LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESS IN THE TREATMENT OF ADHESIVE INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-2-30-33
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Improvement of surgical treatment of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. This article shows the analyzing results of surgical treatment of 73 patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction. The main group consisted of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction; adhesiolysis was performed for them laparoscopically. The comparison group included patients who underwent laparotomy.
RESULTS. Conversions to laparotomy were not noted in the main group. There is no significant difference in the number of complications in the compared groups. In the main group, the duration of the operative intervention was significantly less, the level of postoperative pain was lower, the recovery of intestinal peristalsis was faster, the hospital stay was shorter (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION. Laparoscopic access in comparison with laparotomy for patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction has several advantages, and can be used in this category of patients.
About the Authors
S. V. Tarasenko
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
O. V. Zaitsev
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
P. V. Sokolov
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
A. A. Natalsky
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
S. Yu. Prus
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
T. S. Rakhmaev
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
A. Yu. Bogomolov
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
I. V. Kulikova
Federal State Budgeraty Educational Institution of Higher Education «I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryazan
Russian Federation
Ryazan
References
1. Sazhin A. V., Mosin S. V., Dzusov M. A. Mesto laparoskopicheskikh tekhnologiy v diagnostike i lechenii ostroy kishechnoy neprokhodimosti neopukholevogo geneza (obzor literatury) // RMZH. 2016. № 3. P. 190–192.
2. Strizheletskii V. V., Ryvkin A. Iu., Makarov S. A. et al. Novye vozmozhnosti v diagnostike i lechenii bol’nyh s ostroj spaechnoj neprohodimost’ju kishechnika s primeneniem jendovideohirurgii // Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2011. № 3. P. 7–10.
3. Timofeev M. E., Volkov V. V., Shapovalyants S. G. Ostraja spaechnaja tonkokishechnaja neprohodimost’ na sovremennom jetape : vozmozhnosti laparoskopii v diagnostike i lechenii // Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2015. № 21. P. 36–52.
4. Milukov V. E. Izuchenie osnovnyh patogeneticheskih mehanizmov posle ustranenija ostroj tonkokishechnoj neprohodimosti // Rossiyskiy medikobiologicheskiy vestnik im. Akademika I. P. Pavlova. 2011. № 3. P. 87–93.
5. Fedoseev A. V. Budarev V. N. Muravyev S. Yu. et al. Taktika pri obturacionnoj kishechnoj neprohodimosti i vozmozhnosti ee sovershenstvovanija // Nauka molodykh – eruditio juvenium. 2013. № 4. P. 66–70.
6. Sankar A., Johnson S. R., Beattie W. S. et al. Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice // BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014. № 3. P. 424–432.
7. Coccolini F., Ansaloni L., Manfrediatall R. et al. Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI) : proposal of a score for the «ignored iceberg» of medicine and surgery // World J. Emerg Surg. 2013. № 1. P. 6.
8. Alukhanyan L. O., Dmitriev M. N., Dmitrieva N. S. et al. Diagnostika, izmereniye i rasprostranennost’ boli // Rossiyskiy zhurnal boli. 2011. № 2. P. 21–26.
9. Nenarokomov A.Y., Speransky D.L., Arevshatov E.V. et al. Sovremennaja koncepcija issledovanija kachestva zhizni v onkologii // Fundamental’nyye issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. P. 421–425.
Review
For citations:
Tarasenko S.V., Zaitsev O.V., Sokolov P.V., Natalsky A.A., Prus S.Yu., Rakhmaev T.S., Bogomolov A.Yu., Kulikova I.V. LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESS IN THE TREATMENT OF ADHESIVE INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(2):30-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-2-30-33
Views:
764
Email this article 