LEVEL OF THE GUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PATIENTS AFTER ESOPHAGOPLASTY ON THE BASIS OF GASTROINTESTINAL INDEX ASSESSMENT
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-15-18
Abstract
The article presents the interview results of 55 patients after esophagoplasty (30 cases - after esophagogastroplasty, 25 cases - after esophagoplasty) using questionnaire GIQLI. The authors came to conclusions about advantages of extirpation of esophagus with esopagogastroplasty compared with subtotal shunt esophagocoloplasty because of high rate of gastrointestinal index of the quality of life and their components in patients after esophagogastroplasty compared with results of patients after esophagoplasty. There was noted an expessed growth in the scales and rise of gastrointestinal index in patients who underwent esophagogastroplasty after 3 years of follow-up.
About the Authors
I. E. Sudovykh
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Drobyazgin
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Chikinev
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Черноусов А. Ф., Ручкин Д. В., Черноусов Ф. А., Балалыкин Д. А. Болезни искусственного пищевода. М., 2008. 673 с.
2. Burgos L., Barrena S., Andrés A. M. et al. Colonic interposition for esophageal replacement in children remains a good choice: 33-year median follow-up of 65 patients // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010. Vol. 45, № 2. Р. 341-345.
3. Cense H. A., Visser M. R., van Sandick J. W. et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement // J. Surg. Oncol. 2004. Vol. 88, № 1. Р. 32-38.
4. Coopman S., Michaud L., Halna-Tamine M. et al. Long-term outcome of colon interposition after esophagectomy in children // J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2008. Vol. 47, № 4. Р. 458-462.
5. Eypasch E., Williams J. I., Wood-Dauphineet S. et al. Gastrointestinal quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument // Brit. J. Surg. 1995. Vol. 82. P. 216-222.
6. Gawad K. A., Busch C., Izbicki J. R. The route of reconstruction following esophagectomy // Zentralbl. Chir. 2001. Bd. 126, № 1. S. 2-8.
7. Hosokawa M., Ishii M., Taguchi D., Aoki T. Esophageal reconstruc tion using the stomach // Nihon Rinsho. 2011. Vol. 69, № 6. Р. 274-277.
8. Kinoshita Y., Udagawa H. Basic technique for reconstruction after esophagectomy // Kyobu Geka. 2010. Vol. 63, № 8. P. 740-743.
9. Molena D., Yang S. C. Surgical management of end-stage achalasia // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 24, № 1. Р. 19-26.
10. Nakajima M., Kato H., Miyazaki T. et al. Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconstruction // Hepatogastroenterology. 2007. Vol. 54, № 73. Р. 104-110.
11. Renzulli P., Joeris A., Strobel O. et al. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: a single-center experience // Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004. Bd. 389. S. 128-133.
12. Scarpa M. Quality of life after surgery of the alimentary tract // World J. Gastroenterol. 2010. Vol. 40, № 16. Р. 5020-5023.
13. Tannuri U., Maksoud-Filho J. G., Tannuri A. C. et al. Which is better for esophageal substitution in children, esophagocoloplasty or gastric transposition? A 27-year experience of a single center // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007. Vol. 42, № 3. Р. 500-504.
14. Yannopoulos P., Theodoridis P., Manes K. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy: 25 years of experience over 750 patients // Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2009. Bd. 394, № 4. S. 611-616.
Review
For citations:
Sudovykh I.E., Drobyazgin E.A., Chikinev Yu.V. LEVEL OF THE GUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PATIENTS AFTER ESOPHAGOPLASTY ON THE BASIS OF GASTROINTESTINAL INDEX ASSESSMENT. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(4):15-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-15-18
Views:
424
Email this article 