Preview

Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery

Advanced search

Historical paradigms in the treatment of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction

https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-5-110-118

Abstract

Adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity is an urgent and completely unresolved problem in modern surgery. The first mentions of intestinal obstruction have been known to history since ancient times. The first and fundamental stage in the study of adhesive disease is the empirical period, the beginning of which dates back to the 17th century. During this period, there was an unsystematic accumulation of knowledge; scientists and surgeons put forward theories and assumptions about the causes of adhesions. The next historical period in approaches to the treatment of patients with intestinal obstruction of adhesive origin is the period of active surgical tactics. With the increase in surgical activity in the heyday of surgery since the end of the 19th century, the increase in patients with adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity is inextricably linked, and as a result, a disease such as intestinal obstruction, the cause of which was intraperitoneal adhesions, became widespread. At the end of the 20th century, endovideosurgery became very popular and widespread in surgery. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis had a number of important advantages compared with open surgery. Thus, the next historical stage in the treatment of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction was the preference for laparoscopic surgical techniques. Currently, the surgical community is inclined to change the paradigm in the treatment of patients with adhesive disease, which consists of minimizing the surgical component in the treatment of patients in this group with an emphasis on a conservative approach, as well as paying attention to the prevention of adhesive disease. Currently, both in foreign and domestic literature, one can find a colossal amount of work on the search for new therapeutic and diagnostic techniques, the use of methods for preventing adhesions, and a comparative analysis of already known treatment algorithms. However, today there is no consensus on the tactics of managing patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction, which requires further study of the problem and finding ways to solve it.

About the Authors

B. V. Sigua
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Sigua Badri V., Dr. of Sci.(Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of General Surgery

Saint Petersburg



S. V. Klejmyuk
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Klejmyuk Sofya V., Assistant of the Department of General Surgery

Saint Petersburg



P. A. Kotkov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Kotkov Pavel A., Cand. of Sci.(Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery

Saint Petersburg



O. V. Fionik
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Russian Federation

Fionik Olga V., Dr. of Sci.(Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of General Surgery

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Adamyan L. V., Kozachenko A. V., Kondratovich L. M. Peritoneal adhesions: the history of researh, classification and pathogenesis (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2013;(6):7–13. (In Russ.).

2. Mimohod A. A., Znamenskiy A. A., Nikonov A. A. Atumor of the small intestine as a cause of intussusception in middl eage. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2017;6(58):18–27. (In Russ.).

3. Yamalova G. R. Acute adhesive intestinal obstruction: features of diagnosis and treatment: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. Ufa. 2022. (In Russ.).

4. Kondratovich L. M. The basics for comprehension of adhesive process formation in abdominal cavity. perioperative prevention by means of anti‐adhesive drugs (review of literature). Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2014;21(3):169–173. (In Russ.).

5. Khadjibaev F. A., Alidjanov F. B., Kurbonov A. B. Galstone ileus. The Bulletin of Emergency Medicine. 2019;12(5):98–104. (In Russ.).

6. Kurmanov R. А., Niyazov B. S., Chyngysheva Zh. А. et al. The significance and prevention of intra-abdominal hypertension in acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2022;8(7):293– 311. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/80/25.

7. Emel`yanov S. S. The role of refractometry and polarization microscopy methods in determining the tactics of treatment of patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: Dis. kand. med. nauk. Ekaterinburg. 2010. (In Russ.).

8. Sosnovskij E. A., Korenyuk V. A., Ral`ko M. A. et al. Spaechnaya bolezn`. Ispol`zovanie fizicheskix bar`erov v profilaktike spajkoobrazovaniya. Young Scientist. 2018;15(201):185–187. (In Russ.).

9. Chitanava Y. S., Doukhin A. O., Oparin I. S. Modern view on adhesion occurrence and it’s prophylaxis after surgical operations on pelvic organs. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2012;(5):525–531. (In Russ.).

10. Attard J. A., MacLean A. R. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2007;50(4):291–300.

11. Dobrovol’skij V. P. O bolezni, imenuemoj ileus. Saint Petersburg. 1838; VIII. 123 p. (In Russ.).

12. Mykyev K. M., Shakirova U. Sh. Invaginaciya kishechnika: metodicheskie rekomendacii dlya studentov pediatricheskogo i lechebnogo fakul’tetov. Bishkek. 2015. 24 p. (In Russ.).

13. Fakhradiev I. R., Almabaev Y. A., Eralieva L. T. et al. Intestinal anastomosis (review of literature). Vestnik KazNMU. 2018;(2):20–22. (In Russ.).

14. Filenko B. P., Zemlyanoy V. P., Kotkov P. A. Treatment and recurrence prevention of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. Herald of the Northwestern State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov. 2017;9(1):68–72. (In Russ.).

15. Aliyev S. A., Aliyev E. S. Nasointestinal intubation in surgery of acute intestinal obstruction and peritonitis: past, present and future. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(10):92–99. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.17116/hirurgia202110192.

16. Alkatout I., Mechler U., Mettler L. et al. The Development of Laparoscopy-A Historical Overview. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021;8(799442):1–12. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.799442.

17. Hat’kov I. E., Barsukov Yu. A., Atroshchenko A. O. et al. History of laparoscopic surgery. Onkologicheskaya koloproktologiya. 2012;(2):35–39. (In Russ.).

18. Mikhin I. V., Kukhtenko Yu. V., Doronin M. B. Cholecystectomy: evolution of laparoscopic approach. Endoscopic Surgery. 2015;21(1):42–60. (In Russ.).

19. Nazarenko A. A., Akimov V. P. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and prevention of abdominal adhesions by using mechanical barriers. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016;(8):83–85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/ hirurgia2016883-85.

20. Timerbulatov Sh. V., Sibaev V. M., Timerbulatov V. M. et al. Acute Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Comparative Analysis of Open and Laparoscopic Surgery. Creative surgery and oncology. 2022;12(1):35– 42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-1-35-42.

21. Bagnenko S. F., Sinenchenko G. I., Chupris V. G. Laparoscopic diagnostics and treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Vestnik khirurgii. 2009;168(1):27–30. (In Russ.).

22. Strizheletskiĭ V. V., Ryvkin A. Iu., Makarov S. A. et al. New possibilities in diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute adhesive bowel obstruction with the use of endovideosurgery. Endoscopic Surgery. 2011;17(3):7–10. (In Russ.).

23. Aliev S. A., Aliev É. S. Laparoscopic surgery of adhesive small intestine obstruction: opportunities and prospects. Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(2):58– 64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20202602158.

24. Gojayev A., Erkent M, Aydin H. O. et al. Is laparoscopic surgery safe and feasible in acute adhesive ileus? Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(34):e34894. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034894.

25. Hackenberg T., Mentula P., Leppäniemi A., Sallinen V. Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Acute Adhesive Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2017;106(1):28–33.

26. Fatehi Hassanabad A., Zarzycki A. N., Jeon K. et al. Prevention of Post-Operative Adhesions: A Comprehensive Review of Present and Emerging Strategies. Biomolecules. 2021;11(1027)1–42. https://doi. org/10.3390/biom11071027.

27. Davydova Yu. D., Fedorov A. A., Popov A. A. et al. Peritoneal adhesions in modern surgery. V. F. Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;11(1):17–24. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/2313-8726-2024-11-1-17-24.

28. Manannikova T. N., Popov A. A., Kolesnik N. A. et al. Treatment and prevention of adhesive process in tubarial infertility. Endoscopic Surgery. 2012;18(2):31–37. (In Russ.).

29. Hellebrekers B. W., Kooistra T. Pathogenesis of postoperative adhesion formation. British Journal of Surgery. 2011;98(11):1503–1516.

30. Sazhin A. V., Tyagunov A. E., Larichev S. E. et al. Optimal time of surgery for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3):24–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/ hirurgia2018324-30.

31. Kalandarova D. H. Modern features of diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute adhesive small intestinal obstruction: Dis. kand. med. nauk. Saint Petersburg. 2021. (In Russ.).

32. Larichev S. E., Shapovolyants S. G., Zavyalov B. G. et al. New approaches in conservative treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(6):45–53. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202106145.

33. Lier E. J., van den Beukel B. A. W., Gawria L. et al. Clinical adhesion score (CLAS): development of a novel clinical score for adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2021;35(5):2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07621-5.

34. Elsolh B., Nguyen M. A., Berger F. H. et al. Water-soluble contrast in the management of adhesive small-bowel obstruction: a Canadian centre’s experience with guideline development and implementation. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2022;65(5):E606–E613.

35. Raimov G. N. Modern aspects of prevention and treatment of patients with adhesive disease of the personal disease and its complications. Ekonomika i socium. 2021;11(90):1002–1014.

36. Anjum H., Bokhari S. G., Khan M. A. et al. Comparative efficacy of Prolene and Prolene-Vicryl composite mesh for experimental ventral hernia repair in dogs. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2016;17(2):78–83.

37. Filenko B. P., Zemlyanoj V. P., Borsak I. I., Ivanov A. S. Spaechnaya bolezn’: profilaktika i lechenie. Saint Petersburg. 2013. (In Russ.)

38. Armashov V. P., Matveev N. L., Makarov S. A. Existing and forwardlooking ways to prevent adhesions in IPOM hernia repair. A research overview. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(9):116–122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2020091116.

39. Rybakov K. D., Sednev G. S., Morozov A. M. et al. Prevention of the formation of adhesions in the abdominal cavity (literature review). Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2022;29(1):22–28. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.24412/1609-2163-2022-1-22-28.

40. Atta H. M. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;17(46.):5049–5058.


Supplementary files

1. Неозаглавлен
Subject
Type Other
Download (150KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Sigua B.V., Klejmyuk S.V., Kotkov P.A., Fionik O.V. Historical paradigms in the treatment of patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2025;184(5):110-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2025-184-5-110-118

Views: 21


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0042-4625 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7370 (Online)