Evaluation of the effectiveness of a new method of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Rectal prolapse is a common condition, in which there are conflicting opinions about the optimal surgical treatment.
The OBJECTIVE was to improve the results of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse by developing a new method of surgical intervention using domestic implants and lasers.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. The clinical part of the research covered the period from 2013 to 2023; in total, the results of operations in 102 patients with rectal prolapse of II–III degree were analyzed.
RESULTS. The article presents the first clinical results of the proposed method of rectopexy in rectal prolapse of II–III degree. Due to the use of laser technologies and composite material on top of a mesh prosthesis, the new method made it possible to achieve stable hemostasis in the area of surgery, as well as to prevent the development of a local adhesive process and scar deformation in the area of fixation of the intestine with a prosthesis.
CONCLUSION. In general, the developed version of rectopexy made it possible to reduce the frequency of long-term postoperative complications requiring additional surgical measures or (and) significantly affecting the quality of life of patients from 34.0 to 10.2 %, which ensured the improvement in the proportion of achieved good results of operations from 34.0 to 69.4 % and the reduction in the frequency of unsatisfactory results from 24.5 to 8.2 %.
About the Authors
K. A. AkilovUzbekistan
Akilov Khabibulla A., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Rector
Tashkent
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. E. Rustamov
Uzbekistan
Rustamov Abdusamad E., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Proctology Department of the multidisciplinary clinic
Tashkent
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. Sh. Sapaev
Uzbekistan
Sapaev Duschan Sh., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery of Urgench branch
28, Al-Khorazmi str., Urgench, 220100
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–1505.
2. Funahashi K, Kurihara A, Miura Y, Ushigome M, Kaneko T, Kagami S, Yoshino Y, Koda T, Nagashima Y, Yoshida K, Sakai Y. What is the recommended procedure for recurrent rectal prolapse? A retrospective cohort study in a single Japanese institution. Surg Today. 2021 Jun;51(6):954-961. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02190-5.
3. Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1339–1346.
4. Abbott D, Atere-Roberts N, Williams A, Oteng-Ntim E, Chappell LC. Obstetric anal sphincter injury. BMJ.2010;341:c3414.
5. Jarry J, Peycru T, Shekher M, Faucheron JL. An uncommon surgical disease. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:395–396.
6. Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Scheele J, Farke S, Bruch HP. Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:8–14.
7. Loygue J, Nordlinger B, Cunci O, Malafosse M, Huguet C, Parc R. Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:356-359.
8. Solari S, Martellucci J, Ascanelli S, Sturiale A, Annicchiarico A. Predictive factors for functional failure of ventral mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Dec;26(12):973-979.
9. Smart NJ, Pathak S, Boorman P, Daniels IR. Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:650–654.
10. Ahmad M, Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Mercer-Jones M. The role of biologics in pelvic floor surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14 Suppl 3:19–23.
Review
For citations:
Akilov K.A., Rustamov A.E., Sapaev D.Sh. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a new method of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2023;182(3):47-53. (In Russ.)