CHOICE OF PROSTHESIS IN AXILLOFEMORAL BYPASS IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK AND MULTILEVEL LESIONS OF LOWER LIMB ARTERIES
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-4-34-38
Abstract
An analysis of results of experimental research was made in 60 patients with critical ischemia of lower extremities due to bilaterally atherosclerotic lesions of aorto-iliac segment, which had a high operationally anaesthetic risk. Synthetic polytetrafluoethylene prosthesis or biological shunt from internal pectoral bull arteries were used as a shunt. Revasculization was performed through the system of arteria profunda femoris considering multilevel lesions of lower limb arteries. An application of biological prosthesis allowed decreasing the rate of early postoperative complications on 13,3% , late thromboses - on 30%, extending the medium term of shunt functioning in 1,8%, improving physical component of health on 12,8% and mental - on 9,1% during the immediate postoperative period. The experiments on rabbits were carried out. It was shown, that biological prosthesis had the greatest biological compatibility.
About the Authors
B. S. Sukovatykh
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. N. Belikov
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. A. Rodionov
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. O. Rodionov
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Кобак А. Е., Лембриков И. А., Немков А. С. и др. Оценка риска развития осложнений после шунтирования брюшного отдела аорты // Вестн. хир. 2012. № 6. С. 100-103.
2. Клиническая ангиология: Руководство для врачей. В 2 т. / Под ред. А. В. Покровского. М.: Медицина, 2004. 804 с.
3. Леменев В. Л. Операция шунтирования из отдаленных сосудистых бассейнов в лечении критической ишемии нижних конечностей у больных пожилого и старческого возраста // Хирургия. 2003. № 12. С. 27-33.
4. Родионов П. А., Сонькин И. Н., Крылов О. В. и др. Первый опыт мини-лапаротомии при синдроме Лериша // Вестн. хир. 2011. № 3. С. 27-29.
5. Российский консенсус «Рекомендованные стандарты оценки результатов лечения пациентов с хронической ишемией нижних конечностей». М.: Медицина, 2001. 29 с.
6. Суковатых Б. С., Беликов Л. Н., Родионов О. А., Родионов А. О. Эффективность биологического протеза при подмышечно-бедренном шунтировании у лиц с высоким операционным риском // Хирургия. 2014. № 6. С. 8-12.
7. Ascer E., Veith F. J. Comparison ofaxillounifemoral and axillobifemoral bypass operations // Surgery. 1985. Vol. 97. P. 169-174.
8. Conte M. S. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischemia of the leg (BASIL) and the (hoped for) dawn of evidence-based treatment for advanced limb ischemia // J. Vasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 51 (Suppl. S). P. 69-75.
9. Martin D., Katz S. G. Axillofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease // Am. J. Vasc. Surg. 2000. Vol. 180. P. 100-105.
10. Mohan C. R., Sharp W. J. A comparative evaluation of externally supported polytetrafluoroethylene axillobifemoral and axillounifemoral bypass grafs // J. Vasc. Surg. 1995. Vol. 21. P. 801-806.
11. Olson C. J. Repeat axillofemoral grafting as treatment for axillofemoral graft occlusion // Arch. Surg. 2002. Vol. 37, № 12. P. 1364-1368.
12. Passman M. A., Taylor L. M. Comparison of axillofemoral and aortofemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease // J. Vasc. Surg. 1996. Vol. 23. P. 263-267.
Review
For citations:
Sukovatykh B.S., Belikov L.N., Rodionov O.A., Rodionov A.O. CHOICE OF PROSTHESIS IN AXILLOFEMORAL BYPASS IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK AND MULTILEVEL LESIONS OF LOWER LIMB ARTERIES. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(4):34-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-4-34-38
Views:
390
Email this article 