SURGICAL TACTICS IN THE TREATMENT OF CICATRICIAL STRICTURES OF THE BILE DUCTS BECAUSE OF THE IATROGENIC INJURIES AND AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE OPERATIONS
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-1-65-68
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effective surgical technique in the treatment of cicatricial strictures of the bile ducts. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The authors analyzed the surgical treatment of 18 patients with iatrogenic cicatricial damages of the bile ducts. The development of cicatricial strictures of the bile ducts was diagnosed in all 18 patients with iatrogenic damages of bile ducts after previously performed reconstructive operations. RESULTS. biliodigestive anastomoses on the exchangeable transhepatic drains were applied for 17 patients; Y-anastomosis were applied for 1 patient. biliodigestive anastomoses on the exchangeable transhepatic drains were applied for 2 patients of the 17 on the second stage in 3 months after external drainage of the hepatic ducts. Repeated scarring of the bile ducts and anastomosis had not been observing for the 5 years of observation. CONCLUSION. The choice of surgical tactics in treatment of cicatricial strictures of the bile ducts depends on the type of stricture. high strictures appears more often. The effective treatment of them is biliodigestive anastomoses on exchangeable transhepatic drains.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Korolkov
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. M. Savrasov
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. A. Kitaeva
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. N. Popov
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. F. Bagnenko
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Артемьева Н. Н. Повреждение желчных протоков во время операции и способы их устранения // Анн. хир. гепатол. 1996. C. 269. [Artem’eva N. N. Povrezhdenie zhelchnyh protokov vo vremja operacii i sposoby ih ustranenija // Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 1996. P. 269].
2. Гальперин Э. И., Дюжева Т. Г. Лекции по гепатобилиарной хирургии. М. : ВидарМ, 2011. C. 123–145. [Gal’perin Je. I., Djuzheva T. G. Lekcii po gepatobiliarnoj hirurgii. M.: VidarM, 2011. P. 123–145.].
3. Котельникова Л. П., Бурнышев И. Г., Баженова О. В. Хирургическая тактика при повреждениях внепеченочных желчных протоков // Перм. мед. журн. 2014. № 4. С. 26–32. [Kotel’nikova L. P., Burnyshev I. G., Bazhenova O. V. Hirurgicheskaja taktika pri povrezhdenijah vnepechenochnyh zhelchnyh protokov // Permskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2014. № 4. P. 26–32].
4. Майстренко Н. А., Стукалов В. В., Шейко С. Б. Повреждения желчных протоков при традиционных и видеолапароскопических операциях // Анн. хир. гепатол. 2000. № 2. С. 122–123. [Majstrenko N. A., Stukalov V. V., Shejko S. B. Povrezhdenija zhelchnyh protokov pri tradicionnyh i videolaparoskopicheskih operacijah // Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2000. № 2. P. 122–123].
5. Махмадов Ф. И., Курбонов К. М., Собиров А. Д. Новые миниинвазивные технологии в диагностике и лечении осложнений оперативных вмешательств на печени и желчевыводящих путей // Академ. журн. Западной Сибири. 2013. № 2 (45). С. 15–16. [Mahmadov F. I., Kurbonov K. M., Sobirov A. D. Novye miniinvazivnye tehnologii v diagnostike i lechenii oslozhnenij operativnyh vmeshatel’stv na pecheni i zhelchevyvodjashhih putej // Akademicheskij zhurnal Zapadnoj Sibiri. 2013. № 2 (45). P. 15–16.]
6. Токаренко В. П. Проблемы хирургического лечения ятрогенных повреждений и стриктур внепеченочных желчных протоков // Фундамент. исслед. 2014. № 101. С. 203–207. [Tokarenko V. P. Problemy hirurgicheskogo lechenija jatrogennyh povrezhdenij i striktur vnepechenochnyh zhelchnyh protokov // Fundomental’nye issledovanija.
7. № 10. P. 203–207.] 7. Хоронько Ю. В., Ермолаев А. Н., Дмитриев А. В. Выбор билиодигистивной реконструкции при последствиях ятрогенных повреждений внепеченочных желчных протоков // Фундамент. исслед. 2014. № 10. С. 571–574. [Horon’ko Ju. V., Ermolaev A. N., Dmitriev A. V. Vybor biliodigistivnoj rekonstrukcii pri posledstvijah jatrogennyh povrezhdenij vnepechenochnyh zhelchnyh protokov // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. 2014. № 10. P. 571–574].
8. Шаповальянц С. Г., Будзинский С. А., Федоров Е. Д., Маринова Л. А. Эндоскопическое лечение послеоперационных рубцовых стриктур желчевыводящих путей (20летний опыт) // Анн. хирург. гепатол. 2011.
9. Т. 16, № 2. С. 10–17. [Shapoval’janc S. G., Budzinskij S. A., Fedorov E. D., Marinova L. A. Jendoskopicheskoe lechenie posleoperacionnyh rubcovyh striktur zhelchevyvodjashhih putej (20letnij opyt) // Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2011. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 10–17].
10. Born P., Rosch T., Bruhl K. et al. Longterm results of endoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic treatment of benign biliary strictures // Endoscopy. 2011. Vol. 31. P. 725–731].
11. Costamagna G., Pandolfi M., Mutignani M. et al. Longterm results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents // Gastrointestinal endoscope. 2010. Vol. 54. P. 498–507.
12. Gazzaniga G. M., Filauro M., Mori L. Surgical treatment of iatrogenic lesions of the proximal common bile duct // World Journal of Surgery. 2001. Vol. 25, № 10. P. 1254–1259.
13. Suman L., Civelli E. M., Cozzi G., Milella M., Severini A. Longterm re sults of balloon dilation of benign duct strictures // Acta Radiologica. 2003. Vol. 44, № 2. P. 147–150.
Review
For citations:
Korolkov A.Yu., Savrasov V.M., Kitaeva M.A., Popov D.N., Bagnenko S.F. SURGICAL TACTICS IN THE TREATMENT OF CICATRICIAL STRICTURES OF THE BILE DUCTS BECAUSE OF THE IATROGENIC INJURIES AND AFTER RECONSTRUCTIVE OPERATIONS. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(1):65-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-1-65-68
Views:
850
Email this article 