Combination of acute appendicitis with torsion and necrosis of epiploic appendage in the transposition of internal organs
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-74-77
Abstract
Transposition of internal organs (situs inversus viscerum) is a rare version of biologically normal anatomy, in which the main internal organs have a mirror (reverse) arrangement compared to the normal position. Diseases of epiploic appendage (torsion, inflammation, necrosis) are rare and make up 0.1-0.3 % of acute diseases of the abdominal organs. A clinical case of treating a patient with acute appendicitis in combination with torsion and necrosis of epiploic appendage in the transposition of internal organs is presented.
About the Authors
S. R. Baymakov
Tashkent State Dental Institute
Uzbekistan
Competing Interests:
Uzbekistan
Baimakov Sayfiddin Risbaevich - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), associate professor, head of Department of Surgery and Military field surgery, Tashkent State Dental Institute.
103, Makhtumkuli str., Tashkent, 100016.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
U. R. Zhamilov
Tashkent State Dental Institute
Uzbekistan
Competing Interests:
Uzbekistan
Zhamilov Ulugbek Rashidovich - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), assistant of Department of Surgery and Military field surgery, Tashkent State Dental Institute.
103, Makhtumkuli str., Tashkent, 100016.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
S. Sh. Yunusov
Tashkent State Dental Institute
Uzbekistan
Competing Interests:
Uzbekistan
Yunusov Seydamet Shevketovich - assistant of Department of Surgery and Military field surgery, Tashkent State Dental Institute.
103, Makhtumkuli str., Tashkent, 100016.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. Kh. Ashirmetov
Tashkent State Dental Institute
Uzbekistan
Competing Interests:
Uzbekistan
Ashirmetov Abdurashid Khamidovich – MD, chief research fellow, Scientific Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion.
100016, Tashkent, Yashnabad district, Makhtumkuli street, building 103.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Polyanskiy I. Yu. Laparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya u bol'noy s polnym obratnym raspolozheniyem vnutrennikh organov. Arta medica. 2015;1:50-51. (In Russ.).
2. Cartwright S. L., Knudson M. P. Evaluation of acute abdominal pain in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:971-978.
3. Oh J. S., Kim K. W., Cho H. J. Left-sided appendicitis in a patient with situs inversus totalis. Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83:175-178.
4. Mayo C. W., Rice R. G. Situs inversus totalis. Arch Surg. 1949;58:724-730.
5. Choi D. H., Park J. W., Kim B. N. et al. Colonoscopy in situsinversustotalis patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008;103(5):1311-1312.
6. Hu Y., Zeng H., Pan X. L. et al. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a patient with situs viscerum inversus. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5744-5748.
7. Abdulzhavadov I. M. Laparoskopicheskaya diagnostika zavorota sal'nikovykh otrostkov tolstoy kishki u zhenshchin. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2005;5:33-35. (In Russ.).
8. Bandyopadhyay S. K., Jain М., Khanna S., Sen B., Tantia O. Torsion of the epiploic appendix: An unusual cause of acute abdomen. J Min Access Surg. 2007;3:70-72.
9. Sand M. et al. Epiploic appendicitis - clinical characteristics of an uncommon surgical diagnosis. BMC Surgery. 2007;11:47-50.
10. Baymakov S. R., Ashirmetov A. Kh., Boltayev Sh. Sh., Fayzullakhonov Sh. A. Nekroz sal'nikovogo otrostka niskhodyashchey obodochnoy kishki, simulirovavshiy ostryy zhivot. Vestnik TMA. 2019;4:29-35. (In Russ.).
11. Mukanov S. M. Effektivnost' laparoskopii pri diagnostike i lechenii perekruta sal'nikovykh podvesok tolstoy kishki. Meditsinskii zhurnal Zapadnogo Kazakhstana. 2011;3(31):108-109. (In Russ.).
12. Timofeyev M. Ye., Fedorov Ye. D., Krechetova A. P., Shapoval'yants S. G. Osobennosti diagnostiki i lecheniya perekruta zhirovykh struktur bryushnoy polosti laparoskopicheskim dostupom. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2014;5:13-16. (In Russ.).
13. Khadzhibayev F. A., Gulomov F. K. Perekrut i nekroz pryadi bol'shogo sal'nika i zhirovykh podvesok tolstoy kishki. Vestnik ekstrennoy meditsiny. 2017,11(3):30-33. (In Russ.).
14. Abdulzhavadov I. M. Zabolevaniya sal'nikovykh otrostkov tolstoy kishki: terminologiya, klinika, diagnostika i lecheniye. Novosti koloproktologii. 2006;5:59-64. (In Russ.).
15. Efendiyev Sh. M., Volkov O. V., Kurbanov M. A. Zabolevaniya zhirovykh podveskov obodochnoy kishki. Khirurgiya. 2003;10:64-66. (In Russ.).
16. Pogorelic Z., Stipic R., Druzijanic N., Perko Z., Grandic L., Vilovic K., Mrklic I., Juric I., Boschi V., Bekavac J. Torsion of epiploic appendage mimic acute appendicitis. Coll Antropol. 2011 Dec;35(4):1299-1302.
17. Rashid A., Nazir S., Hakim S. Y., Chalkoo M. A. Epiploic appendagitis of caecum: a diagnostic dilemma. Ger Med Sci. 2012;10:Doc14. Doi: 10.3205/000165.
Review
For citations:
Baymakov S.R., Zhamilov U.R., Yunusov S.Sh., Ashirmetov A.Kh. Combination of acute appendicitis with torsion and necrosis of epiploic appendage in the transposition of internal organs. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(1):74-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-1-74-77
Views:
821
Email this article 