Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST: FROM IDEA TO PRACTICAL APPLICATION

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-84-88

Abstract

Methods of surgical interventions performing, modifications, instruments used for operation became more developed every year. In spite of this fact, tendency of increase of the rate of iatrogenic errors took place and it was possible to prevent these mistakes by application of Surgical Safety Checklist. The «checklists» are easily available, not very expensive in practice and they are simple to use. An application of such questionnaires could improve the team work and understanding between members of the crew, which could influence directly on operation outcome. The article presents the history of creation of safety list, the analysis of efficacy of «checklist» application in clinical practice in different countries, information about controversial questions in «checklist», perspectives of its application.

About the Authors

A. L. Akopov
I. P.Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation


G. T. Bechvaya
I. P.Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation


A. A. Abramyan
I. P.Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation


E. V. Lotsman
I. P.Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Большаков О. П., Семенов Г. М. Лекции по оперативной хирургии и клинической анатомии. СПб.: Питер, 2000. 480 с.

2. Гордиевская Л. А. Опыт работы по внедрению хирургического чек-листа // Главная мед. сестра. 2015. № 2. С. 17-25.

3. Bliss L. A., Ross-Richardson C. B., Sanzari L. J. et al. Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist // J. Am. Coll Surg. 2012. Vol. 215. P. 766-776.

4. Christian E., Harris B., Wrobel B., Zada G. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: implementation of an operative and perioperative checklist // Neurosurgical Focus. 2014. Vol. 37. P. E1.

5. Conley D. M., Singer S. J., Edmondson L. et al. Effective surgical safety checklist implementation // J. Am. Coll Surg. 2011. Vol. 212. P. 873-879.

6. Cowell HR. Wrong-site surgery // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1998. Vol. 80. P. 463.

7. de Vries E. N., Prins H. A., Crolla R. M. et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2010. Vol. 363. P. 1928-1937.

8. de Vries E. N., Ramrattan M. A., Smorenburg S. M. et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review // Qual Saf Health Care. 2008. Vol. 17. P. 216-223.

9. Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto. USA: Metropolitan Books, 2009. P. 209.

10. Gawande A., Thomas E. J., Zinner M.J, Brennan T.A. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992 // Surgery. 1999. Vol. 126. P. 66-75.

11. Haynes A. B., Weiser T. G., Berry W. R. et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population // N. Engl. J. Med. 2009. Vol. 360. P. 491-499.

12. Leape L., Lawthers A. G., Brennan T.A. et al. Preventing medical injury // Qual. Rev. Bull. 1993. Vol. 19. P. 144-149.

13. Michaels R. K., Makary M. A., Dahab Y. et al. Achieving the Na tional Quality Forum’s «Never Events»: prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations // Ann. Surg. 2007. Vol. 245. P. 526-532.

14. National Patient Safety Agency. UK surgical organisations sign up to World Health Organisation challenge: safe surgery saves lives. [http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/corporate/news/safe-surgery-saves-lives/].

15. National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). Organisation Patient Safety Incident Reports [http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/patient-safety-incident-data/organisation-reports/organisationpatient-safety-incident-reports/].

16. Nepple K. G., Sandhu G. S., Rogers C. G. et al. Description of a multicenter safety checklist for intraoperative hemorrhage control while clamped during robotic partial nephrectomy // Patient Safety in Surgery. 2012. Vol. 6. P. 8.

17. Panesar S. S., Cleary K., Sheikh A., Donaldson L. The WHO checklist: a global tool to prevent errors in surgery // Patient Safety in Surgery. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 9.

18. Ronsmans C., Graham W. J. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 368. P. 1189-1200.

19. Shojania K. G., Duncan B. W., McDonald K. M. et al. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices // Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. 2001. Vol. 43: i-x. P. 1-668.

20. Thousands of mistakes made in surgery every year. By Jennifer Warner WebMD Health News reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD [http://www.webmd.com/news/20121220/thousands-mistakes-surgery].

21. Urbach D. R., Govindarajan A., Saskin R. et al. Introduction of Surgical Safety Checklists in Ontario, Canada // N. Engl. J. Med. 2014. Vol. 370. P. 1029-1038.

22. van Klei W.A., Hoff R. G., van Aarnhem E. E. et al. Effects of the introduction of the WHO «Surgical Safety Checklist» on inhospital mortality: a cohort study // Ann. Surg. 2012. Vol. 255. P. 44-49.

23. Vats A., Vincent C. A., Nagpal K. et al. Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience // B. M. J. 2010. Vol. 340. P. 133-135.

24. Vogts N., Hannam. J. A., Merry A. F., Mitchell S. J. Compliance and quality in administration of a Surgical Safety Checklist in a tertiary New Zealand hospital // N. Z. Med. J. 2011. Vol. 124. P. 48-58.

25. Weiser T. G., Regenbogen S. E., T4hompson K. D. et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data // Lancet. 2008. Vol. 372. P. 139-144.

26. Young-Xu Y., Neily J., Mills P. D. et al. Association between implementation of a medical team. training program. and surgical morbidity // Arch. Surg. 2011. Vol. 146. P. 1368-1373.


Review

For citations:


Akopov A.L., Bechvaya G.T., Abramyan A.A., Lotsman E.V. SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST: FROM IDEA TO PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(4):84-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-4-84-88

Views: 747


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)