V. Predicting the outcome of thermal burns. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2009;168(6):101–104. (In Russ.).
7. Fistal E. Ya., Guryanov V. G., Soloshenko V. V. Mathematical model of predicting the outcome in victims of methane-coal mixture explosions. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal «Emergency Medical Care». 2016;3:43–47. (In Russ.).
8. Riley R. D., Ensor J., Snell K. I., Debray T. P. External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges. BJM. 2016;41:353.
9. Pantet O., Faouzi M., Brusselaers N., Vernay A., Berger M. M. Comparison of mortality prediction models and validation of SAPS II in critically ill burns patients. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016;41:123.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Zavorotniy O.O., Zinoviev E.V., Kostyakov D.V. Predicting for mortality rate using regression analysis in patient with burn injury. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(5):21-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-5-21-29
Views:
684
Email this article 