Percutaneous puncture-draining interventions under ultrasound monitoring of fluid collections in acute pancreatitis
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2019-178-4-26-28
Abstract
The OBJECTIVE of the study was to improve the results of treatment of patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis with a minimally invasive method. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Results of percutaneous-puncture interventions under ultrasound in 62 patients with acute pancreatitis in the presence of fluid clusters were analyzed. In the first day from the moment of the disease, 39 % of patients admitted during the second and the third days – 31 % and more than three days – 20 % of patients. RESULTS. Diagnostic punctures of fluid collections under ultrasound control were performed. In 49 (79 %) of 62 patients, the puncture was effectively transformed into percutaneous drainage. In 13 of 49 patients were further operated. Lethal outcomes after puncture-draining interventions were in 5 cases. Among 44 patients operated with a minimally invasive method of acute pancreatitis, recovery was noted in 24, recurrence of fluid collections – in 7, 13 patients were operated on. CONCLUSION. Thus, early diagnosis and timely implementation of conservative and minimally invasive methods of treatment contributed to improving the immediate results of treatment of patients with fluid collections in acute pancreatitis.
About the Authors
K. M. Kurbonov
Tajik state medical university named after Abuali ibni Sino
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
139 Rudaki street, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
K. R. Nazirboev
Tajik state medical university named after Abuali ibni Sino
Tajikistan
139 Rudaki street, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
Tajikistan
139 Rudaki street, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
References
1. Zurabiani V. G., Gavrilin A. V., Matveeva G. K., Danilov M. V. Otsenka effektivnosti minimal’no invazivnykh lechebnykh vmeshatel’stv u bol’nykh ostrym destruktivnym pankreatitom: obzor literatury. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2007;12(1):7–14. (In Russ.).
2. Bagnenko S. F. Ostryy pankreatit (protokoly diagnostici i lecheniya). Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2006;(1):60–67. (In Russ.).
3. Demin D. B., Tarasenko V. S., Kornilov S. A., Shchetinin N. A. Maloinvazivnaya khirurgiya pankreonekroza – uspekhi i problemy. Vestnik khirurgii im. I. I. Grekova. 2009;(5):55–58. (In Russ.).
4. Kulezneva Yu. V., Okhotnikov O. I., Musaev G. Kh., Izrailov R. E., Bruslik S. V., Grigoriev S. N., Moroz O. V. Chreskozhnoye vnutrenneye drenirovaniye postnekroticheskikh kist podzheludochnoy zhelezy. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2012;17(4):49–56. (In Russ.).
5. Durlesther V. M., Andreev A. V., Kuznetsov Yu. S., Gabriel S. A., Goncharenko S. I. Primeneniye maloinvazivnykh khirurgicheskikh vmeshatel’stv v lechenii ostrogo destruktivnogo pankreatita. Vestnik khirurgicheskoi gastroenterologii. 2014;(3):33–37. (In Russ.).
6. Jiang K., Huang W., Yang X. N., Xia Q. Present and future of prophylactic antibiotics for severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(3):279–284.
7. Zurabiani V. G., Gavrilin A. V., Matveeva G. K., Danilov M. V. Otsenka effektivnosti minimal’no invazivnykh lechebnykh vmeshatel’stv u bol’nykh ostrym destruktivnym pankreatitom: obzor literatury. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2007;12(1):7–14. (In Russ.).
8. Lubyansky V. G., Nasonov V. V. Endoskopicheskoye chrezzheludochnoye drenirovaniye zhidkostnykh skopleniy i postnekroticheskikh kist pri ostrom pankreatite. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;(4):40–44. (In Russ.).
9. Kulezneva Yu. V., Okhotnikov O. I., Musaev G. Kh., Izrailov R. E., Bruslik S. V., Grigoriev S. N., Moroz O. V. Chreskozhnoye vnutrenneye drenirovaniye postnekroticheskikh kist podzheludochnoy zhelezy. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2012;17(4):49–56. (In Russ.).
10. Vege S. S., Fletcher J. G., Talukdar R., Sarr M. G. Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(34):4291–4296.
11. Jiang K., Huang W., Yang X. N., Xia Q. Present and future of prophylactic antibiotics for severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(3):279–284.
12. Bollen T. L., Van Santvoort H. C., Besselink M. G. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg. 2008;9(1):6–21.
13. Lubyansky V. G., Nasonov V. V. Endoskopicheskoye chrezzheludochnoye drenirovaniye zhidkostnykh skopleniy i postnekroticheskikh kist pri ostrom pankreatite. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;(4):40–44. (In Russ.).
14. Mamoshin A. V., Gorpinich A. B., Vasiliev P. Yu., Borsukov A. V., Shatalov R. P., Alyanov A. L. Kristallograficheskiye osobennosti zhidkostnykh obrazovaniy pri ostrom destruktivnom pankreatite. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya. 2012;(17):44–47. (In Russ.).
15. Vege S. S., Fletcher J. G., Talukdar R., Sarr M. G. Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(34):4291–4296.
16. Bollen T. L., Van Santvoort H. C., Besselink M. G. The Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis revisited. Br J Surg. 2008;9(1):6–21.
17. Mamoshin A. V., Gorpinich A. B., Vasiliev P. Yu., Borsukov A. V., Shatalov R. P., Alyanov A. L. Kristallograficheskiye osobennosti zhidkostnykh obrazovaniy pri ostrom destruktivnom pankreatite. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskaya gastroenterologiya. 2012;(17):44–47. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kurbonov K.M., Nazirboev K.R. Percutaneous puncture-draining interventions under ultrasound monitoring of fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2019;178(4):26-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2019-178-4-26-28
Views:
733
Email this article 