Modern concept of treatment of patients with ventral hernias
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-4-20-27
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The relevance of treating patients with hernias of the anterior abdominal wall is beyond doubt, since the incidence of the disease is on average 5 people per 1000, and hernioplasty itself is one of the most common operations in a general surgical hospital. However, the relapse rate remains quite high. There remains a debate about the choice of surgical option; the issues of prevention and treatment of pain syndrome, as well as tactics for managing patients with a complicated postoperative period, remain unresolved.
The OBJECTIVE was to evaluate the effectiveness of the modern concept of treating patients with ventral hernias and to substantiate the principles for choosing a hernioplasty technique.
METHODS AND MATERIALS. The study is based on the results of treatment of 1938 patients operated on at the Faculty Surgery Clinic named after S.P. Fedorov Military Medical Academy in the period from 2015 to 2022. Both open and endovideosurgical options for surgical interventions were performed for isolated umbilical hernias or in combination with diastasis of the rectus muscles, hernias of the white line of the abdomen, inguinal and postoperative hernias, including reduction of the volume of the abdominal cavity.
RESULTS. During the study, an algorithm for the treatment of patients with ventral hernias was developed, various options for perioperative pain relief were proposed, and the tactics for treating infectious and purulent complications were substantiated.
CONCLUSION. A specialized surgical hospital must perform all possible options for both traditional and endovideosurgical hernioplasty, use innovative options for pain relief in the perioperative period, and apply modern methods for diagnosing and treating postoperative complications in order to provide personalized medical care.
About the Authors
P. N. RomashchenkoRussian Federation
Romashchenko Pavel N., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery named after S. P. Fedorov
Saint Petersburg
Al. A. Kurygin
Russian Federation
Kurygin Aleksandr A., Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery named after S. P. Fedorov
Saint Petersburg
V. V. Semenov
Russian Federation
Semenov Valery V., Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Lieutenant Colonel of the Medical Service, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Faculty Surgery named after. S. P. Fedorov
6, Academika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044
S. A. Prudieva
Russian Federation
Prudyeva Sofya A., Surgeon of the Faculty of Surgery named after S. P. Fedorov
Saint Petersburg
A. A. Mamoshin
Russian Federation
Mamoshin Alexey A., Resident of the Surgical Department, Military Hospital
Krasnodar
References
1. Egiev V. N., Voskresensky P. K. Hernias. Moscow, Medpraktika, 2015:479.
2. Kurygin Al. A., Romashchenko P. N., Semenov V. V., Polushin S. Yu. Laparoscopic removal of a strangulated large umbilical hernia and white line hernia using the IPOM method // Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(4):73–75. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-4-73-75.
3. Semenov V.V., Kurygin A.A., Romashchenko P.N. et al. Endovideosurgical treatment of a patient with strangulated Amyand’s hernia // Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(2):112–114. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-112-114.
4. Bittner R., Montgomery M. A., Arregui E. et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia. International Endohernia Society // Surgical Endoscopy. 2015;29(2):289–321. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4156-3.
5. Ansari M. M. Surgical preperitoneal space: holy plane of dissection between transversalis fascia and preperitoneal fascia for TEPP inguinal hernioplasty // MOJ Surg. 2018;6(1):26–33. DOI: 10.15406/mojs.2018.06.00119.
6. Romashchenko P. N., Fomin N. F., Maistrenko N. A. et al. Topographicanatomical and clinical rationale for total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty // Endoscopic surgery. 2020;26(5):16–23. DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20202605116.
7. Belyanskу I., Daes J., Radu V. G. et al. A novel approach using the enhanced – view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair // Surgical Endoscopy. 2018;32(5):1525– 1532. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2.
8. Burdakov V.A., Zverev A.A., Makarov S.A. et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal approach in the treatment of patients with primary and postoperative ventral hernias // Endoscopic surgery. 2019;25(4):34–40. DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20192504134.
9. Shatalov V. I., Belolipetsky S. S., Strogonov A. I. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block for endovideosurgical hernioplasty of inguinal hernias // Bulletin of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2023;20(1):24–35. DOI: 10.24884/2078-5658-2023-20-1-24-35.
10. Romashchenko P. N., Kurygin A. A., Semenov V. V., Prud’eva S. A. Socio-economic aspects of treatment of patients with medium (W2) and large (W3) postoperative ventral hernias // Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2022;181(4):29–35. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2022-181-4-29-35.
11. Burdakov V. A., Zverev A. A., Makarov S. A. et al. Endoscopic posterior separation plasty in the treatment of patients with median postoperative hernias // Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2020;71(3):82–87. DOI: 10.17816/brmma50539.
12. Semenov V. V., Prud’eva S.A., Kurygin A.A. Infectious and inflammatory complications after endoscopic hernioplasty in patients with postoperative ventral hernias: features of diagnosis and treatment tactics // Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2021;23(3):157–164. DOI: 10.17816/brmma75485.
Review
For citations:
Romashchenko P.N., Kurygin A.A., Semenov V.V., Prudieva S.A., Mamoshin A.A. Modern concept of treatment of patients with ventral hernias. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2023;182(4):20-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2023-182-4-20-27