Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

Analysis of the frequency and risk indicators of developing acute pancreatitis after gastrectomy

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-4-34-40

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Surgical intervention remains the only effective treatment for gastric cancer. Despite advances in surgical techniques, tissue dissection and coagulation methods, and the quality of postoperative intensive care, the incidence of early complications remains considerably high. One of the most serious postoperative complications is acute pancreatitis, which significantly prolongs hospital stay and may lead to unsatisfactory treatment outcomes.

The OBJECTIVE was to determine the incidence and risk factors for the development of acute pancreatitis following gastrectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS. From 01.01.2018 to 31.10.2023, a total of 198 patients with stage I–III gastric cancer underwent gastrectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center (Database State Registration Certificate no. 2024622328). Statistically significant factors influencing the development of acute pancreatitis after gastrectomy were identified.

RESULTS. The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) was 8 % (16 out of 198). Among the 16 patients with AP, 5 developed a grade B external pancreatic fistula. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of acute pancreatitis depending on the T category. Intraoperative blood loss volume also had a significant impact on the development of acute pancreatitis. Risk indicators for AP included the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (nLR). The threshold value for PLR was 215.6, and for nLR – 15.5. Exceeding these values predicted the development of AP in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION. Significant risk factors for the development of AP are the tumor size and depth of invasion (T category) and intraoperative blood loss exceeding 500 ml. Elevated serum amylase, PLR, and nLR levels on the first postoperative day, in the absence of other inflammatory signs, should be considered potential indicators of AP. 

About the Authors

E. A. Toneev
Ulyanovsk State University; Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center
Russian Federation

Toneev Evgeny A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery, Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Urology, Traumatology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharmacy and Postgraduate Medical Education, T. Z. Biktimirov Medical Faculty; Thoracic Surgeon of the Surgical Department of Thoracic Oncology

42, L’va Tolstogo str., Ulyanovsk, 432017

90, 12 Sentiabria str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


E. A. Keshyan
Ulyanovsk State University
Russian Federation

Keshyan Erik A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Assistant, Department of Hospital Surgery, Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Urology, Traumatology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharmacy and Postgraduate Medical Education, T. Z. Biktimirov Medical Faculty

42, L’va Tolstogo str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


D. I. Nuretdinov
Ulyanovsk State University
Russian Federation

Nuretdinov Danir I., Resident of the Department of General and Operative Surgery with Topographic Anatomy

42, L’va Tolstogo str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


A. A. Martynov
Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center
Russian Federation

Martynov Alexander A., Thoracic Surgeon, Head of the Surgical Department of Thoracic Oncology

90, 12 Sentiabria str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


A. V. Zhynov
Ulyanovsk Regional Oncology Center
Russian Federation

Zhinov Anatoly V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Surgeon, Head of the Surgical Department of Abdominal Oncology

90, 12 Sentiabria str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


A. A. Firstov
Ulyanovsk State University
Russian Federation

Firstov Artemiy A., Resident, Department of Hospital Surgery, Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Urology, Traumatology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharmacy and Postgraduate Medical Education, T. Z. Biktimirov Medical Faculty

42, L’va Tolstogo str., Ulyanovsk, 432017


Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest


References

1.

2. Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Fuchs H. E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.

3. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

4. Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., Shakhzadova A. O. State of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2020. Moscow, P. A. Herzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 68 p. (In Russ.).

5. Putila E., Helminen O., Helmiö M. et al. Population-based nationwide incidence of complications after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland. BJS open. 2023;7(Issue 5):zrad101. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad101.

6. Certificate of State Registration of Database № 2024622328, Russian Federation. Results of Gastrectomies at the Regional Oncology Dispensary: № 2024622108: application submitted on 16.05.2024: published on 29.05.2024 / V. D. Kulikov, L. A. Danilova, E. P. Anokhina et al. EDN MBWFHK. (In Russ.).

7. Ivashkin V. T., Kriger A. G., Okhlobystin A. V. et al. Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Society of Surgeons, the Russian Gastroenterological Association, the Association of Surgeons-Hepatologists and the Endoscopic Society “REndO” on Diagnostics and Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2022;32(2):99–156. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2022-32-2-99-156.

8. Guerra F., Giuliani G., Iacobone M. et al. Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4346–4356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5507-z.

9. Volkov V. E., Volkov S. V. Acute postoperative pancreatitis after gastrectomy and splenopancreatogastrectomy. Bulletin of the Chuvash University. 2012;(3):347–352. (In Russ.).

10. Tonsi A. F., Bacchion M., Crippa S. et al. Acute pancreatitis at the beginning of the 21st century: the state of the art. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(24):2945–59. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2945.

11. Heckler M., Hackert T., Hu K. et al. Severe acute pancreatitis: surgical indications and treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(3):521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01944-6.

12. Vychuzhanin D. V., Egorov A. V., Levkin V. V. et al. Diagnosis and prevention of postoperative pancreatitis. Surgery. Journal named after N. I. Pirogov. 2012;(4):63–69. (In Russ.).

13. Cho S. K., Jung S., Lee K. J., Kim J. W. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio can predict the severity of gallstone pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0748.

14. Jeon T. J., Park J. Y. Clinical significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as an early predictive marker for adverse outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(21):3883–3889. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3883.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Toneev E.A., Keshyan E.A., Nuretdinov D.I., Martynov A.A., Zhynov A.V., Firstov A.A. Analysis of the frequency and risk indicators of developing acute pancreatitis after gastrectomy. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2025;184(4):34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-4-34-40

Views: 22


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)