ПРОБЛЕМА ВЫБОРА ПЛАСТИЧЕСКОГО МАТЕРИАЛА В РЕКОНСТРУКТИВНОЙ ХИРУРГИИ СЕРДЦА

пластический материал, механические свойства, реконструктивная хирургия, консервант

1. Al Halees Z., Al Shahida M., Al Sanei A., Sallehuddin A. et al. Up to 16 years follow-up of aortic valve reconstruction with pericardium: a stentless readily available cheap valve? // Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2005. Vol. 28. P. 200–205.

2. Breinholt J. P. 3rd., Hawkins J. A., Lambert L. M. et al. A prospective analysis of the immunogenicity of cryopreserved nonvalved allografts used in pediatric heart surgery // Circulation. 2000. Vol. 102, Suppl. 3, № 19. P. 179–182.

3. Carpentier A., Lemaigre G., Robert L. et al. Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular heterografts // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1969. Vol. 58, № 4. P. 467–483.

4. Duncan A. C., Boughner D. Effect of dynamic glutaraldehyde fixation on the viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardial tissue // Biomaterials. 1998. Vol. 19, № 7–9. P. 777–783.

5. Eckman M. H., Beshansky J. R., Durand-Zaleski I. et al. Anticoagulation for non-cardiac procedures in patient with prosthetic heart valve: does low risk mean high cost? // JAMA. 1990. Vol. 263. P. 1513–1521.

6. Garcia Paez J. M., Jorge E., Rocha A. et al. Mechanical effects of increases in the load applied in uniaxial and biaxial tensile testing. Part II. Porcine pericardium // J. Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2002. Vol. 13, № 5. P. 477–483.

7. Haluck R. S., Richenbacher W. E., Myers J. L. et al. Pericardium as a thoracic aortic patch: Glutaraldehyde-fixed and fresh autologous pericardium // J. Surg. Res. 1990. Vol. 48, № 6. P. 611–614.

8. Harken D. E. Heart valves: ten commandments and still counting // Ann. Thorac Surg. 1989. Vol. 48. Suppl. 3. P. 18–19.

9. Hawkins J. A., Breinholt J. P., Lambert L. M. et al. Class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies after implantation of cryopreserved allograft material in pediatric patients // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 119, № 2. P. 324–330.

10. Lee J. M., Boughner D. R. Tissue mechanics of canine pericardium in different test environments. Evidence for time-dependent accommodation, absence of plasticity, and new roles for collagen and elastin // Circ. Res. 1981. Vol. 49, № 2. P. 533–544.

11. Lee J. M., Boughner D. R. Mechanical properties of human pericardium. Differences in viscoelastic response when compared with canine pericardium // Circ. Res. 1985. Vol. 57, № 3. P. 475–481.

12. Lee J. M., Boughner D. R., Courtman D. W. The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material // J. Biomedical Materials Research. 1984. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 79–98.

13. Lee J. M., Haberer S. A., Boughner D. R. The bovine pericardial xenograft: I. Effect of fixation in aldehydes without constraint on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium // J. Biomedical Materials Research. 1989. Vol. 23, № 5. P. 457–475.

14. Lee J. M., Langdon S. E. Thickness measurement of soft tissue biomaterials: A comparison of five methods // J. Biomechanics. 1996. Vol. 29, № 6. P. 829–832.

15. Lee M. C., Fung Y. C., Shabetai R., LeWinter M. M. Biaxial mechanical properties of human pericardium and canine comparisons // Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 1987. Vol. 253, № 1. P. 75–82.

16. Lee W. K., Park K. D., Kim Y. H. et al. Improved calcification resistance and biocompatibility of tissue patch grafted with sulfonated PEO or heparin after glutaraldehyde fixation // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2001. Vol. 58, № 1. P. 27–35.

17. Liao K., Frater R. W.M., LaPietra A. et al. Time-dependent effect of glutaraldehyde on the tendency to calcify of both autografts and xenografts // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995. Vol. 60, Suppl. 2. P. 343–347.

18. Marien B. J., Raffetto J. D., Seidman C. S. et al. Bovine pericardium vs dacron for patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective randomized study // Arch. Surg. 2002. Vol. 137, № 7. P. 785–788.

19. Rajani B., Mee R. B., Ratliff N. B. Evidence for rejection of homograft cardiac valves in infants // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998. Vol. 115, № 1. P. 111–117.

20. Roll S., Müller-Nordhorn J., Keil T. et al. Dacron vs. PTFE as bypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery — systematic review and meta-analysis // BMC Surgery. 2008. Vol. 8, № 22. P. 1–8.

21. Sanchez D. M., Gaitán D. M., León A. F. et al. Fixation of Vascular Grafts With Increased Glutaraldehyde Concentration Enhances Mechanical Properties Without Increasing Calcification // ASAIO J. 2007. Vol. 53. Issue 3. P. 257–262.

22. Tremblay D., Zigras T., Cartier R. et al. A comparison of mechanical properties of materials used in aortic arch reconstruction // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009. Vol. 88. P. 1484–1491.

23. Turrentine M. W., Ruzmetov M., Vijay P. et al. Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in children // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001. Vol. 71, Suppl. 5. P. 356–360.

24. Vincentelli A., Latrémouille C., Zegdi R. et al. Does glutaraldehyde induce calcification of bioprosthetic tissues? // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998. Vol. 66, Suppl. 1, № 6. P. 255–258.

25. Vincentelli A. Mechanical Modifications to Human Pericardium after brief Immersion in 0.625% Gluteraldehyde // J. Heart Valve Disease. 1998. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 24–29.

26. Vincentelli A., Zegdi R., Fabre O. et al. Is 10 Minutes the Optimum Immersion Time in 0.6% Glutaraldehyde for Human Pericardium? // J. Heart Valve Disease. 2000. Vol. 9, № 4. P. 567.

27. Yang C. Tissue Engineering of Human Cardiovascular Patches. 2005. P. 4–8.