FEATURES OF REHABILITATION OF THE PATIENTS AFTER NONINFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-2-66-72
Abstract
The authors analyzed noninfectious complications (dislocation of endoprosthesis head, periprosthesis fractures) in 8 patients out of 40 with hip arthroplasty. There were estimated clinical, biomechanical results and quality of life of the patients. An application of the external fixator-orthezes should be recommended in order to prevent complications of hip replacement. The wearing of brace is considered to be reasonable after revision interventions.
About the Authors
V. A. Neverov
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. I. Miroshnichenko
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. P. Miroshnichenko
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Загородний Н. В. Эндопротезирование крупных суставов в РФ // Научно-практическая конференция «Вреденовские чтения». СПб., 2013.
2. Нуждин В. И., Попова Т. П., Кудинов О. А. Тотальное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава // Вестн. травматол. и ортопед. им. Н. Н. Приорова. 1999. № 1. С. 5-7.
3. Филиппенко В. А., Танькут В. А., Масандика С. Х. Ошибки и осложнения при эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава и их профилактика // Вестн. травматол. и ортопед. им. Н. Н. Приорова. 1998. № 3. С. 37-40.
4. Clayton M. L., Thirupathi R. G. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Management by special brace in selected patients // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1983. № 177. P. 154-159.
5. Harris W. H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end result study using a new method of result evaluation // J. Bone Joint Surg. 1969. Vol. 51-B. P. 737-755.
6. Harris W. H., Mulroy W. F. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1996. Vol. 78. P. 325-330.
7. Irie S., Iida H., Nishimatsu H. et al. A test model of hip brace for prevention of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (Zetton Band) // Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2002. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 253-256.
8. Khann M. A., O’ Driscoll M. Fractures of the femur during total hip replacement and their management // J. Bone Joint Surg. 1977. Vol. 59B. P. 36-41.
9. Mont M. A., Maar D. C. Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients // J. Arthroplasty. 1994. № 9. P. 511-519.
10. Mont M. A., Maar D. C., Krackow K. A., Hungerford D. S. Hoop-stress fractures of the ipsilateral femur during hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. 1992. Vol. 74B. P. 257-260.
11. Murloy W. F., Estok D., Harris W. H. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation cementing techniques // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1995. Vol. 77A. P. 1845-1852.
12. Poss R., Wolker P., Spector M. et al. Strategies for improving fixation femoral components in total hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. 1988. Vol. 235. P. 181-194.
13. Schwartz J. T.Jr, Mayer J. G., Engh C. A. Femoral fracture during noncemented total hip arthroplasty // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1989. Vol. 71A. P. 1135-1142.
14. Stuchin S. A. Femoral shaft fracture in porous and press-fit total hip arthroplasty // Orthop. Rev. 1990. Vol. 19. P. 153-159.
15. Taylor M. M., Meyers M. H., Harvery J. P. Intraoperative femur fractures during total hip replacement // Clin. Orthop. 1978. Vol. 137. P. 96-103.
Review
For citations:
Neverov V.A., Miroshnichenko O.I., Miroshnichenko A.P. FEATURES OF REHABILITATION OF THE PATIENTS AFTER NONINFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(2):66-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-2-66-72
Views:
504
Email this article 