ПРОГНОСТИЧЕСКИЕ СИСТЕМЫ ПРИ ПРОБОДНЫХ ГАСТРОДУОДЕНАЛЬНЫХ ЯЗВАХ

прободная гастродуоденальная язва, прогностические системы, выбор вида и объема операции

1. Altaca G., Sayek I. D., Onat D. et al. Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: comparison of a new score system with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index // Eur. J. Surg. 1992. Vol. 158. P. 217-221.

2. Bae S., Shim S. K., Kim N. et al. Incidence and short-term mortality from perforated peptic ulcer in korea: a population-based study// J. Epidemiol. 2012. Vol. 22. P. 508-516.

3. Blomgren L. G. Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly // World J. Surg. 1997. Vol. 21. P. 412-414.

4. Boey J., Choi S. K., Poon A., Alagaratnam T.T. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors // Ann. Surg. 1987. Vol. 205. P. 22-26.

5. Buck D. L., Møller M. H. Influence of body mass index on mortality after surgery for perforated peptic ulcer // Brit. J. Surg. 2014. Vol. 101. P. 8-12.

6. Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L., MacKenzie C. R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation // J. Chronic Dis. 1987. Vol. 40. P. 373-383.

7. Copeland G. P., Jones D., Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit // Brit. J. Surg. 1991. Vol. 78. P. 355-360.

8. Dellinger R. P., Levy M. M., Rhodes A. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012 // Crit. Care. Med. 2013. Vol. 41. P. 580-637.

9. Donovan A. J., Vinson T. C., Maulsby G. O., Gewin J. R. Selective treatment of duodenal ulcer with perforation // Ann. Surg. 1979. Vol. 189. P. 627-636.

10. Irvin Т. Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: case for risk stratification in elderly patients // Brit. J. Surg. 1989. Vol. 76. P. 215-218.

11. Knaus W.A., Draper E. A., Wagner D. P., Zimmerman J. E. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system // Crit. Care Med. 1985. Vol. 13. P. 818-829.

12. Lee F.Y.J., Leung K. L., Lai B. S. P. et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers // Arch. Surg. 2001 Vol. 136. P. 90-93.

13. Lemeshow S., Teres D., Klar J. et al. Mortality probability models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients // J. A. M. A. 1993. Vol. 270. P. 2478-2486.

14. Mäkelä J. T., Kiviniemi H., Ohtonen P., Laitinen S. O. Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcers // Eur. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 168. P. 446-451.

15. Menekse E., Kocer B., Topcu R. et al. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer // World J. Emergency Surg. 2015. Vol. 10. P. 7-11.

16. Mishra A., Sharma D., Raina V. K. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries // Ind. J. Gastroenterol. 2003. Vol. 22. P. 49-53.

17. Møluller M. H., Adamsen S., Wernich R. Preoperative prognostic factors for mortality in peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review// J. Gastrointes. Surg. 2010. Vol. 45, № 7-8. P. 785-805.

18. Møluller M. H., Adamsen S., Thomsen R. W., Møller A. N. Multi-centre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation //Brit. J. Surg. 2011. Vol. 98. Issue 6. P. 802-810.

19. Meuller M. H., Engebjerg M. C., Adamsen S. et al. The peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation.A cohort study // Acta Anaest. Scand. 2012. Vol. 56. P. 655-662.

20. Møluller M. H., Shah K., Bendix J. et al. Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation // Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2009. Vol. 44. P. 145-152.

21. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures // Anesthesiology. 1941. Vol. 2. P. 281-284.

22. Schein M., Gecelter G., Freinkel Z., Gerding H. APACHE II in emergency operations for perforated ulcers // Am. J. Surg. 1990. Vol. 159. P. 309-313.

23. Soreide K., Korner H., Soreide J. A. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis in surgical research and decision making // Ann. Surg. 2011. Vol. 253. P. 27-34.

24. Søreide K., Thorsen K., Søreide J. A. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer // BJS. 2014. Vol. 101. P. 51-64.

25. Søreide K., Thorsen K., Søreide J. A. Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease // Eur. J. Trauma and Emergency Surg. 2014. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 148-152.

26. Suriya C., Kasatpibal N., Kunaviktikul W., Kayee T. Development of a simplified diagnostic indicators scoring system and validation for peptic ulcer perforation in a developing country // Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2012. Vol. 5. P. 187-194.

27. Thorsen K. Søreide J. A., Søreide K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? a population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2014. Vol. 18, № 7. P. 1261-1268.