NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE UPPER EXTREMITIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MULTIPLE AND POLYTRAUMA
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-5-46-51
Abstract
A comparative analysis of treatment results of fractures of long bones of the upper extremities was made in 172 victims with severe polytrauma. The traditional strategy of treatment was used in the first group. The new technologies such as prognostic tactics, method of Damage control orthopedics and low-invasive osteosynthesis developed by the authors were applied in the second group. The application of new technologies allowed doctors to improve the immediate and long-term results of surgery. The rate of lethality decreased in 1,6 times, incidence of complications reduced in 1,4 times. Hospital stay shortened in 2 times: for victims with favorable prognosis - on 7 days; for patients with unfavorable prognosis - on 13 days. The long-term results were studied in 154 (89,5%) patients. The common duration of treatment reduced on 30 days and the quantity of good results increased on 18,6%. The number of patients with vocational rehabilitation increased from 82,3 to 90,7%.
About the Authors
E. K. Gumanenko
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Khromov
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Linnik
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kh. N. Nazarov
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Chapurin
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. O. Kucheev
I. I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Tashev
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гуманенко Е. К., Бояринцев В. В., Супрун Т. Ю. Методология объектив ной оценки тяжести травм (Часть III. Оценка тяжести состояния раненых и пострадавших) // Вестн. хир. 1997. № 4. С. 10-15.
2. Гуманенко Е. К., Лебедев В. Ф. Общая стратегия оказания медицинской помощи пострадавшим и новые технологии в лечении политравм // Политравма: травматическая болезнь, дисфункция иммунной системы, современная стратегия лечения / Под ред. Е. К. Гуманенко, В. К. Козлова. М.: ГЭОТАРМедиа, 2008. С. 313-408.
3. Гуманенко Е. К., Самохвалов И. М., Завражнов А. А. Тактика запрограммированного многоэтапного хирургического лечения (ЗМХЛ) ранений и травм («damage control») // Военнополевая хирургия локальных войн и вооружённых конфликтов: Руководство для врачей / Под ред. Е. К. Гуманенко, И. М. Самохвалова. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011. С. 148-157.
4. Лазарев А. Ф., Солод Э. И., Лазарев А. А. Возможности и принципы малоинвазивного остеосинтеза при лечении переломов костей // Вестн. травматол. и ортопед. 2011. № 2. С. 5-11.
5. Неверов В. А., Хромов А. А., Черняев С. Н. Функциональный метод лечения переломов длинных трубчатых костей - блокированный интрамедуллярный остеосинтез // Вестн. хир. 2007. № 1. С. 25-29.
6. Неверов В. А., Хромов А. А., Черняев С. Н. и др. Лечение метафизарных переломов костей голени методом блокирующего остеосинтеза // Вестн. хир. 2008. № 1. С. 43-47.
7. Соколов В. А. Множественные и сочетанные травмы. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2006. С. 10-66.
8. Хромов А. А., Линник С. А., Кравцов А. Г. и др. Малоинвазивный остеосинтез у больных с переломами плечевой кости // Клин. больница. 2012. № 2-3. С. 96-99.
9. Baker S. P., O’Neill B., Haddon W. Long W. B. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care //J. Trauma. 1974. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 187-196.
10. D’Alleyrand J. C., O’Toole R. V. The evolution of damage control orthopedics: current evidence and practical applications of early appropriate care // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2013. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 499-507.
11. Kucukdurmaz F., Alijanipour P. Current concepts in orthopedic management of multiple trauma // Open Orthop. J. 2015. Vol. 31, № 7. P. 275-282.
12. Logan C., Hess A., Kwon J. Y. Damage control orthopedics: variability of construct design for external fixation of the lower extremity and implications on cost // Injury. 2015. Vol. 46, № 8. P. 1533-1538.
13. Mathieu L., Bertani A., Gaillard Cю et al. Surgical management of combat-related upper extremity injuries // Chir. Main. 2014. Vol. 33, № 3. P. 174-182.
14. Matuszewski P. E., Kim T. W., Gay A. N., Mehta S. Acute operative management of humeral shaft fractures: analysis of the national trauma data bank // Orthopedics. 2015. Vol. 38, № 6. P. 485-489.
15. Nahm N. J., Moore T.A., Vallier H. A. Use of two grading systems in determining risks associated with timing of fracture fixation // J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014. Vol. 77, № 2. P. 268-279.
16. Pape H. C., Giannoudis P., Krettek C. The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery // Am. J. Surg. 2002. Vol. 186, № 6. P. 622-629.
17. Sír M., Pleva L., Procházka V. Multiple trauma - treatment of skeletal injuries with damage control orthopedics // Rozhl. Chir. 2014. Vol. 93, № 5. P. 287-291.
Review
For citations:
Gumanenko E.K., Khromov A.A., Linnik S.A., Nazarov Kh.N., Chapurin V.A., Kucheev I.O., Tashev A.A. NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE UPPER EXTREMITIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MULTIPLE AND POLYTRAUMA. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2016;175(5):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-5-46-51
Views:
487
Email this article 