POSSIBILITIES OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES OF VISUALIZATION AND MODELING IN ORTHOPEDICS AND THEIR ROLE IN DEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN HIP ARTHROPLASTY
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-46-52
Abstract
The article presents the authors’ experience. Medical visualization is applied in orthopedics on all stages such as diagnostics, treatment planning and control of the results. Modern approaches in instrumental diagnostics and specialized application-dependent software allowed a new qualitative level of orthopedics and medical care in different areas of medicine. Modern technologies gave a lot of opportunities to doctors in order to improve diagnostics at higher level, make an individual planning of operations and built individual implants, when it wasn’t possible to use standard constructions.
About the Authors
A. N. Kovalenko
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. I. Shubnyakov
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. S. Bilyk
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. O. Denisov
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. M. Tikhilov
R. R. Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Тихилов Р. М., Шубняков И. И., Коваленко А. Н. и др. Применение индивидуальной трехфланцевой конструкции при ревизионном эдопротезировании с нарушением целостности тазового кольца. Клинический случай // Травматол. и ортопед. России. 2016. № 1. С. 10-116.
2. Тихилов Р. М., Шубняков И. И., Коваленко А. Н. и др. Показания к ревизионному эндопротезированию тазобедренного сустава, планирование и техника ревизионной операции: Руководство по хирургии тазобедренного сустава / Под ред. Р. М. Тихилова, И. И. Шубнякова. СПб.: РНИИТО им. Р. Р. Вредена, 2015. Т. 2. С. 258-355.
3. Тихилов Р. М., Шубняков И. И., Коваленко А. Н. и др. Данные регистра эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава РНИИТО им. Р. Р. Вредена за 2007-2012 г. // Травматол. и ортопед. России. 2013. № 3. С. 167-190.
4. Anderson D. D., Thomas T. P., Campos Marin A. et al. Computational techniques for the assessment of fracture repair // Injury. 2014. Vol. 45, Suppl. 2. P. 23-31.
5. Attias N., Lindsey R. W., Starr A. et al. The use of a virtual three dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. 2005. Vol. 87. P. 1520-1523.
6. Brown G. A., Firoozbakhsh K., Gehlert R. J. Three-dimensional CT modeling versus traditional radiology techniques in treatment of acetabular fractures // Iowa Orthop. J. 2001. Vol. 21. P. 20-24.
7. Cimerman M., Kristan A. Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules // Injury. 2007. Vol. 38. P. 442-449.
8. Cleary K., Peters T. M. Image-guided interventions: technology review and clinical applications // Ann. Rev. Biomed. Engl. 2010. Vol. 12. P. 119-142.
9. Deserno T. M., Aach T., Amunts K. et al. Advances in medical image processing // Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 2011. Vol. 26. P. 1-3.
10. Gellrich N. C., Schramm A., Hammer B. et al. Computer-assisted secondary reconstruction of unilateral posttraumatic orbital deformity // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2002. Vol. 110. P. 1417-1429.
11. Handels H., Ehrhardt J., Plötz W., Pöppl S. J. Simulation of hip operations and design of custom-made endoprostheses using virtual reality techniques // Methods Inf. Med. 2001. Vol. 40. P. 74-77.
12. Handels H., Ehrhardt J. Medical image computing for computer supported diagnostics and therapy - advances and perspectives // Methods Inf. Med. 2009. Vol. 48. P. 11-17.
13. Handels H., Ehrhardt J., Plötz W., Pöppl S. J. Three-dimensional planning and simulation of hip operations and computer-assisted construction of endoprostheses in bone tumor surgery // Comput. Aided. Surg. 2001. Vol. 6. P. 65-76.
14. Handels H., Horsch A., Meinzer H. P. Advances in medical image computing // Methods Inf. Med. 2007. Vol. 46. P. 251-253.
15. Healy D. A., Murphy S. P., Burke J. P., Coffey J. C. Artificial interfaces («AI») in surgery: historic development, current status and program. implementation in the public health sector // Surg. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 22. P. 77-85.
16. Horsch A., Deserno, T. M., Handels H. et al. Special Issue: BVM 2007 German conference on medical image processing // Int. J. Comp. Ass. Rad. Surg. 2008. Vol. 2. P. 253-254.
17. Langlotz F., Bachler R., Berlemann. U. et al. Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998. Vol. 354. P. 92-102.
18. Lehmann T. M., Aach T., Witte H. Sensor. Signal and image informatics. State of the art and current topics // Methods Inf. Med. 2006. Vol. 47 (Suppl. 1). P. 57-67.
19. Lehmann T.M, Meinzer H. P., Tolxdorff T. Advances in biomedical image analysis past, present and future challenges // Methods Inf. Med. 2004. Vol. 43. P. 308-314.
20. Maratt J. D., Srinivasan R. C., Dahl W. J. et al. Cloud-based preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty: a study of accuracy, efficiency, and compliance // Orthopedics. 2012. Vol. 35. P. 682-686.
21. Marchetti C., Bianchi A., Bassi M. et al. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillo-facial virtual surgery (VISU) // J. Craniofac. Surg. 2006. Vol. 17. P. 661-667.
22. Marchetti C., Bianchi A., Muyldermans L. et al. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning // Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 26-32.
23. Mohsen A. M., Phillips R. Letter of the reviewers - update on CAOS projects // Injury. 2004. Vol. 35 (Suppl. 1). P. S-A2-5.
24. Morrey B. F. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989. Vol. 249. P. 169-175.
25. Munjal S., Leopold S. S., Kornreich D. et al. CT-generated 3dimen sional models for complex acetabular reconstruction // J. Arthroplasty. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 644-653.
26. Rommens P. M., Hessmann M. H. Acetabulum fractures // Unfallchirurg. 1999. Vol. 102. P. 591-610.
27. Scholl I., Aach T., Deserno T. M., Kuhlen T. Challenges of medical image processing. From kilo- to terabyte // Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 2011. Vol. 26. P. 5-13.
28. Seel M. J., Hafez M. A., Eckman K. et al. Three-dimensional planning and virtual radiographs in revision total hip arthoplasty for instability // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006. Vol. 442. P. 35-38.
29. Tolxdorff T., Deserno T. M., Handels H., Meinzer H. P. Advances in medical image computing // Methods. Inf. Med. 2009. Vol. 48. P. 311-313.
30. Tonetti J., Cloppet O., Clerc M. et al. Optimal placement of iliosacral screws: 3D computed tomography simulation // Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 2000. Vol. 86. P. 360-369.
31. Tsumura H., Kaku N., Ikeda S., Torisu T. A computer simulation of rotation acetabular osteotomy for dysplastic hip joint: does the optimal transposition of the acetabular fragment exist? // J. Orthop. Sci. 2005. Vol. 10. P. 145-151.
32. Wu X. B., Wang J. Q., Zhao C. P. et al. Printed three-dimensional anatomic templates for virtual preoperative planning before reconstruction of old pelvic injuries: initial results // Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2015. Vol. 128. P. 477-482.
Review
For citations:
Kovalenko A.N., Shubnyakov I.I., Bilyk S.S., Denisov A.O., Tikhilov R.M. POSSIBILITIES OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES OF VISUALIZATION AND MODELING IN ORTHOPEDICS AND THEIR ROLE IN DEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTIONS IN HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(4):46-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-46-52
Views:
456
Email this article 