Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

Parastomal hernia: an unsolved problem of herniology

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-1-11-14

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The frequency of parastomal hernias reaches 58 % and occurs with any type of stoma.

The OBJECTIVE was to analyze the results of open retromuscular prosthetic repair of the abdominal wall with posterior separation of components in the treatment of parastomal hernias.

METHODS AND MATERIALS. Between 2019 and 2023, 11 patients with end colostomies and parastomal hernias were operated on. The median age of patients was 72 years. There were 10 women, 1 man. According to the classification of the European Society of Herniology (2014), the distribution was as follows: type I – there were no patients, type II – 1 patient, type III – 5 patients, type IV – 5 patients. One patient had a recurrent parastomal hernia. All patients underwent open retromuscular prosthetic repair of the abdominal wall with posterior separation of components and formation of a colostomy in the same place.

RESULTS. The treatment results were studied in 10 patients. There was fatal outcome in 1 patient with a type IV parastomal hernia due to infection with the development of necrotizing fasciitis and cellulitis of the abdominal wall. In one case, necrosis of the colostomy occurred, which required laparoscopic mobilization and re-formation of the colostomy. Long-term results were monitored in 9 patients over a period of 1 to 4 years. Recurrence occurred in 4 patients: 1 patient with type III parastomal hernia and 5 patients with type IV (two patients had 2 relapses). With repeated relapses, in one case, there was a pinching of the section of the small intestine in the paracolostomy opening

CONCLUSION. The results of treatment of parastomal hernias in our clinic were largely disappointing. Some success can be noted only in the treatment of type III parastomal hernias.

About the Authors

A. V. Vlasov
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Vlasov Alexander V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery and Transplantology

10/1, Minin and Pozharsky Sq., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, BOX-470


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 



A. V. Panyushkin
City Clinical Hospital № 7 named after E. L. Berezov
Russian Federation

Panyushkin Alexey V., Head of Surgical Department

Nizhny Novgorod


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. 



References

1. Rendell V. R., Pauli E. M. Parastomal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2023;103(5):993–1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.008.

2. Dewulf M., Dietz U. A., Montgomery A. et al. Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version: Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022;93(2):129–140. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5.

3. Carne P. W., Robertson G. M., Frizelle F. A. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003;90(7):784–793. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4220.

4. Antoniou S. A., Agresta F., Garcia Alamino J. M. et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018;22(1):183–198. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5.

5. Roussel B., Mulieri G., Gauzolino R. et al. Parastomal hernia. J Visc Surg. 2012;149(5):e15–e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.04.005.

6. Tastaldi L., Haskins I. N., Perez A. J. et al. Single center experience with the modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for parastomal hernia repair. Hernia. 2017;21(6):941–949. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1644-5.

7. DeAsis F. J., Lapin B., Gitelis M. E. et al. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(28):8670–8677. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.

8. Fleming A. M., Phillips A. L., Drake J. A. et al. Sugarbaker versus keyhole repair for parastomal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(3):573–584. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05412-y.

9. Köhler G., Fischer I., Wundsam H. et al. A novel technique for parastomal hernia repair combining a laparoscopic and ostomy-opening approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(2):209–214. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0313.

10. Malgina N. V., Rodoman G. V., Dolgina T. Yu. Late outcomes of parastomal hernia repair. Koloproktologia. 2023;22(2):79–85. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-79-85.

11. Pomazkin V. I. Treatment of the parastomal hernias. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2014;173(6):34–36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-6-34-36.

12. Li M. L., Fu X. J., Yao Q.Y. Dechnical development of parastomal hernia repair techniques. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022;25(11):1033– 1038. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220421-00170. PMID: 36396381.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Vlasov A.V., Panyushkin A.V. Parastomal hernia: an unsolved problem of herniology. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2024;183(1):11-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-1-11-14

Views: 246


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)