POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF COMBINED SURGERIES IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED FORMS OF COLON CANCER
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-86-94
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The authors investigated the peculiarities and character of complications in gerontological patients with disseminated forms of colon cancer after combined and extended operative interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective analysis of treatment results of 154 patients was made. The single-stage combined operations were performed on 32 patients of the first group with IV stage of colon cancer. The operation included removing of primary tumor and liver metastases. Combined and extended operative interventions were carried out on 122 patients of the second group with locally-advanced colorectal cancer (T3-4N1-3M0). The patients of both groups were divided into 2 subgroups according to the age: subgroup A - over 60 years of age, subgroup B - younger than 60. Comparison of parameters of postoperative period was made separately in each group between subgroups. RESULTS. There weren’t noted any reliable increase in rate of surgical complication in patients of elderly and senile age with disseminated forms of colon cancer after combined operations. These operations accompanied by high risk of development of functionally-somatic complications as a rule connected with decompensation of concurrent pathology. CONCLUSIONS. The authors recommend to make the careful assessment of general somatic status of gerontological patients with disseminated forms of colorectal cancer and apply the multidiscipline approach in order to balance on time the concurrent pathology after combined operations.
About the Authors
N. A. Maistrenko
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Khvatov
Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Sazonov
S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Каприн А. Д.,Старинский В. В.,Петрова Г. В.Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2014 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена. 2016. 250 с.
2. Куликов Е. П.,Бубликов И. Д.,Головкин Е. Ю.,Семионкин Е. И. Различные хирургические подходы к лечению больных распространенным раком толстой кишки // Онкохирургия. 2011. Т. 3, № 5. С. 29-32.
3. Майстренко Н. А., Хватов А. А., Сазонов А. А., Петров С. Н. Превентивная колостомия в плановом хирургическом лечении больных раком прямой кишки // Вестн. хир. 2015. № 4. С. 24-30.
4. Маркарьян Д. Р. Мультидисциплинарный подход к лечению колоректального рака у больных старческого возраста: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2012. 151 с.
5. Скипенко О. Г. Хирургия печени. М., 2016. 304 с.
6. Тулина И. А. Хирургическая тактика при местно-распространенном раке прямой кишки: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2010. 143 с.
7. Хрыков Г. Н., Фридман М. Х., Миллер А. Е., Мюхкюря Д. Ю. Современная реабилитация в хирургии рака толстой кишки у геронтологических больных в условиях многопрофильного стационара // Вестник Росс. Военно-мед. акад. (приложение). 2014. Т. 46, № 2. С. 401.
8. Черданцев Д. В., Поздняков А. А., Шпак В. В. и др. Несостоятельность колоректального анастомоза: Современное состояние проблемы (обзор литературы) // Колопроктология. 2015. № 4. С. 57-62.
9. Audisio R. A., Papamichael D. Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients // Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012. Vol. 9, № 12. P. 716-725.
10. Derici H., Unalp H. R., Kamer E. et al. Multivisceral resections for locally advanced rectal cancer // Colorectal Dis. 2008. Vol. 10, № 5. P. 453-459.
11. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cogort of 6336 patients and results of a survey // Ann. Surg. 2004. Vol. 240. P. 205-213.
12. Ferlay J., Shin H. R., Bray F. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v. 2/0. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IAR CancerBase No 10. (электронный ресурс: http: // globocan.iarc.fr)
13. Hammond J., Lim S., Wan Y. The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2014. № 6. P. 1176-1185.
14. Larsen S. G., Wiig J. N., Tretli S. et al. Surgery and preoperative irradiation for locally advanced or reccurent rectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age // Colorectal Dis. 2006. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 177-185.
15. Lehnert T., Methner M., Polloc A. et al. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients // Ann. Surg. 2002. Vol. 235, № 2. P. 217-225.
16. Lopez M. J. Multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer // J. Surg. Oncol. 2001. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 1-5.
17. Mayo S. C., Pulitano C., Marques H. Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a multicenter international analysis // J. Amer. Coll. Surg. 2013. Vol. 216. P. 707-716.
18. Nakafusa Y., Tanaka T., Tanaka M. et al. Comparison of multi-visceral resection and standard operation for locally advanced colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcome // Dis. Colon. Rectum. 2004. Vol. 47, № 12. P. 2055-2063.
Review
For citations:
Maistrenko N.A., Khvatov A.A., Sazonov A.A. POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF COMBINED SURGERIES IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED FORMS OF COLON CANCER. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2017;176(2):86-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-2-86-94
Views:
8236
Email this article 