100 ROBOTIC-ASSISTED OPERATIONS IN COLORECTAL CANCER (FIRST OUTCOMES)
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-6-80-84
Abstract
This article analyzed the immediate treatment results of 210 patients, underwent endovideosurgical operative treatment concerning colorectal cancer (106 laparoscopic and 104 robotic-assisted operations). According to the first results, there was no significant difference between two methods in such medical indices as the volume of intraoperative hemorrhage, terms of hospital stay and peristalsis recovery, the rate of conversion and complications in early postoperative period, quantity of removed lymph nodes, quality of TME. The application of robotics allowed performance of precision work in conditions of limited space of the small pelvis.
About the Authors
D. V. Gladyshev
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Kovalenko
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. E. Moiseev
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. S. Gnedash
Municipal hospital № 40
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. M. Karachun
N. N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
B. N. Kotiv
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. S. Shelegetov
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. I. Dzidzava
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. М.: Практика, 1998. 459 с.
2. Каприн А. Д.,Старинский В. В.,Петрова Г. В.Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2013 г. (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2015. 249 с.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2014. P. 68.
4. Clinical outcomes of surgical therapy study group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer // New Engl. J. Med. 2004. Vol. 350, № 20. P. 2050-2059.
5. Guillou P. J., Quirke P., Thorpe H. et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 365, № 9472. P. 1718-1726.
6. Halabi W. J., Kang C. Y., Jafari M. D. et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes // World J. Surg. 2013. Vol. 37, № 12. Р. 2782-2790.
7. Keller D. S., Hashemi L, Lu M. et al. Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2013. Vol. 217, № 6. P. 1063-1069.
8. Khan J. S. Colorectal cancer - surgery, diagnostics and treatment // Publisher: InTech, 2014. Р. 530.
9. Kim C. W., Baik S. H. Robotic rectal surgery: what are the benefits? // Min. Chirurgica. 2013. Vol. 68, № 5. Р. 457-469.
10. Melvin W.S, Needleman B. J., Krause K. R. et al. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor // J. Laparoendoscop. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2003. Vol. 13, № 1. Р. 33-36.
11. Veldkamp R., Kuhry E., Hop W. C. et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial // Lancet Oncology. 2005. Vol. 6, № 7. P. 477-484.
Review
For citations:
Gladyshev D.V., Kovalenko S.A., Moiseev M.E., Gnedash S.S., Karachun A.M., Kotiv B.N., Shelegetov D.S., Dzidzava I.I. 100 ROBOTIC-ASSISTED OPERATIONS IN COLORECTAL CANCER (FIRST OUTCOMES). Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2015;174(6):80-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2015-174-6-80-84
Views:
419
Email this article 