Problems and ways of improving the efficiency of surgical treatment of hiatal herniae
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-16-19
Abstract
The objective of the study is to consider the main problems and to define the ways to improve the efficiency of surgical treatment of hiatal herniae.
Material and methods. 518 patients were operated, the plasty of hiatal hernia – posterior cruroraphy – was carried out in 191 (26.9%) of patients, the prosthetic materials via the method «mesh-reinforced» were used in 327 (63.1%) of patients.
Results. The general surgical complications were noted in 43 (8.3 %) patients, the delayed side effects were in 118 (22.8 %) patients, relapse of hiatal hernia were in 27 (5.9 %) patients.
Conclusion. The high frequency of relapses remains the main problem in surgery of hiatal hernia.
About the Authors
D. I. Vasilevskii
Pavlov University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Iu. Dvoretskii
Pavlov University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. S. Tarbaev
Pavlov University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Akhmatov
Pavlov University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Kubyshkin V. A., Kornyak B. S. Gastroezofageal’naya reflyuksnaya bolezn’. M.: SPROS. 1999. 208 p. (In Russ.).
2. Puchkov K. V., Filimonov V. B. Gryzhi pishhevidnogo otberstiya diafragmy. M.: Medpraktika. 2003. 171 p. (In Russ.).
3. Dean C., Etienne D., Carpentier B. et al. Hiatal hernias // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2012. Vol. 34. P. 291–299.
4. Farhangmehr N., Liakakos T., Charalabopoulos A. Paraoesophageal hernias: a surgical perspective // Gastrointest. Dig. Syst. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 520–523.
5. Granderath F., Kamolz T., Pointner R. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Wien: Springer-Verlag, 2006. 320 p.
6. Kohn G. P., Price R. R., Demeester S. R. et al. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia // Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, CA, 2013. 42 p. URL: https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-the-management-of-hiatalhernia/(дата обращения 19.11.2018).
7. Stefanidis D., Hope W. W., Kohn G. et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease // Surg. Endosc. 2010. Vol. 24. P. 2647–2669.
8. Vasilevskij D. I., Kulagin V. I. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie gastroehzofageal’noi reflyuksnoj bolezni / pod red. S. F. Bagnenko. M., 2015. 216 p. (In Russ.).
9. Fuchs K. H., Babic B., Breithaupt W. et al. EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease // Surg. Endosc. 2014. Vol. 28. P. 1753–1773.
10. Grubnik V. V., Malinovsky A. V. Oslozhneniya i neudovletvoritel’nye rezul’taty laparoskopicheskoj plastiki gryzh pishhevodnogo otverstya diafragmy: analiz otdalennykh rezultatov i povtornykh operatsij. Khark. khir. shk. 2013. № 1. P. 106–111.
11. CHernousov A. F., Bogopol’skij P. M., Kurbanov F. S. Khirurgiya pishhevoda. M.: Meditsina, 2000. 352 p. (In Russ.).
12. Arévalo C., Luna R. D., Luna-Jaspe C. A. et al. Literature review : a surgeon’s view of recurrent hiatal hernia // Rev. Col. Gastroenterol. 2015. Vol. 30. P. 443 – 451.
13. Furnée E., Hazebroek E. Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair : a systematic review of the literature // Surg. Endosc. 2013. Vol. 27. P. 3998–4008.
14. Imperatorea K., Olivierib B., Vincentelli C. Acute gastric volvulus : a deadly but commonly forgotten complication of hiatal hernia // Autopsy and Case Reports. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 21–26.
15. Jeul A. Review of literatures on laparoscopic prosthetic repair of giant hiatal hernia than pure anatomical repair of crura // W. J. Laparosc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 85–90.
16. Kahrilas P., Kim H., Pandolfino J. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008. Vol. 22. P. 601–616.
17. Koch O., Kaindlstorfer A., Antoniou S. Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty // Surg. Endosc. 2011. Vol. 25. P. 1024–1030.
18. Le Page P. A., Furtado R., Hayward M. et al. Durability of giant hiatus hernia repair in 455 patients over 20 years // Ann. R. Col. Surg. Engl. 2015. Vol. 97. P. 188–193.
19. Lidor A. O, Steele K. E., Stem M. et al. Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia // J.A.M.A. Surg. 2015. Vol. 150. P. 424–431.
20. Lugaresia M., Mattiolia S., Araminib B. et al. The frequency of true short oesophagus in type II–IV hiatal hernia // Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2013. Vol. 43. P. 30–36.
21. Luketich J. D., Nason K. S., Christie N. A. et al. Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2010. Vol. 139. P. 395–404.
22. Mittal S. K., Bikhchandani J., Gurney O. et al. Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach : objective follow-up of up to 5 years // Surg. Endosc. 2011. Vol. 25. P. 556–566.
23. Pointner R., Granderath F. Hiatus hernia and recurrence : the Achilles heel of antireflux surgery? // Chirurg. 2008. Vol. 79. P. 974–981.
24. Shamiyeh A., Szabo K., Granderath F. A. et al. The esophageal hiatus : what is the normal size? // Surg. Endosc. 2010. Vol. 4. P. 988–991.
25. Stadlhuber R. J., Sherif A. E., Mittal S. K. et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure : a 28-case series // Surg. Endosc. 2009. Vol. 23. P. 1219–1226.
26. Watson D. I., Thompson S. K., Devitt P. G. et al. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh. A randomized controlled trial // Ann. Surg. 2015. Vol. 261. P. 282–289.
Review
For citations:
Vasilevskii D.I., Dvoretskii S.I., Tarbaev I.S., Akhmatov A.M. Problems and ways of improving the efficiency of surgical treatment of hiatal herniae. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(6):16-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-16-19
Views:
637
Email this article 