Prediction of pulmonary air leak after lobectomies
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-1-33-40
Abstract
The OBJECTIVE was to identify prognostic factors of long-term air leak after lobectomies based on the analysis of the main preoperative and surgical clinical and functional indicators.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. A retrospective study included 71 patients who underwent lung resection in the volume of lobectomy for lung cancer. The patients were divided into three groups - group 1 (n=42, 59 %) - air leak through the drains stopped within a day after surgery; group 2 (n=10, 14 %) - the duration of air leak from the pleural cavity from 1 to 5 days; group 3 (n=19, 27 %) the duration of air leak more than 5 days after surgery.
RESULTS. The average values of the main clinical, surgical and functional indicators, such as the frequency of concomitant COPD, the severity of its course, smoking status, access (thoracotomy / thoracoscopy) in the three groups were almost the same. The difference in the average value of DLCO was characterized by the greatest tendency to reliability: the longer the pulmonary air leak was, the lower the values of this indicator turned out to be. Correlation analysis revealed a noticeable feedback between the long-term pulmonary air leak and the preoperative level of FEV1 (r=-0.59), a direct relationship between the level of FEV1 and DLCO (r=0.51), as well as a noticeable feedback between the long-term pulmonary air leak and the level of DLCO (r=-0.61) and a direct moderate relationship between the pulmonary air leak and the time spent on the stair climbing test (r=0.38).
CONCLUSIONS. The combination of a low level of FEV1, a low level of DLCO and a long duration of the stair climbing test makes it possible to assess the risk of prolonged pulmonary air leak as significant and take this into account during the surgical intervention.
About the Authors
A. L. AkopovRussian Federation
Andrey L. Akopov - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery with Clinic, Head of the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. S. Agishev
Russian Federation
Alexey S. Agishev - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Research Fellow of the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
R. P. Mishra
Russian Federation
Radezh P. Mishra - Postgraduate Student of the Department of Hospital Surgery with Clinic, Thoracic Surgeon, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
M. G. Kovalev
Russian Federation
Mikhail G. Kovalev - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
E. V. Parshin
Russian Federation
Evney V. Parshin - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. Yu. Dvoreckiy
Russian Federation
Sergey Yu. Dvoreckiy - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Associate Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery with Clinic, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Z. A. Zaripova
Russian Federation
Zulfiya A. Zaripova - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Yu. D. Rabik
Russian Federation
Yulia D. Rabik - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Functional Diagnostics № 2, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
R. D. Skvortsova
Russian Federation
Ruth D. Skvortsova - Doctor of Functional Diagnostics, Head of the Department of Respiratory Therapy of the Research Institute of Interstitial and Orphan Diseases, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. A. Obukhova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Obukhova - Postgraduate Student of the Department of Functional Diagnostics, Pavlov University.
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Pischik V. G., Zinchenko E. I., Obornev A. D., Kovalenko A. I. Videoassisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection: experience of 246 operations // Khirurgiya. 2016;(1):10-15. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20161210-15.
2. French D. G., Plourde M., Henteleff H., Mujoomdar A., Bethune D. Optimal management of postoperative parenchymal air leaks // J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(32):S3789-S3798. Doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.05.
3. Cerfolio R. J. Chest tube management after pulmonary resection // Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2002;(12):507-527. Doi: 10.1016/s1052-3359(02)00015-7.
4. Drewbrook C., Das S., Mousadoust D., Nasir B., Yee J., McGuire A. Incidence Risk and Independent Predictors of Prolonged Air Leak in 269 Consecutive Pulmonary Resection Patients over Nine Months: A SingleCenter Retrospective Cohort Study // Open Journal of Thoracic Surgery. 2016;(6):33-46. Doi: 10.4236/ojts.2016.64006.
5. Pompili C. Miserocchi G. Air leak after lung resection: pathophysiology and patients'implications // J Thorac Dis. 2016;(8):S46-S54. Doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.08.
6. Elsayed H., McShane J., Shackcloth M. Air leaks following pulmonary resection for lung cancer: is it a patient or surgeon related problem? // Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012;(94):422-427. Doi: 10.13O8/003588412X13171221592258.
7. Dugan K. C., Laxmanan B., Murgu S., Hogarth D. K. Management of Persistent Air Leaks // CHEST. 2017;152(2):417-423. Doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.020.
8. Akopov A. L., Gorbunkov S. D., Romanikhin A. I., Kovalev M. G. Selection of patients with concomitant chronic obstructive disease for anatomical resections in lung cancer (review of literature) // Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2019;178(5):121-126. (In Russ.).
9. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Available at: https://goldcopd.org/ (accessed: 20.01.2022).
10. Roy E., Rheault J., Pigeon M. A., Ugalde P. A., Racine C., Simard S., Chouinard G., Lippens A., Lacasse Y., Maltais F. Lung cancer resection and postoperative outcomes in COPD: A single-center experience // Chro nic Respiratory Disease. 2020;(17):1-8. Doi: 10.1177/1479973120925430.
11. Toneev E. A., Bazarov D. V., Pikin O. V., Charyshkin A. L., Martynov A. A., Lisyutin R. I., Zul'karnyaev A. Sh., Anokhina E. P. Prolonged air leak after lobectomy in lung cancer patients // Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2020;19(1):103-110. Doi: 10.21294/1814-4861-2020-19-1-103-110.
12. Brunelli A., Cassivi S. D., Halgren L. Risk Factors for Prolonged Air Leak After Pulmonary Resection // Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;(20):359-364. Doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.03.00.
13. Pischik V. G., Maslak O. S., Obornev A. D., Zinchenko E. I., Kovalenko A. I. Risk factors for prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resections // Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(3):52-58. Doi: 10.17116/endoskop20202603152
14. Korymasov E. A., Benyan A. S. Air leakage after lung resection // Science and Innovation in Medicine. 2018;4(12):36-40. Doi: 10.35693/25001388-2018-0-4-36-40.
15. Esakov lu. S., Zhestkov K. G., Karmazanovskii G. G., Makeeva-Malinovskaia N. Iu. Risk factors for aerostasis failure in case of lung resection // Khirurgiya. 2014;(7):38-43. (In Russ.).
16. Won Ho Kim, Hyung-Chul Lee, Ho-Geol Ryu, Hyun-Kyu Yoon, Chul-Woo Jung. Intraoperative ventilatory leak predicts prolonged air leak after lung resection: A retrospective observational study // PLoS ONE. 12(11):e0187598. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187598.
17. Zhou J., Chen N., Hai Y. External suction versus simple water-seal on chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: an updated metaanalyses // Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;(28):29-36. Doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy216.
18. Brunelli A., Kim A.W., Berger K.I. et al. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: diagnosis and management of lung cancer. 3rd ed. / American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines // Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl.):E166S-E190S. Doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2395.
19. Gorbunkov S. D., Varlamov V. V., Cherny S. M., Lukina O. V., Kiryukhina L. D., Romanikhin A. I., Zinchenko A. V., Akopov A. L. Palliative surgical correction of respiratory insufficiency in diffusive pulmonary emphysema // Khirurgiya. 2017;(10):52-56. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20171052-56.
20. Gorbunkov S. D., Varlamov V. V., Chernyi S. M., Zaripova Z. A., Gich-kin A. Yu., Lukina O. V., Kiryukhina L. D., Kovalev M. G., Romanikhin A. I., Akopov A. L. Surgical correction of respiratory failure in patients with diffuse pulmonary emphysema who underwent long-term oxygen therapy // Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(4):71-74. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-4-71-74.
21. Kiryukhina L. D., Nefedova N. G., Kokorina E. V. et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of limiting exercise tolerance in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis // Tuberculosis and socially significant diseases. 2021;(1):14-20. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=44859998 (accessed: 20.01.2022).
Review
For citations:
Akopov A.L., Agishev A.S., Mishra R.P., Kovalev M.G., Parshin E.V., Dvoreckiy S.Yu., Zaripova Z.A., Rabik Yu.D., Skvortsova R.D., Obukhova A.A. Prediction of pulmonary air leak after lobectomies. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2022;181(1):33-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-1-33-40