Endocrine predictors of testicular biopsy efficacy in patients with azoospermia

OBJECTIVE. The study identified predictors of endocrine detection of sperm in case of open testicular biopsy in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The research was based on the results of examination and testicular biopsy of 76 patients with secretory azoospermia aged from 20 to 55 years old. The instrumental, laboratory, physical methods of research were carried out for all the patients before performing of the open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction. Hormone levels were determined in blood plasma such as luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, total and free testosterone, estradiol and sex steroid binding globulin. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of patients (n =43) whom sperms were found in testicular biopsies. The second group included patients (n = 33) whom sperms weren’t detected. RESULTS. Сonсentration of follicle stimulating hormone in blood plasma was the most significant hormone predictor. It was found that follicle stimulating hormone level between 12 and 16 IU/L indicated to the low probability of sperm presence in testicular biopsies and in case it was less than 17 IU/L the probability was extremely low. There was also established that elevated follicle stimulating hormone levels in patients older than 26 years pointed to the low probability of finding sperm using open testicular sperm extraction. CONCLUSIONS. Increase of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone or their correlation in blood plasma indicates to a low probability of finding sperm by open testicular sperm extraction. The concentrations of testosterone, sex steroid binding globulin, prolactin and estradiol in the blood plasma weren’t reliable predictors of finding sperm in testicular biopsies.

infertility, azoospermia, follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction, age

1. Аль-Шукри С. Х., Боровец С. Ю., Торопов В. А. и др. Частота обнаружения сперматозоидов и вероятность осложнений после различных видов биопсии яичка (TESA, TESE и micro-TESE) у больных необструктивной азооспермией // Ученые записки. 2016. Т. XXIII, № 1. С. 10-14.

2. Витязева И. И. Современные подходы к лечению азооспермии методом микро-ТЕСЕ в программе ЭКО/ИКСИИ : Обзор литературы. Ч. II // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2013. Т. 59, № 5. С. 47-60.

3. Гамидов С. И., Попова А. Ю., Овчинников Р. И. Необструктивная азооспермия - клинические рекомендации // Русский медицинский. журнал. 2015. № 11. С. 595-601.

4. Типисова Е. В., Киприянова К. Е. Динамика возрастных изменений концентраций гормонов в сыворотке крови у мужчин пожилого и старческого возраста г. Архангельска // Известия Самарского научного центра РАН. 2014. Т. 16, № 5. С. 805-808.

5. Aziz N. The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia // Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. Vol. 68, № 1. P. 35-38.

6. Bettella A., Ferlin A., Menegazzo M. et al. Testicular fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic tool in non-obstructive azoospermia // Asian J. Andrology. 2005. Vol. 7. P. 289-294.

7. Bhasin S., de Kretser D. M., Baker H. W. Clinical review 64: pathophysiology and natural history of male infertility // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1994. Vol. 79. P. 1525-1529.

8. Esteves S. C., Agarwai A. The azoospermic male : current knowledge and future perspectives // Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. Vol. 68. P. 1-4.

9. Ezeh U. I., Moore H. D., Cooke I. D. A prospective study of multiple needle biopsies versus a single open biopsy for testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia // Human Reproduction. 1998. Vol. 13. P. 3075-3080.

10. Friedler S., Raziel A., Strassburger D. et al. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia // Human Reproduction. 1997. Vol. 12. P. 1488-1493.

11. Gudeloglu A., Parekattil S. J. Update in the evaluation of the azoospermic male // Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. Vol. 68. P. 27-34.

12. Hauser R., Yogev L., Paz G. et al. Comparison of efficacy of two techniques for testicular sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia : multifocal testicular sperm extraction versus multifocal testicular sperm aspiration // J. andrology. 2006. Vol. 27. P. 28-33.

13. Hung A. J., King P., Schlegel P. N. Uniform testicular maturation arrest: a unique subset of men with nonobstructive azoospermia // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178. P. 608-612.

14. Nowroozi M. R., Ahmadi H., Ayati M. et al. Testicular fine-needle aspiration versus testicular open biopsy: comparable sperm retrieval rate in selected patients // Indian J. Urol. 2012. Vol. 28. P. 37.

15. Rosenlund B., Kvist U., Ploen L. et al. A comparison between open and percutaneous needle biopsies in men with azoospermia // Human Reproduction 1998. Vol. 13. P. 1266-1271.

16. Schoor R. A., Elhanbly S., Niederberger C. S., Ross L. S. The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 167. P. 197-200.

17. Strain G., Zumoff B., Rosner W., Pi-Sunyer X. The relationship between serum levels of insulin and sex hormone-binding globulin in men: the effect of weight loss // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1994. Vol. 79. P. 1173-1176.

18. Tournaye H. Surgical sperm recovery for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: which method is to be preferred? // Human Reproduction. 1999. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 71-81.