Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-1-21-26
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Identification of predictors of dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses in the long-term period after surgical treatment.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. We analyzed the completed treatment cases for the period from 2015 to 2020 and echocardiography data of 74 patients (42 men and 32 women) with an average age of 67.0±4.2 years with bioprostheses implanted in the aortic position. The average follow-up period was 4 years. The transaortic flow velocity, the average and peak transvalvular gradients, the area of the effective opening of the prosthesis, the myocardium mass index, the thickness and mobility of the cusp of the biovalve were evaluated. The presence of the pronounced PPM in a patient was determined at iEOA values less than 0.65 cm2/m2, moderate - at values from 0.65 to 0.85 cm2/m2, mild - up to 0.85 cm2/m2.
RESULTS. PPM was recorded in 27% of cases. Structural dysfunction was observed in 12.5% of cases, it mainly included stenosis of the bioprosthesis (10%). In 2.5% of cases, reintervention was performed for severe stenosis of the AV bioprosthesis. During the multifactorial analysis, we revealed that PPM was a predictor of the development of structural dysfunction of aortic valve bioprostheses in the long-term period after surgery (p<0.005).
About the Authors
G. G. Khubulava
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Gennadiy G. Khubulava - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the First Department of Surgery (Advanced Medical Training), Military Medical Academy.
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Z. O. Maliev
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Zaurbek O. Maliev - Cardiovascular Surgeon of the First Clinic of Surgery (Advanced Medical Training), Military Medical Academy.
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
N. N. Shikhverdiev
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nazim N. Shikhverdiev - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, First Department of Surgery (Advanced Medical Training), Military Medical Academy, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. I. Lyubimov
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Lyubimov - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Cardiac Surgery Department of the First Clinic of Surgery (Advanced Medical Training), Military Medical Academy.
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
D. I. Ushakov
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Dmitriy I. Ushakov - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon of the First Clinic of Surgery (Advanced Medical Training), Military Medical Academy.
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Rahimtoola S. H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch // Circulation. 1978;58(1):20-24. Doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.58.1.20.
2. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of patientprosthesis mismatch in the aortic position and its prevention // J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;(36):1131-1141. Doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00859-7.
3. Blais C., Dumesmil J. G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement // Circulation. 2003; (108):983-988. Doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085167.67105.32.
4. Flameng W., Meuris B., Herijgers P., Herregods M. C. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacementusing the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve // Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;(82):530-536. Doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.03.089.
5. Flameng W., Herregods M. C., Vercalsteren M., Herijgers P., Bogaerts K., Meuris B. Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Predicts Structural Valve Degeneration in Bioprosthetic Heart Valves // Circulation. 2010; 121(19):2123-2129. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.901272.
6. Shihverdiev N. N., Semyashkin A. M. Fenomen nesootvetstviya klapannogo proteza pacientu v khirurgii aortal'nyh porokov // Serdechno-sosudistye zabolevaniya: Byull. NCSSKH im. A. N. Bakuleva RAMN. 2005;6(5):32. (In Russ.).
7. Shihverdiev N. N. Traktat o vrachebnyh oshibkah. 2017:192-195. (In Russ.).
8. Seguin J. R., Grandmougin D., Folliguet T., Warembourg H., Laborde F., Chaptal P. A. Long-term results with the Sorin Pericarbon valve in the aortic position: a multicenter study // J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;(7):278-282.
9. Apostolakis E., Baikoussis N. G., Papakonstantinou N. A., Goudevenos J. Patient- prosthesis mismatch and strategies to prevent it during aortic valve replacement // Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011; (52):41-51
10. Mohty D., Malouf J. F., Girard S. E., Schaff H. V., Grill D. E., Enrique-Sarano M. E., Miller F. A. Jr. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in aortic position // Circulation. 2006;(113):420-426.
11. Flameng W., Meuris B., Yperman J., De Visscher G., Herijgers P., Verbeken E. Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprosthesis in adolescent sheep // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;(132):89-98. Doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.036.
12. Dangas G. D., Weitz J. I., Giustino G., Makkar R., Mehran R. Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis // JACC. 2016;(68):2675. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.958.
13. Pang P. Y., Garwood S., Hashim S. W. Intraoperative Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction Causing Severe Mitral Regurgitation // Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(4):E317-E319. Doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.019.
14. Ivanov V. A., Gavrilenko A. V., M'jo S. H., Evseev E. P., Ajdamirov Ya. A. Povtornye operacii na klapanah serdca // Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2015;(2):50.(In Russ.). Doi: 10.17116/kardio20158249-53.
15. Goel S., Monga N., Majhi S., Panigrahi B., Sinha S. K. Intraoperative detection of a stuck bioprosthetic mitral valve leaflet causing severe mitral regurgitation // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;(25):E44-E45.
16. Pal S. N., Golledge J. Osteo-progenitors in vascular calcification-A circulating cell theory // J of Atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2011;(18):551-559.
17. Barbarash L. S., Borisov V. V., Rutkovskaya N. V., Burago A. N., Oda-renko Yu. N., Kokorin S. G. Kliniko-morfologicheskoe issledovanie prichin disfunkcij epoksiobrabotannyh ksenoaortal'nyh bioprotezov v mitral'noj pozicii // Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2014;(4):84-86. (In Russ.).
18. Rizzoli G., Mirone S., Ius P., Polesel E., Bottio T., Salvador L. et al. Fifteen-year results with the Hancock II valve: a multicenter experience // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132(3):602-609.
19. Barbarash L. S., Rogulina N. V., Rutkovskaya N. V., Ovcharenko E. A. Mekhanizmy razvitiya disfunkcij biologicheskih protezov klapanov serdca // Kompleksnye problemy serdechno-sosudistyh zabolevanij. 2018;7(2):10-24. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2018-7-2-10-24.
20. Markl М., Kilner P. J., Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance // Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011;(13):7. Doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-7.
21. Suzigan S., Braile D. M., Souza D. R., Rossi M. A. Pathologic findings in 74 dysfunctional Braile-Biomedica bovine pericardial heart valves recovered at reoperation. 1978 to 1990 // J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994; (35):139-145.
22. Butany J. Y. u W., Silver M. D., David T. E. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis // J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;(8):4-15.
23. Roselli E. E., Smedira N. G., Blackstone E. H. Failure modes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position // J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;(15):421-427.
24. Valente M., Ius P., Bortolotti U., Talenti E., Bottio T., Thiene G. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans // J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;(7):180-189.
Review
For citations:
Khubulava G.G., Maliev Z.O., Shikhverdiev N.N., Lyubimov A.I., Ushakov D.I. Prosthesis-patient mismatch as a predictor of accelerated structural dysfunction of biological aortic valve prostheses. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2022;181(1):21-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-1-21-26
Views:
477
Email this article 