PLASTY OF DURA MATER DEFECTS BY COLLAGEN IMPLANTS USING NON-SUTURE CONTACT DIRECT BONDING METHOD
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-70-76
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The study investigated and compared the efficacy of plasty of dura mater using different collagen materials in the experiment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The experimental study in vivo was carried out on 60 laboratory animals. Rabbits were divided into 4 groups after performing the craniotomy and dura mater opening. It depended on the material used for plasty of dural defects such as Duraform, Lyostypt and Russian prototype of collagen matrix for dural grafting. The fourth group was the control group. The presence and severity of meningo-cerebral adhesion, histological and immunological researches of duraplasty areas were performed after the experiment. RESULTS. The severity of meningo-cerebral adhesion was significantly higher in control group, but there wasn’t noted any meaningful difference in the groups with different collagen matrices. These groups had similar histological and immunohistochemical features. CONCLUSIONS. An application of collagen matrix improved the results of duraplasty and prevented formation of meningo-cerebral adhesions in the experiment. This data predict the high clinical efficacy of the method.
About the Authors
D. E. Alekseev
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Svistov
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. E. Matsko
St. Petersburg Clinical Research and Practical Centre of Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. D. Alekseev
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Акобян О. Р., Шулев Ю. А., Трофимова Т. Н. МРТ-оценка эволюции свободного жирового аутотрансплантата, применяемого в хирургии основания черепа // Мед. визуализация. 2005. № 3. С. 21-28.
2. Алексеев Д. Е., Алексеев Е. Д., Свистов Д. В. Сравнительный анализ способов пластики твёрдой мозговой оболочки при открытых операциях на головном мозге для профилактики послеоперационной ликвореи // Казанск. мед. журн. 2014. № 1. С. 45-49.
3. Ваза А. Ю., Файн А. М., Иванов П. А. и др. Анализ применения различных вариантов костной пластики у пострадавших с внутрисуставными переломами // Трансплантология. 2015. № 4. С. 6-12.
4. Лядов В. К., Шрайнер И. В., Головинский С. В. Опыт применения комбинированной анестезии препаратами «Золетил» и «Рометар» при проведении полостных операций на кроликах // Вопр. реконструкт. и пластич. хир. 2007. № 2. С. 29-30.
5. Самотокин Б. А. Ликворея и ликворные свищи при огнестрельных черепно-мозговых ранениях // Лечение огнестрельных ранений черепа и головного мозга. Л., 1944. С. 160-166.
6. Тихомиров С. Е., Цыбусов С. Н., Кравец Л. Я., Фраерман А. П., Балмасов А. А. Пластика дефектов свода черепа и твердой мозговой оболочки новым полимерным материалом Реперен // Совр. технол. в мед. 2010. № 2. С. 6-11.
7. Barth M., Tuettenberg J., Thomé C., Weiss C, Vajkoczy P, Schmiedek P. Watertight dural closure: is it necessary? A prospective randomized trial in patients with supratentorial craniotomies // Neurosurgery. 2008. Vol. 63, № 4. P. 352-358.
8. Berjano R., Vinas F. C., Dujovny M. A review of dural substitutes used in neurosurgery // Crit. Rev. Neurosur. 1999. Vol. 9, № 4. P. 217-222.
9. Esposito F., Cappabianca P., Fusco M. et al. Collagen-only biomatrix as a novel dural substitute: examination of the efficacy, safety and outcome: clinical experience on a series of 208 patients // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2008. Vol. 110, № 4. P. 343-351.
10. Gonzalez-Lopez P., Harput M. V., Türe H. Efficacy of placing a thin layer of gelatin sponge over the subdural space during dural closure in preventing meningo-cerebral adhesion // World Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 83, № 1. P. 93-101.
11. Hamzaoglu V., Ozalp H., Karkucak A., Cokluk C. Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura // J. Exper. Clin. Med. 2015. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 77-82.
12. Keener E. B. Regeneration of dural defects: a review // J. Neurosurg. 1959. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 415-423.
13. Kim H. L., Do J. Y., Cho H. J. et al. Dura mater graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: the first case in Korea // J. Korean Med. Sci. 2011. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 1515-1517.
14. Masullo C., Pocchiari M., Macchi G. et al. Transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by dural cadaveric graft // J. Neurosurg. 1989. Vol. 71, № 6. P. 954.
15. Morales-Avalos R., Soto-Dominguez A., Garcia-Juarez J. et al. Characterization and morphological comparison of human dura mater, temporalis fascia, and pericranium for the correct selection of an autograft in duraplasty procedures // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2016. May 13 [Epub ahead of print]. P. 1-10.
16. Narotam P. K., Jose S., Nathoo N. et al. Collagen matrix (DuraGen) in dural repair: analysis of a new modified technique // Spine. 2004. Vol. 29, № 24. P. 2861-2867.
17. Narotam P. K., Qiao F., Nathoo N. Collagen matrix duraplasty for posterior fossa surgery: evaluation of surgical technique in 52 adult patients: clinical article // J. Neurosurg. 2009. Vol. 111, № 2. P. 380-386.
18. Stendel R., Danne M., Fiss I. et al. Efficacy and safety of a collagen matrix for cranial and spinal dural reconstruction using different fixation techniques // J. Neurosurg. 2008. Vol. 109, № 2. P. 215-221.
19. Zerris V.A., James K. S., Roberts J. B. et al. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices // J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2007. Vol. 83, № 2. P. 580-588.
Review
For citations:
Alekseev D.E., Svistov D.V., Matsko D.E., Alekseev E.D. PLASTY OF DURA MATER DEFECTS BY COLLAGEN IMPLANTS USING NON-SUTURE CONTACT DIRECT BONDING METHOD. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(2):70-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-70-76
Views:
957
Email this article 