Evolution of surgical suture in case of repairing the damaged flexor tendons of the fingers
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-91-95
Abstract
The review includes the analysis of the evolution of surgical suture in case of repairing the damaged flexor tendons of the fingers.
About the Authors
D. G. Nakonechnyi
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Kiseleva
Federal State Budgetary Institution «Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R. R. Vreden» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Volkova A. M. Khirurgija kisti. Ekaterinburg: Sredne-Ural’skoe kn. izd-vo, 1991–1996. P. 304. (In Russ.)
2. Tang J. B. Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon repair // Hand Clin. 2013. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 251–259.
3. Dzhanelidze Ju. Ju. Ranenie suhozhilij kisti i ih lechenie. Novyj khirurgicheskii arhiv. 1936. Vol. 36, № 143–144. P. 497–507. (In Russ.)
4. Kleinert H. E., Spokevicius S., Papas N. H. History of flexor tendon repair // J. Hand Surg. Am. 1995. Vol. 20. P. S46–S52.
5. Matev I., Bankov S. Reabilitacija pri povrezhdenijakh ruki. Sofija, 1981. P. 146–170. (In Russ.)
6. Tang J. B., Wang B., Chen F. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair techniques // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. Vol. 386. P. 252–259.
7. Sirotakova M., Elliot D. Early active mobilization of primary repairs of the flexor pollicis longus tendon with two Kessler two-strand core sutures and a strengthened circumferential suture // J. Hand Surg Br. 2004. Vol. 29, № 6. P. 531–535.
8. Gur’janov A. M., Safronov A. A., Zaharov V. V., Kandalov A. A., Lapynin A. I., Chekushkin A. V. K voprosu o khirurgicheskom lechenii povrezhdenii suhozhil’nogo apparata konechnostei. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. Vol. 178, № 3. P. 192–198. (In Russ.)
9. Prakash P. Kotwal, Mohammed Tahir Ansari. Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries : Venturing into the no man’s land // Indian J Orthop. 2012. Vol. 46, № 6. P. 608–615.
10. Bunnell S. Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two new instruments // Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1918. Vol. 26. P. 103–110.
11. Mason M. L., Allen H. S. The rate of healing of tendons : an experimental study of tensile strength // Ann Surg. 1941. Vol. 113, № 3. P. 424–459.
12. Verdan C. Е. Half a century of flexor-tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies // J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1972. Vol. 54A, № 3. P. 472–491.
13. Rozov V. I. Povrezhdenija suhozhilii kisti i pal’tsev i ikh lechenie. M.: Medgiz, 1952. 192 p. (In Russ.)
14. Zolotov A. S. Pervichnyj shov suhozhilii sgibatelei pal’tsev kisti v raznykh anatomicheskikh zonakh. Voprosy rekonstruktivnoj i plasticheskoj khirurgii. 2012. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 19–25. (In Russ.)
15. Dy C. J., Hernandez-Soria A., Ma Y. et al. Complications after flexor tendon repair : a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Hand Surg Am. 2012. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 543e–551e.
16. Nicoladoni C. Pes calcaneus traumaticus // Separatabdruck aus der Dr. Wittelshöfer’s Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1882. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 1–5.
17. Kirchmayr L. Zur Technik der Sehnennaht // Zbl Chir. 1917. Vol. 40. P. 906–907.
18. Lahey F. H. A tendon suture which permits immediate motion // Boston Med Surg J. 1923. Vol. 188, № 22. P. 851–852.
19. Kessler I. The «grasping» technique for tendon repair // Hand. 1973. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 253–255.
20. Primary repair of flexor tendons / H. E. Kleinert, J. E. Kutz, E. Atasoy, A. Stormo // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1973. Vol. 4, № 4. P. 865–876.
21. Tsuge K., Yoshikazu I., Matsuishi Y. Intratendinous tendon suture in the hand – a new technique // Hand. 1975. Vol. 7. P. 250–255.
22. Efimenko N. A., Gricjuk A. A., Gavrjushenko N.S., Sereda A.P., Kuleshov D.N. Optimal’nyi shov Akhillova suhozhilija (kliniko-jeksperimental’noe issledovanie). Moskovskii khirurgicheskii zhurnal. 2011. Vol. 3, № 19. P. 44–50. (In Russ.)
23. Kazakov M. M. Novyj metod suhozhil’nogo shva. Vestnik khirurgii. 1943. Vol. 62. P. 64–66. (In Russ.)
24. Hotokezaka S., Manske P. R. Differences between locking loops and grasping loops : effects on two-strand core sutures // J. Hand. Surg. Am. 1997. Vol. 22. P. 995–1003.
25. Manske P. R. History of flexor tendon repair // Hand Clin. 2005. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 123–127.
26. History and evolution of the Kessler repair / S. J. Sebastin, A. Ho, T. Karjalainen, K. C. Chung // J. Hand Surg Am. 2013. Vol. 38, № 3. P. 552–561.
27. Pennington D. G. The locking loop tendon suture // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1979. Vol. 63. P. 648–652.
28. Wu Y. F., Tang J. B. How much does a Pennington lock add to strength of a tendon repair? // J. Hand Surg Eur. 2011. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 476–484.
29. Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs / J. B. Tang, Y. Zhang, Y. Cao, R. G. Xie // J. Hand Surg. (Am.) 2005. Vol. 30. P. 1262–1266.
30. Hatanaka H., Manske P. R. Effect of suture size on locking and grasping flexor tendon repair techniques // Clin Orthop. 2000. Vol. 37, № 5. P. 267–274.
31. Influence of core suture purchase length on strength of four-strand tendon repairs / Y. Cao, R. G. Zhu Xie, J. B. Tang // J. Hand Surg (Am.). 2006. Vol. 31. P. 107–112.
32. Savage R. In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair // J. Hand Surg Br. 1985. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 135–141.
33. Tang J. B., Gu Y. T., Rice K. et al. Evaluation of four methods of flexor tendon repair for postoperative active mobilization // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001. Vol. 107, № 3. P. 742–749.
34. Barrie K. A., Tomak S. L., Cholewicki J. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs // J. Hand Surg. 2001. Vol. 26A. P. 340–346.
35. Trail I. A., Powell E. S., Noble J. The mechanical strength of various suture techniques // J. Hand Surg. 1992. Vol. 17B. P. 89–91.
36. Dovan T. T., Ditsios K. T., Boyer M. I. Eight-strand core suture technique for repair of intrasynovial flexor tendon lacerations // Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003. Vol. 7, № 2. P. 70–74.
37. Lim B. H., Tsai T. M. The six-strand technique for flexor tendon repair // Atlas Hand Clin. 1996. Vol. 1. P. 65–76.
38. Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendons in dogs / G. T. Lin, K. N. An, P. C. Amadio, W. P. Cooney // J. Hand Surg. 1988. Vol. 13A. P. 553–558.
39. Winters S. C., Gelberman R. H., Woo S. L. et al. The effects of multiplestrand suture methods on the strength and excursion of repaired intrasynovial flexor tendons : a biomechanical study in dogs // Hand Surg 1998. Vol. 23. P. 97–104.
40. Ann R., Lawrence T. M., Davis T. R. Locking loops for flexor tendon repair // Coll. Surg. Engl. 2005. Vol. 87, № 5. P. 385–386.
41. Tendon repair using flexor tendon splints : an experimental study / M. Aoki, P. R. Manske, D. L. Pruitt, B. J. Larson // J. Hand Surg. 1994. № 19A. P. 984–990.
42. Tang J. B., Chang J., Elliot D. et al. IFSSH Flexor Tendon Committee report 2014 : from the IFSSH Flexor Tendon Committee (Chairman : Jin Bo Tang) // J. Hand Surg Eur. 2014. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 107s–115.
Review
For citations:
Nakonechnyi D.G., Kiseleva A.N. Evolution of surgical suture in case of repairing the damaged flexor tendons of the fingers. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(6):91-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-91-95
Views:
691
Email this article 