Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ НОВЫХ АППАРАТНЫХ МЕХАТРОННЫХ СРЕДСТВ НАРУЖНОЙ КОМПРЕССИИ ГРУДНОЙ КЛЕТКИ ЧЕЛОВЕКА ПРИ ПРОВЕДЕНИИ СЕРДЕЧНО-ЛЁГОЧНОЙ РЕАНИМАЦИИ

About the Authors

С. Багненко
Первый Санкт-Петербургский медицинский университет им. акад. И. П. Павлова
Russian Federation


А. Лопота
Центральный научноисследовательский и опытно-конструкторский институт робототехники и технической кибернетики
Russian Federation


О. Резник
Первый Санкт-Петербургский медицинский университет им. акад. И. П. Павлова
Russian Federation


М. Шиганов
Первый Санкт-Петербургский медицинский университет им. акад. И. П. Павлова
Russian Federation


Н. Грязнов
Центральный научноисследовательский и опытно-конструкторский институт робототехники и технической кибернетики
Russian Federation


К. Сенчик
Центральный научноисследовательский и опытно-конструкторский институт робототехники и технической кибернетики
Russian Federation


В. Харламов
Центральный научноисследовательский и опытно-конструкторский институт робототехники и технической кибернетики
Russian Federation


А. Ширин
Центральный научноисследовательский и опытно-конструкторский институт робототехники и технической кибернетики
Russian Federation


References

1. Мороз В. В., Бобринская И. Г., Васильев В. Ю. Сердечнолегочная и церебральная реанимация. М.: НИИ ОР РАМН, ГОУ ВПО МГМСУ, 2011. С. 14-15.

2. Нестеренко И. В., Селищев С. В., Телышев Д. В. Автоматический мониторинг параметров компрессии грудной клетки человека при сердечно-легочной реанимации // Мед. техника. 2012. № 4. С. 1-3.

3. Abella B. S., Alvarado J. P., Myklebust H. et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest // JAMA 2005. Vol. 293. P. 305-310.

4. Axelsson C., Nestin J., Svensson L. et al. Clinical consequences of the introduction of mechanical chest compression in the EMS system for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a pilot study // Resuscitation. 2006. Vol. 71. P. 47-55.

5. Chang M. W., Coffeen P., Lurie K. G. et al. Active compression-decompression CPR improves vital organ perfusion in a dog model of ventricular fibrillation // Chest. 1994. Vol. 106. P. 1250-1259.

6. Cobb L. A., Fahrenbuch C. E., Walsh T.R. et al. Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation // J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999. Vol. 281. P. 1182-1188.

7. Cohen T. J., Goldner B., Maccaro P. et al. A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital // N. Engl. J. Med. 1993. Vol. 329. P. 1918-1921.

8. Cohen T. J., Tucker K. J., Lurie K. G. et al. Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group // JAMA. 1992. Vol. 267. P. 2916-2923.

9. Cooper J. A., Cooper J. D., Cooper J. M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. History, current practice and future direction. Contemporary reviews in cardiovascular medicine // Circulation. 2006. Vol. 114. P. 2839-2849.

10. Field J. M., Hazinski M. F., Sayre M. R. et al. American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science. Part 1: Executive Summary // Circulation. 2010. Vol. 122. P. 640-656.

11. Frascone R. J., Bitz D., Lurie K. Combination of active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the inspiratory impedance threshold device: state of the art // Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2004. Vol. 10. 193-201.

12. Halperin H. R., Paradis N., Ornato J. P. et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics and mechanisms // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004. Vol. 44. P. 2214-2220.

13. Hightower D., Thomas S. H., Stone C. K. et al. Comparing CPR during ambulance transport. Manual vs. mechanical methods // JEMS. 1991. Vol. 16. P. 63-68.

14. Kouwenhoven W. B., Jude J. R., Knickerbocker G. G. Closed-chest cardiac massage // J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1960. Vol. 173. P. 1064-1067.

15. Levine R. L., Wayne M. A., Miller C. C. End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest // N. Engl. J. Med. 1997. Vol. 337. P. 301-306.

16. Lurie K. G., Shultz J. J., Callaham M. L. et al. Evaluation of active compression-decompression CPR in victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest // JAMA. 1994. Vol. 271. P. 1405-1411.

17. Maier G. W., Tyson G. S., Olsen C. O. et al. The physiology of external cardiac massage: high impulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation // Circulation. 1984. Vol. 70. P. 86-101.

18. Maule Y. L’assistancecardiaqueexterne: nouvelle approchedans la RCP // Urgences Accueil. 2007. Vol. 29. P. 4-7.

19. Ong M. E., Ornato J. P., Edwards D. P. et al. Use of an automated, load distributing band chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation // JAMA. 2006. Vol. 295. P. 2629-2637.

20. Ong M. E., Sultana P., Fook-Chong S. et al. Comparison of load-distributing band and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients presenting with cardiac arrest to the emergency department // Prehospital Emergency Care. 2011. Vol. 15. P. 106- 112.

21. Paradis N., Young G., Lemeshow S. et al. Inhomogeneity and temporal effects in AutoPulse Assisted Prehospital International Resuscitation - an exception from consent trial terminated early // Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2010. Vol. 28. P. 391-398.

22. Plaisance P., Lurie K. G., Vicaut E. et al. Evaluation of an impedance threshold device in patients receiving active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out of hospital cardiac arrest // Resuscitation. 2004. Vol. 61. P. 265-271.

23. Rubertsson S., Huzevka T., Smekal D., Johansson J. Early survival after cardiac arrest in a pilot study using the LUCAS device compared to manual chest compressions during CPR // Circulation. 2007. Vol. 116. P. 386.

24. Rubertsson S., Lindgren E., Smekal D. et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial // JAMA. 2014. Vol. 311, № 1. P. 53-61

25. Smekal D., Johansson J., Huzevka T., Rubertsson S. No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device - a pilot study // Resuscitation. 2009. Vol. 80, № 10. P. 1104-1107

26. Wagner H., Terkelsen C. J., Friberg H. et al. Cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory: a 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts // Resuscitation. 2010. Vol. 81. P. 383-387.

27. Wigginton J. G., Miller A. H., Fernando L. et al. Mechanical devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation // Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2005. Vol. 11. P. 219-223.

28. Wik L. Rediscovering the importance of chest compressions to improve the outcome from cardiac arrest // Resuscitation. 2003. Vol. 58. P. 267-271.

29. Wirth S., Korner M., Treitl M. et al. Computed tomography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using automated chest compression devices - an initial study // Eur. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 19. P. 1857-1866.


Review

For citations:


 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   . Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(2):118-123. (In Russ.)

Views: 320


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)