Local complications of acute pancreatitis and methods of their instrumental diagnosis
S. I. Remizov,
A. V. Andreev,
V. M. Durleshter,
S. A. Gabriel,
Yu. S. Kuznetsov,
O. V. Zasyadko,
G. A. Levchenko Abstract
The literature review considers the characteristics of local complications in the classifications of acute pancreatitis, as well as analyzed the effectiveness of modern methods of their diagnosis. Understanding the morphology of changes occurring in the pancreas and parapancreatic tissue in acute pancreatitis is of great importance, as it often determines the tactics of surgical treatment. Modern diagnostic methods for local complications of acute pancreatitis, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and cholangiopancreatography are highly informative, but the effectiveness of their use depends on the duration of the disease and the type of local complications, which makes to apply the differentiated approach to their use.
About the Authors
S. I. Remizov
Regional Clinical Hospital № 2
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Remizov Stanislav I., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Surgeon of the Department of X-ray Surgical and Ultrasound Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment № 1
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. V. Andreev
Regional Clinical Hospital № 2; Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Andreev Andrei V., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of the X-ray Surgical and Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment № 1, Regional Clinical Hospital № 2, Krasnodar; Professor of the Kuban State Medical University
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. M. Durleshter
Regional Clinical Hospital № 2; Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Durleshter Vladimir M., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Surgery № 3, Kuban State Medical University, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery, Region Clinic Hospital № 2
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. A. Gabriel
Regional Clinical Hospital № 2; Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Gabriel Sergey A., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Chief Physician, Region Clinic Hospital № 2, Professor of the Department of Surgery № 3
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Yu. S. Kuznetsov
Regional Clinical Hospital № 2
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Kuznetsov Yurij S., Surgeon of the Department of Surgery № 5
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
O. V. Zasyadko
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Zasyadko Ol’ga V., Clinical Resident
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
G. A. Levchenko
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Levchenko Grigorij A., Clinical Resident
Krasnodar
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Bagnenko S. F., Savello V. E., Gol’cov V. R. Radiation diagnosis of diseases of the pancreas: acute pancreatitis. Radiation diagnostics and therapy in gastroenterology: national guidelines. Moscow, GEOTAR Medicina, 2014:349–365. (In Russ.).
2. Banks P.A., Bollen T. L., Dervenis C. et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus // Gut. 2013;62(1):102–111. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.
3. Bogdanov S. N., Mukhin A. S., Voloshin V. N., Otdelnov L. A. Issues of acute pancreatitis classification: practical surgeon’s point of view // Perm Medical Journal. 2020;37(1):102–110. DOI: 10.17816/pmj371102-110.
4. Bollen T. L., van Santvoort H. C., Besselink M. G. et al. Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited //Br J Surg. 2008.Vol. 95, №1. P. 6–21. DOI:10.1002/bjs.6010.
5. Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. 9 April, 2008. URL: http://www.pancreasclub.com/resources/Atlanta Classification.pdf (accessed 6.08.2009).
6. Balthazar E. J., Robinson D. L., Megibow A. J., Ranson J. H. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis // Radiology. 1990. Vol. 174, № 2. P. 331–336.
7. Bugiantella W., Rondelli F., Boni M. et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: A review of the interventions // Int J Surg. 2016. Vol. 28, № 1. P. 163–171. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.038.
8. Dellinger E. P., Forsmark C. E., Layer P. et al. Pancreatitis Across Nations Clinical Research and Education Alliance (PANCREA). Determinantbased classification of acute pancreatitis severity: an international multidisciplinary consultation // Ann Surg. 2012. Vol. 256, № 6. P. 875–880. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256f778.
9. Sarr M. G., Banks P.A., Bollen T. L. et al. The new revised classification of acute pancreatitis 2012 // Surg Clin North Am. 2013. Vol. 93, № 3. P. 549–562. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.02.012.
10. Sabo A., Goussous N., Sardana N. et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: a review of multidisciplinary management // JOP. 2015. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 125–135. DOI: 10.6092/1590-8577/2947.
11. Shyu J. Y., Sainani N. I., Sahni V. A. et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: diagnosis, imaging, and intervention // Radiographics. 2014. Vol. 34, № 5. P. 1218–1239. DOI: 10.1148/rg.345130012.
12. Grassedonio E., Toia P., La Grutta L. et al. Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in local complications of acute pancreatitis // Gland Surg. 2019. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 123–132. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.12.07.
13. Chen Y., Jiang Y., Qian W.et al. Endoscopic transpapillary drainage in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome after acute pancreatitis and trauma: long-term outcomes in 31 patients // BMC Gastroenterol. 2019. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 54. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-0977-1.
14. Sureka B., Rai B., Varshney V. K. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is an ideal imaging method to detect infection in pancreatic collections: a brief primer for the gastroenterologist // Cureus. 2022. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 21530. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21530.
15. Багненко С. Ф., Гольцов В. Р., Савелло В. Е., Вашетко Р. В. Классификация острого панкреатита: современное состояние проблемы // Вестник хирургии имени И. И. Грекова. 2015. Т. 174, № 5. С. 86–92. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-5-86-92.
16. Crockett S. D., Wani S., Gardner T. B. et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines Committee. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis // Gastroenterology. 2018. Vol. 154, № 4. P. 1096– 1101. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.032.
17. Triester S. L., Kowdley K. V. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis // J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002. Vol. 34, № 2. Р. 167–176. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200202000-00014.
18. Ardelean M., Şirli R., Sporea I. et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound in the pathology of the pancreas – a monocentric experience // Med. Ultrason. 2014. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 325–331.
19. Cai D., Parajuly S. S., Wang H. et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with conventional ultrasound in acute pancreatitis: Diagnosis and complication monitoring // Exp. Ther. Med. 2016. Vol. 12, № 5. P. 3189–3194. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3760.
20. Wang Y., Li G., Yan K. et al. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions // Eur. Radiol. 2022. Vol. 32, № 3. P. 2060–2069. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08243-8.
21. Sugiyama M., Wada N., Atomi Y. et al. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: value of endoscopic sonography // AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995. Vol. 165, № 4. P. 867–872. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.4.7676983. 22. Mohan B. P. Diagnosis of idiopathic acute pancreatitis: the simpler, the better? // Endoscopy. 2020. Vol. 52, № 11. P. 965–966. DOI: 10.1055/a1191-3053.
22. Prat F., Edery J., Meduri B. et al. Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis // Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001. Vol. 54, № 6. P. 724–729. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.119734.
23. Kotwal V., Talukdar R., Levy M., Vege S. S. Role of endoscopic ultrasound during hospitalization for acute pancreatitis // World J. Gastroenterol. 2010. Vol. 16, № 39. P. 4888–4891. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i39.4888.
24. Canlas K. R., Branch M. S. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute pancreatitis // World J. Gastroenterol. 2007. Vol. 13, № 47. P. 6314–6320. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6314.
25. Араблинский А. В., Титов М. Ю. КТ и МРТ в диагностике фазового течения панкреонекроза (обзор литературы) // Медицинская визуализация. 2022. Т. 26, № 2. С. 139–153. DOI: 10.24835/1607-0763-1110.
26. Morgan D. E., Baron T. H., Smith J. K. et al. Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US // Radiology. 2017. Vol. 203, № 3. P. 773–778. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169703.
27. Binit S., Kalpana B., Yashwant P., Ankur A. Imaging lexicon for acute pancreatitis: 2012 Atlanta Classification revisited // Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf.) 2015. 2016. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 16–23. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gov036.
28. Nadkarni N.A., Kotwal V., Sarr M.G., Swaroop Vege S. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: endoscopic stent or surgeon’s knife? // Pancreas. 2015. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 16–22. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000216.
Supplementary files
|
1. Сопроводительное письмо | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Other | |
Download
(1MB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Remizov S.I., Andreev A.V., Durleshter V.M., Gabriel S.A., Kuznetsov Yu.S., Zasyadko O.V., Levchenko G.A. Local complications of acute pancreatitis and methods of their instrumental diagnosis. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2023;182(3):72-76. (In Russ.)
Views:
717
Email this article 