Comparative effectiveness of small bowel decompression methods in patients with benign small bowel obstruction: results of a multicenter non-randomized controlled retrospective study
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-2-59-70
Abstract
Introduction. The success of treatment of patients with acute intestinal obstruction is determined by many factors, including the correction of intra-abdominal hypertension and endotoxicosis through intraoperative decompression of the small intestine. The absence of a convincing evidence base in domestic practice in favor of choosing a specific method of probe decompression of the intestine in patients with acute intestinal obstruction served as the basis for this comparative study.
The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of small intestinal decompression methods in patients with benign forms of intestinal obstruction.
Methods and materials. This work was carried out in the format of a multicenter cohort retrospective study, which included an analysis of the treatment results in 315 patients operated with benign forms of intestinal obstruction, who underwent one of 3 intestinal decompression methods. Comparison groups were formed using an optimal matching procedure to avoid the influence of selected confounders on the outcome. The immediate results of treatment were assessed.
Results. The choice between simple nasogastric drainage and insertion of a tube through the ligament of Treitz does not affect rather the rate of adequate peristalsis restoration in the postoperative period, nor the frequency and structure of postoperative complications and deaths. On the contrary, the installation of a long intestinal tube does not accelerate the recovery of peristalsis, since in patients with a nasogastric tube, adequate intestinal activity was recorded on average a day earlier. No effect of nasointestinal intubation on the frequency and structure of non-lethal complications was found, which couldn’t be said about postoperative mortality, which was the highest in the group of patients with long intestinal tubes. At the same time, the most common cause of death was associated with the development of an intra-abdominal complication, while such a trend was not observed among patients with short tubes.
Conclusion. The installation of long intestinal tubes for intestinal decompression in patients with acute intestinal obstruction was associated with the highest mortality due to an increase in the number of intra-abdominal complications. It is impossible to make a clear choice between drainage of the initial parts of the small intestine or isolated installation of a tube in the stomach based on the data obtained.
About the Authors
B. V. SiguaRussian Federation
Sigua Badri V., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Head of the Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Education
2, Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, 197341
A. E. Demko
Russian Federation
Demko Andrey E., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific
3, lit. A, Budapeshtskaya str., Saint Petersburg, 192242
S. V. Petrov
Russian Federation
Petrov Sergey V., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Professor of the Department of Operative and Clinical Surgery with Topographic Anatomy named after S. A. Simbirtsev, North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov, Chief Physician, City Hospital of the Holy Martyr Elizabeth
47, Piskarevsky ave., Saint Petersburg, 195067,
14, lit. A, Vavilovyh str., Saint Petersburg, 195257
V. А. Samarcev
Russian Federation
Samarcev Vladimir A., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery
2, Kim str., Perm, 614107
A. A. Zavrazhnov
Russian Federation
Zavrazhnov Anatoliy A., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Chief Physician
56, Liteyny ave., Saint Petersburg, 191014
P. A. Kotkov
Russian Federation
Kotkov Pavel A., Cand. of Sci. (Med), Assistant of the Department of General Surgery, Institute of Medical Education, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Surgeon of Surgical Department № 2, City Hospital of the Holy Martyr Elizabeth
2, Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, 197341,
14, lit. A, Vavilovyh str., Saint Petersburg, 195257
I. A. Solov’ev
Russian Federation
Solov’ev Ivan A., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery
56, Liteyny ave., Saint Petersburg, 191014
E. V. Nishnevich
Russian Federation
Nishnevich Evgeniy V., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery
189, Volgogradskaya str., Yekaterinburg, 620102
I. V. Mikhin
Russian Federation
Mikhin Igor V., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery
1, Pavshikh Bortsov sq., Volgograd, 400131
I. Ia. Bondarevskiy
Russian Federation
Bondarevskiy Ilya Ia., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Treatment
70, Vorovsky str., Chelyabinsk, 454048
A. V. Glebova
Russian Federation
Glebova Anna V., Cand. of Sci. (Med), Surgeon
56, Liteyny ave., Saint Petersburg, 191014
M. P. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Kuznetsova Marina P., Cand. of Sci. (Med), Surgeon
2, Kim str., Perm, 614107
A. A. Kurkov
Russian Federation
Kurkov Aleksey A., Cand. of Sci. (Med), Assistant of the Department of Faculty Surgery with Endoscopy Course named after I. I. Grekov
47, Piskarevsky ave., Saint Petersburg, 195067
V. P. Zemlyanoy
Russian Federation
Zemlyanoy Vycheslav P., Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery with Endoscopy Course named after I. Grekov,
47, Piskarevsky ave., Saint Petersburg, 195067
References
1. Babkova I. V., Larichev S. E., Sazhin A. V. et al. Acute non-tumor intestinal obstruction. National clinical guidelines, 2021. (In Russ.).
2. Popandopulo K. I., Isakhanyan K.A., Bazlov S. B. et al. The influence of different methods of abdominal decompression on the dynamics of intraabdominal pressure in the early postoperative period in patients with secondary widespread peritonitis: an observational study. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2023;30(3):44–55. https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-3-44-55. (In Russ.).
3. Aliev S.A., Aliev E. S. Nasointestinal intubation in surgery of acute intestinal obstruction and peritonitis: past, present and future. Surgery. Journal named after N. I. Pirogov. 2021;10:92–99. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202110192. (In Russ.).
4. Timerbulatov V. M., Timerbulatov Sh. V., Fayazov R. R. et al. Diagnosis and choice of treatment method for intra-abdominal hypertension of abdominal compartment syndrome. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2019;74(3):210–215. https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1080. (In Russ.).
5. Zharikov A. N., Lubyansky V. G., Aliev A. R. Assessment and surgical correction of intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with postoperative peritonitis. Clinical and experimental surgery. 2022;10(1(35)):98–107. (In Russ.).
6. Belyaeva O. A., Ivanchenko R. V. Surgical tactics and feasibility of using nasointestinal intubation, microjejunostomy, early enteral nutrition in acute small intestinal obstruction. Emergency Medicine. 2015;(2(14)):48–59. (In Russ.).
7. Chashchina D. M., Grifanov A. R. Prevention of complications during nasointestinal intubation. StudNet. 2022;5(2):972–977. (In Russ.).
8. Gorsky V. A., Volenko A. V., Krivikhin D. V. et al. Technical features of nasointestinal decompression for peritonitis. Practical Medicine. 2017;6(107):27–31. (In Russ.).
9. Korymasov E.A., Gorbunov Yu. V., Smelkin D.A. Controversial issues of small intestine intubation. Surgical practice. 2013;(3):55–59. (In Russ.).
10. Parshin D. S., Topchiev M. A. Treatment of intestinal failure syndrome in patients with diffuse peritonitis. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Natural and technical sciences. 2013;18(1):296–298. (In Russ.).
11. Yurkin E. M., Kulikov L. K., Mikhalevich I. M. et al. The effectiveness of using an electrical stimulator probe with a proximal pacemaker in patients with enteral insufficiency syndrome. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2011;105(6):94–96. (In Russ.)
12. Vlasov A. P., Salakhov E. K., Markin O. V. et al. Ways to correct enteral distress syndrome in widespread peritonitis. Surgery. Journal named after N. I. Pirogov. 2022;(2):50–56. (In Russ.).
13. Lobankov V. M., Prizentsov A.A. Postoperative nasointestinal intubation (to the discussion on the timing of removal of the nasointestinal tube). Surgical practice. 2013;(3):53–54. (In Russ.).
14. Zemlyanoy V. P., Filenko B. P., Kotkov P. A. Treatment and prevention of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Bulletin of Northwestern State Medical University named after. I. I. Mechnikov. 2017;9(1):68–72. (In Russ.).
15. Dong X. W., Huang S. L., Jiang Z. H. et al. Nasointestinal tubes versus nasogastric tubes in the management of small-bowel obstruction: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(36):e12175. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012175.
16. Kayano H., Nomura E., Ueda Y. et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for small bowel obstruction and factors related to outcomes. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020;15(2):268–275. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.93243.
17. Tan Y., Chen H., Mao W. et al. Short-term clinical outcomes after using novel deeper intubation technique (DIT) of ileus tube for acute bowel obstruction patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020;2020:1625154. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1625154.
18. Gowen G. F. Long tube decompression in successful in 90% of patients with ad-hesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 2003;185(6):512– 515. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00074-6.
19. Ten Broek R. P. G., Krielen P., Di Saverio S. et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0185-2.
20. Torer N., Nursal T. Z., Tufan H. et al. Effect of manual bowel decompression (milking) in the obstructed small bovel. Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):807– 813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.028
21. Fazel M. Z., Jamieson R.W., Watson C. J. Long-term follow-up of the use of the Jones intestinal tube in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Sur g Engl. 2009;91(1):50–54. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588409X358999.
22. Treutner K. H., Bertram P., Loser S. et al. Prophylaxe und Therapie intraabdomineller Adhäsionen. Eine Umfrage an 1200 Kliniken in Deutschland. Chirurg. 1995;66:398–403. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588409X358999.
23. Scott-Coombes D. M., Vipond M. N., Thopson J. N. General surgeons’ attitude to the treatment and prevention of abdominal adhesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75:123–128.
24. Meissner K. Effectiveness of intestinal tube splinting: a prospective observational study. Dig Surg. 2000;17(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018800.
25. Meissner K. Intestinal splinting for uncomplicated early postoperative small bowel obstruction: is it worthwhile? Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43(10):813–8.
26. Eryukhin I.A., Petrov V. P. Khanevich M. D. Intestinal obstruction. Guide for doctors. M.: Medicine, 1999. P. 443. (In Russ.).
27. Savelyev V. S. Guide to emergency surgery. M.: Publishing house “Triada-X”. 2004. P. 640. (In Russ.).
28. Popova T. S., Baklykova N. M., Shramko L. U. and others. Theoretical foundations of enteral nutrition in surgical pathology of the abdominal organs. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 1995;5(4)39. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Sigua B.V., Demko A.E., Petrov S.V., Samarcev V.А., Zavrazhnov A.A., Kotkov P.A., Solov’ev I.A., Nishnevich E.V., Mikhin I.V., Bondarevskiy I.I., Glebova A.V., Kuznetsova M.P., Kurkov A.A., Zemlyanoy V.P. Comparative effectiveness of small bowel decompression methods in patients with benign small bowel obstruction: results of a multicenter non-randomized controlled retrospective study. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2025;184(2):59-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-2-59-70