Current trends in early rehabilitation of patients after total hip and knee replacement
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-1-60-65
Abstract
The OBJECTIVE of the study was to analyze specialized publications concerning the tactics of rehabilitation treatment of patients after total knee and hip replacement based on the Fast-track protocol.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. We presented a systematic review of current literature, including 80 publications with a search depth of up to 45 years.
RESULTS. Components of the enhanced recovery program for large joint replacement are as follows: Preoperative stage: patient education, extremity joint exercises with a rehabilitation specialist, breathing exercises, avoidance of premedication with opioid analgesics, oral multimodal analgesia, preoperative oral carbohydrate load, absence of fluids in the oral cavity 2–3 hours before surgery, avoidance of preoperative fasting. Intraoperative stage: spinal or combined anesthesia, the use of regional anesthesia, intravenous dexamethasone, the use of tranexamic acid, intraoperative avoidance of excessive intravenous administration of colloid and crystalloid solutions, active intraoperative warming. Postoperative stage: multimodal oral analgesia, early mobilization (6–12–24 hours after surgery), passive-active exercises for 12–24 hours after surgery, preparation for verticalization.
CONCLUSION. The most popular hardware methods are mechanotherapy, cryotherapy, laser therapy, magnetic therapy and electrical neuromyostimulation. The introduction of computer technology into the postoperative rehabilitation program after large joints replacement makes it possible to restore an individual gait stereotype. A potentially promising direction is the introduction of artificial intelligence into early rehabilitation methods.
About the Authors
A. N. Tsed
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tsed Alexandr N., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the 2nd Traumatological and Orthopedic Department of the Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. A. Kozhevin
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Kozhevin Alexei A., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Docent of the Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, Orthopedic Traumatologist, Head of the department – Doctor of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of the Department of Physical Methods of Treatment and Rehabilitation
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
N. E. Mushtin
Pavlov University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Mushtin Nikita E., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Docent of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Orthopedic Traumatologist of the 2nd Traumatological and Orthopedic Department of the Research Institute of
Surgery and Emergency Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Privec R., Johnson A. J., Mears S. C., Mont M. A. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1768‒1777.
2. Moskalev V. P., Kornilov N. V., Shapiro K. I. Medical and social problems of endoprosthetization of limb joints. SPb.: Morsar AV, 2001:157. (In Russ.).
3. Vorontsova T. N. Socio-biological characteristics of patients who underwent hip joint endoprosthesis. Endoprosthetics in Russia : All-Russia. Monotem. Collection of scientific articles. Kazan; St. Petersburg. 2005:I:132‒136. (In Russ.).
4. Traumatism, orthopedic morbidity, the state of traumatologo-orthopedic aid to the population of Russia in 2020. M., CITO, 2021. (In Russ.).
5. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E. et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.
6. Culliton S. E., Bryant D. M., Overend T. J. et al. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:490–492.
7. Sammour T., Zargar-Shoshtari K., Bhat A. et al. A programme of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J. 2010;123:61–70.
8. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606‒617.
9. Neville A., Lee L., Antonescu I. et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101: 159–170.
10. Zhao D., Ma X.L., Wang W.L., Zhang L. Effectiveness evaluation between enhanced recovery after surgery and traditional treatment in unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;98:519–523.
11. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606‒617.
12. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Archives of Surgery. 2009;144(10):961‒9.
13. Jiang H. H., Jian X. F., Shangguan Y. F. et al. Effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients Older Than 65 Years. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(2):229‒235. DOI: 10.1111/os.12441.
14. Kim S., Losina E., Solomon D. H. et al. Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(1):69‒74.
15. Koneva E. S., Serebryakov A. B., Shapovalenko T. V., Lyadov K. V. Analysis of 5-year experience of the multidisciplinary team on the Fasttrack therapy protocol after total hip and knee joint replacement surgery in the clinic of the Federal State Autonomous Institution “Medical and Rehabilitation Center” of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2016;15(4):175‒182. (In Russ.).
16. Gomzhina E. A., Geraskov E. V., Ovsyankin A. V., Koryachkin V. A. Effectiveness of early postoperative rehabilitation in patients after primary total knee joint endoprosthesis depending on different techniques of postoperative analgesia. Russian Medical Journal. 2017;(13):953‒956. (In Russ.).
17. Sekirin A. B. Protocol for early rehabilitation after endoprosthesis of large joints (literature review). Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019;(2):51‒57. (In Russ.).
18. Shimarova O. V., Achkasov E. E., Timashkova G. V. Effectiveness and feasibility of different approaches to rehabilitation after knee joint endoprosthetics. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2019:96(3):64‒69. (In Russ.).
19. Mandalia V., Eyres K., Schranz P., Toms A. D. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(3): 265–271.
20. Holm B., Kristensen M. T., Bencke J. et al. Loss of knee-extension strength is related to knee swelling after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1770–1776.
21. Nikolaev N. S., Efimov A. V., Petrova R. V. et al. Management of patients in the post-operative period after the hip joint replacement accessed by low-invasive access. Physical and rehabilitation medicine, medical rehabilitation. 2019;4(4):32‒38. (In Russ.).
22. Ugraş A. A, Kural C., Kural A. et al. Which is more important after total knee arthroplasty: Local inflammatory response or systemic inflammatory response?. Knee. 2011;18(2):113–116.
23. Tikhilov R. M., Andreev D. V., Goncharov M. Yu, Shneider O. V. Comparative analysis of biochemical indices of muscle tissue alteration depending on the access in total hip arthroplasty. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2013;(1):37‒43. (In Russ.).
24. Grushina T. I., Teplyakov V. V., Lee Y. A. The first experience of including physical factors in fast-track surgery of patients with tumor lesions of bones. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2016;93(2‒2):69. (In Russ.).
25. Kurbanov S. Kh. Individual rehabilitation after hip joint endoprosthetics: Author’s thesis. ...Dr. of medical sciences. St. Petersburg, 2009:38. (In Russ.).
26. Abalevich A. I., Marochkov A. V., Abalevich O. M. Method of early rehabilitation and dynamics of cortisol content in blood serum in patients after knee joint endoprosthesis. Surgery. Eastern Europe. 2019; 8(2):162‒171. (In Russ.).
27. Dallari D., Fini M, Giavaresi G. et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic stimulation on patients undergoing hip revision prostheses: A randomized prospective double-blind study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:423–430.
28. Sineokiy A. D., Pliev D. G., Efimov N. N. et al. Comparative analysis of biochemical markers of tissue traumatization depending on the used surgical access in revision hip arthroplasty. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2020;(4):146. (In Russ.).
29. Matziolis D., Wassilew G., Strube P. et al. Differences in muscle trauma quantifiable in the laboratory between the minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal approach. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):651‒655.
30. Tsed A. N., Mushtin N. E., Dulaev A. K., Kozhevin A. A. Two-stage revision hip arthroplasty in a patient with periprosthetic fracture combined with deep paraprosthetic infection according to the Fast-Track protocol. Bulletin of Surgery named after I. I. Grekov. 2022;181(3):85‒90. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tsed A.N., Kozhevin A.A., Mushtin N.E. Current trends in early rehabilitation of patients after total hip and knee replacement. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2024;183(1):60-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-1-60-65
Views:
234
Email this article 