COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF REOPERATIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY DEPENDING ON THE PROCEDURE OF OPERATIVE INTERVENTION
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2013-172-3-019-023
Abstract
The operations of coronary artery bypass surgery were performed in 52 patients over the period of time since June 2004 till November 2012. The age of the patients was from 46 till 77 years (on average 60,8±7,8 years). These patients were divided three groups on the basis of features of methods of coronary artery bypass surgery. The groups were matched between each other due to the initial clinic data. Acute cardiovascular insufficiency predominated in the structure of complications of the early postoperative period in 9 (17,3%) patients. These 6 (11,%) patients were operated under condition of the artificial circulation used. An average time of in-patient treatment was 13,6±5,6, 10,7±3,5 and 15,2±6,1 days of hospitalization respectively. The hospital lethality made up 3,8%. Reoperative myocardial revascularization is an effective method of treatment of recurrence of myocardial ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery. The performance of coronary revascularization on the working heart facilitates to the reduction of the risk of the development of postoperative complications, including cardial ones and can lead to quick recovery.
About the Authors
D. L. Yurchenko
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. O. Denisyuk
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. E. Sharafutdinov
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Volkov
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. N. Yakovlev
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Pajvin
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Akins C. W., Buckley M. J., Daggett W. M. et al. Reoperative coronary grafting: changing patients profiles, operative indications, techniques, and results // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1994. Vol. 58. P. 359–365.
2. Brener S., Loop F. D., Lytle B. W. et al. A profile of candidates for repeat myocardial revascularization: Implications for selection of treatment // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1997. Vol. 114. P. 153–161.
3. Gonzalez-Stawinski G. V., Lytle B. W. Coronary artery reoperations. In Cardiac surgery in the adult. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008. P. 711–732.
4. Mohite P. N., Kotkar K. D., Popov A. F. et al. Tunneling technique for anatomical positioning of aortoaxillary bypass graft // Asian. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 93–94.
5. Noyez L., Skotnicki S. H., Lacquet L. K. Morbidity and mortality in 200 consecutive coronary reoperations // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1997. Vol. 11. P. 528–532.
6. Sabik J. F., Blackstone E. H. et al. Occurrence and risk factors for reintervention after coronary artery bypass grafting // Circulation. 2006. Vol. 114. P. 454–460.
7. Weintraub W. S., Jones E. L., Craver J. M. et al. In-hospital and long-term outcome after reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery // Circulation. 1995. Vol. 92. P. 50–57.
8. Yau T. M., Borger M. A., Weisel R. D. et al. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 120. P. 156–63.
Review
For citations:
Yurchenko D.L., Denisyuk D.O., Sharafutdinov V.E., Volkov A.M., Yakovlev N.N., Pajvin A.A. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMMEDIATE RESULTS OF REOPERATIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY DEPENDING ON THE PROCEDURE OF OPERATIVE INTERVENTION. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2013;172(3):019-023. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2013-172-3-019-023
Views:
381
Email this article 