Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

Results of open prosthetics of abdominal aortic aneurysms using laparotomic and retroperitoneal approaches

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-41-47

Abstract

The OBJECTIVE was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm using laparotomic and retroperitoneal approaches.

METHODS AND MATERIALS. The study included 206 patients operated on at the Department of Vascular Surgery of the Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital from 2010 to 2018. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first – 112 people, whose surgical intervention was performed through laparotomic approach. The second – 94 patients, approach to the aorta was made by the retroperitoneal technique according to Rob. comparison of non-specific life-threatening complications included the development of myocardial infarction and acute cardiovascular failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome and respiratory failure, the development of ischemic colitis and small bowel obstruction, which required repeated interventions. The development of acute renal injury was characterized as an increase in creatinine by 50 % from baseline or a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by more than 25 %. This group of complications also included ischemic stroke, sepsis, and multiple organ failure. Wound complications included insolvency of postoperative wounds of retroperitoneal and laparotomic approaches, cases of eventration.

RESULTS. When analyzing the incidence of nonspecific complications, it was found that in group I their frequency was 41 (46.6 %) clinical cases, and in group II – 26 (27.6 %) (p=0.173*). In group I, the incidence of cardiovascular complications significantly exceeded those in group II – 17 (15.2 %) vs 6 (6.4 %) (p*=0.046). The incidence of gastrointestinal complications was also significantly higher in group I – 9 (8 %) vs 1 (1.06 %) (p*=0.021). The frequency of deaths in groups I and II did not differ significantly in 7 (6.25 %) and 5 (5.3 %) cases (p*=0.77).

CONCLUSION. As our study showed, retroperitoneal approach is a worthy alternative to laparotomy, mainly in case of repeated interventions, as well as in the presence of signs of visceral obesity of the patient. At the same time, laparotomic approach is associated with a higher risk of developing cardiovascular and gastrointestinal complications in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

About the Authors

S. E. Suzdaltsev
Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise; Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Suzdaltsev Sergey E. - Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Vascular Surgery, Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital (Veliky Novgorod, Russia), Postgraduate Student of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Institute of Medical Education.

41, Bol shaya Saint Petersburg str., Veliky Novgorod, 173003


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



R. A. Sulimanov
Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise
Russian Federation

Sulimanov Rusham A. - Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Institute of Medical Education.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



K. M. Vakhitov
Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Vakhitov Karim M. - Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Vascular Surgery, Doctor of the Highest Qualification Category.

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. I. Sukovatkin
Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise
Russian Federation

Sukovatkin Sergey I. - Head of the Department of Vascular Surgery, Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital (Veliky Novgorod, Russia), Postgraduate Student of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Institute of Medical Education.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



I. V. Korotkov
Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Korotkov Ivan V. - Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Vascular Surgery.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



O. Yu. Kalyuzhnaya
Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Kalyuzhnaya Olga Yu. - Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Vascular Surgery.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



T. M. Gasainiev
Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Gasainiev Timur M. - Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Vascular Surgery.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



M. D. Grigoryan
Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise
Russian Federation

Grigoryan Marieta D. - 4th year Student of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Institute of Medical Education.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



A. D. Kitsalmagomedova
Novgorod State University named after Yaroslav the Wise
Russian Federation

Kitsalmagomedova Ayzanat D. - 6th year Student of the Medical Faculty of the Institute of Medical Education.

Veliky Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



References

1. Klinicheskie recomendatsii Anevrizmy bryushnoi aorty / Rossiyskoe obshestvo angiologov i sosudistyh hirurgov. URL: https://angiolsurgery.org/library/recommendations/2022/aneurysm/recommendation.pdf (accessed: 06.08.2023). (In Russ.).

2. Landry G. J., Liem T. K., Abraham C. Z. et al. Predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // American journal of surgery. 2019;217(Issue 5):943–947.

3. Volodos’ N. L., Shekhanin V. E., Kar povich I. P. et al. Samofiksiruyushchiisya sinteticheskii protez dlya endoprotezirovaniya sosudov // Vestnik khirurgii. 1986;137(11):123–125. (In Russ.).

4. Oliveira-Pinto J., Oliveira N., Bastos-Gonçalves F. et al. Long-term results of outside “instructions for use” EVAR // The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2017;58(Issue 2):252–260.

5. Patel R., Sweeting M. J., Powell J. T. et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial // Lancet (London, England). 2016;388(Issue 10058):2366–2374.

6. Antoniou G. A., Antoniou S. A., Torella F. Editor’s Choice – Endovascular vs. Open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long term data of randomised controlled trials // Eur J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020;59(Issue 3): 385–397.

7. Antoniou G. A., Kontopodis N., Rogers S. K. et al. Editor’s choice – metaanalysis of compliance with endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: The EVAR Surveillance Paradox // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. 2023;65(Issue 2):244–254.

8. Rastogi V., Kim N. H., Marcaccio C. L. et al. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2022;64(Issue 1):23–31.

9. Glover K., Lyden S., Bena J. F. et al. Mid-term outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal exposures in open aortic aneurysm repair // Annals of vascular surgery. 2020;66:35–43.e1.

10. Teixeira P. G., Woo K., Abou-Zamzam A. M. et al. The impact of exposure technique on perioperative complications in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of vascular surgery. 2016;63:1141–1146.

11. Twine C. P., Humphreys A. K., Williams I. M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. 2013;46:36–47.

12. Deery S. E., Lancaster R. T., Baril D. T. et al. Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2016;63(Issue 5):1195–1200.

13. Buck D. B., Ultee K. H., Zettervall S. L. et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the targeted vascular National Surgical Quality Improvement Program // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2016;64(Issue 3):585–591.

14. Ma B., Wang Y. N., Chen K. Y. et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016;5(Issue 2):1465–1858.

15. Wanhainen A., Verzini F., Van Herzeele I. et al. Editor’s choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2019;57(Issue 1): 8–93.

16. Writing Committee for the VISION Study Investigators, Devereaux P. J., Biccard B. M. et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery // JAMA. 2017;317(Issue 16):1642–1651.

17. Karkos C. D. What is appropriate coronary assessment prior to abdominal aortic surgery? // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. 2003;25(Issue 6):487–492.

18. Kristensen S. D., Knuuti J., Saraste A. et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) // European heart journal. 2014;35(Issue 35):2383–2431.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Suzdaltsev S.E., Sulimanov R.A., Vakhitov K.M., Sukovatkin S.I., Korotkov I.V., Kalyuzhnaya O.Yu., Gasainiev T.M., Grigoryan M.D., Kitsalmagomedova A.D. Results of open prosthetics of abdominal aortic aneurysms using laparotomic and retroperitoneal approaches. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2023;182(5):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-5-41-47

Views: 291


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)