ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY OF ARTHROSCOPIC PLASTY TECHNOLOGIES OF ANTERIOR CRUCIFORM LIGAMENT OF KNEE JOINT BASED ON ANATOMICAL POSITION OF AUTOGRAFT
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-77-82
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The study compared the efficacy of anatomic and transtibial ACL (anterior cruciform ligament) reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The authors analyzed 586 operations at the period from 2010 to 2015. The anatomic ACL-R was performed in the first group of 289 patients (49,3 %). The transtibial ACL-R was carried out in the second group of 297 patients (50,7 %). RESULTS. The adverse outcomes were rarely observed in the first group (p<0,05), where IKDC-2000 and KOSS were applied. The knee stability was higher in the first group (p<0,05). The graft was often positioned vertically and it had signs of destruction in the second group. There was detected the bone tunnel enlargement (p<0,01) more frequently compared with the first group. The operation time was shortened (p<0,05) in the second group. CONCLUSIONS. The anatomic ACL-R allowed doctors to obtain some stability in the perfect and good results compared with the transtibial ACL-R.
About the Authors
V. V. Zayats
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. K. Dulaev
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University; I. I. Dzhanelidze St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Dydykin
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. N. Ul’Yanchenko
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Kolomoitsev
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Kovtun
I. P.Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Abebe E. S., Moorman C. T. 3rd, Dziedzic T. S., Spritzer C. E., Cothran R. L., Taylor D. C., Garrett W. E. Jr., DeFrate L. E. Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques // Amer. J. Sports Med. 2009. Vol. 37, № 10. P. 1904-1911.
2. Aglietti P., Zaccherotti G., Menchetti P. P. M., De Biase P. A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 1995. Vol. 3. Issue 1. P. 2-8.
3. Bernard M., Hertel P., Hornung H., Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL: Radiographic quadrant method // Amer. J. Knee Surg. 1997. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 14-21, discussion 21-22.
4. Bowers A. L., Bedi A., Lipman J. D., Potter H. G., Rodeo D. A., Pearle A. D., Warren R. F., Altchek D. W. Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using highresolution magnetic resonance imaging // Arthroscopy. 2011. Vol. 27, № 11. P. 1511-1522.
5. Chambat P. ACL tear // Orthopaedics & traumatology: surgery research. 2013. Vol. 99, № 1. Issue 1. P. 43-52.
6. Chen Y., Chua K. H., Singh A., Tan J. H., Chen X., Tan S. H., Tai B. C., Lingaraj K. Outcome of single-bundle hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the anteromedial versus the transtibial technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Arthroscopy. 2015. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 1784-1794.
7. Faizal Rayan, Shashi Kumar Nanjayan, Conal Quah Darryl Ramoutar, Sujith Konan, Rares S. Haddad. Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction // World J. Orthop. 2015. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 252-262.
8. Fineberg M. S., Zarins B., Sherman O. H. Practical considerations in anterior cruciate ligament replacement // Arthroscopy. 2000. Vol. 16, № 7. P. 715-724.
9. Harner C. D., Marks P. H., Fu F. H., Irrgang J. J., Silby M. B., Mengato R. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: endoscopic versus two-incision technique // Arthroscopy. 1994. Vol. 0, № 5. P. 502-512.
10. Inderhaug E., Larsen A., Strand T., Waaler P.A., Solheim E. The effect of feedback from post-operative 3D CT on placement of femoral tunnels in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction // Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 154-160.
11. Irrgang J. J., Anderson A. F., Boland A. L., Harner C. D., Kurosaka M., Neyret P., Richmond J. C., Shelborne K. D. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form // Amer. J. Sports Med. 2001. Vol. 29, № 5. P. 600-613.
12. Kiapour A. M., Murray M. M. Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair // Bone Joint Res. 2014. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 20-31.
13. Kim S.-J., Jung K.-A., Song D.-H. Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous quadriceps tendon // Arthroscopy. 2006. Vol. 22, № 7. P. 797.e1-797.e5.
14. Kyung B. S., Kim J. G., Chang M., Jang K. M., Lee S. S., Ahn J. H., Wang J. H. Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in graft obliquities that closely mimic the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy // Amer. J. Sports Med. 2013. Vol. 41, № 6. P. 1302-1309.
15. Robin B. N., Jani S. S., Marvil S. C., Reid J. B., Schillhammer C. K., Lubowitz J. H. Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review // Arthroscopy. 2015. Vol. 31, № 7. P. 1412-1417.
16. Roos E. M., Roos H. P., Ekdahl C., Lohmander L. S. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-validation of a Swedish version // Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 1998. Vol. 8, № 6. P. 439- 448.
17. Staubli H. U., Rauschning W. Tibial attachment area of the anterior cruciate ligament in the extended knee position: Anatomy and cryosections in vitro complemented by magnetic resonance arthrography in vivo // Knee Surg. Traumatol. Arthrosc. 1994. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 138-146.
18. Tegner Y., Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1985. Vol. 198. P. 43-49.
19. Wang H., Fleischli J. E., Hutchinson I. D., Zheng N. N. Knee moment and shear force are correlated with femoral tunnel orientation after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction // Amer. J. Sports Med. 2014. Vol. 42, № 10. P. 2377-2385.
20. Youm Y. S., Cho S. D., Lee S. H., Youn C. H. Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results // Amer. J. Sports Med. 2014. Vol. 42, № 12. P. 2941-2947.
Review
For citations:
Zayats V.V., Dulaev A.K., Dydykin A.V., Ul’Yanchenko I.N., Kolomoitsev A.V., Kovtun A.V. ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY OF ARTHROSCOPIC PLASTY TECHNOLOGIES OF ANTERIOR CRUCIFORM LIGAMENT OF KNEE JOINT BASED ON ANATOMICAL POSITION OF AUTOGRAFT. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(2):77-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-77-82
Views:
508
Email this article 