Comparison of valve-sparing techniques for surgical treatment of aortic root pathology: Florida Sleeve vs David procedure
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-5-57-61
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Such reconstructive operations on the aortic root as the David and Florida Sleeve procedures are fundamentally different in prosthetics of the aortic root with reimplantation of the ostiums of the coronary arteries into the prosthesis during David surgery and preservation of all native structures of the aortic root without reimplantation of the ostiums of the coronary arteries during Florida Sleeve surgery. Both procedures effectively reduce the dilated aortic ring, however, the Florida Sleeve procedure is performed much less frequently than the David procedure.
The OBJECTIVE was to study and analyze literature sources that present a comparison of the results of valve-preserving Florida Sleeve and David procedures.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. A search was conducted in PubMed and e-library databases from 2005 to 12.06.2023 for search queries. The studies were selected according to the PRISMA algorithm.
RESULTS. According to the results of search queries, 18 articles were found, 2 articles satisfying the selection criteria were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis was not carried out due to the pronounced heterogeneity of the data. In both studies, a statistically significant shorter time of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic occlusion takes when performing Florida Sleeve compared to David procedure. Short-term and long-term 5-year results of operations did not show statistically significant difference.
About the Authors
V. U. Efendiev
Mariinsky City Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Efendiev Vidadi U., Head of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgeon
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
нет конфликта интересов
V. K. Noginov
Mariinsky City Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Noginov Vladimir K., Cardiovascular Surgeon
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
нет конфликта интересов
References
1. David T. E., David C. M., Ouzounian M. et al. A progress report on reimplantation of the aortic valve. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2021;161(3):890–899.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.121.
2. Hess P. J., Klodell C. T., Beaver T. M., Martin T. D. The Florida sleeve: a new technique for aortic root remodeling with preservation of the aortic valve and sinuses. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2005;80(2):748–50. PMID: 16039256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.092.
3. Alhussaini M., Jeng E. I., Martin T. D. et al. Florida Sleeve is a safe and effective technique for valve salvage in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Journal of cardiac surgery. 2022;37(1):39–46. PMID: 34652039. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16078.
4. Holubec T., Rashid H., Hecker F. et al. Early- and longer-term outcomes of David versus Florida sleeve procedure: propensity-matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(3):ezac104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac104.
5. Chernyavskii A. M., Khvan D. S., Al’sov S. A. et al. Results of aortic root reimplantation in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and concomitant aortic insufficiency. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2015;21(1):141–7. (In Russ.).
6. Tasca G., Selmi M., Votta E. et al. Aortic root biomechanics after Sleeve and David sparing techniques: A finite element analysis. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2017;103(5):1451–1459. PMID: 27756469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.003.
7. Tasca G., Jaworek M., Lucherini F. et al. Leaflet kinematics after the Yacoub and Florida-sleeve operations: results of an in vitro study. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2021;59(3):674–679. PMID: 33236049. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa370.
8. Aalaei-Andabili S. H., Martin T. D., Hess P. J. et al. The Florida Sleeve procedure is durable and improves aortic valve function. Aorta. 2019;7(2):49– 55. PMID: 31529428. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687854.
9. Aalaei-Andabili S. H., Beaver T. M., Martin T. D. et al. Outcomes of Florida Sleeve procedure in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve. Innovations. 2020;15(4):361–368. PMID: 32729751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556984520938470.
10. Gamba A., Tasca G., Giannico F. et al. Early and medium term results of the Sleeve valve-sparing procedure for aortic root ectasia. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2015;99(4):1228–33. PMID: 25662437. https://doi.
11. org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.044.
12. Fajardo-Rodriguez E., Castro-Pinto M., López-Menéndez J. et al. Resultados a corto y medio plazo de la técnica de Florida Sleeve en la dilatación de raíz aórtica. Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico. 2021;91(4):465–469. PMID: 33725716. https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.20000448.
13. De Cicco G., Tagliari A. P., Di Matteo G. et al. Sleeve technicue combined with aortic valve replacement: a simpler alternative to the Bentall Procedure. Innovations. 2021;16(1):90–93. PMID: 33155866. DOI: 10.1177/1556984520967019.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Efendiev V.U., Noginov V.K. Comparison of valve-sparing techniques for surgical treatment of aortic root pathology: Florida Sleeve vs David procedure. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2024;183(5):57-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-5-57-61
Views:
320
Email this article 