SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF NAVIGATED TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR PREOPERATIVE MOTOR MAPPING IN PATIENTS WITH BRAIN TUMORS
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-3-10-13
Abstract
The objective is to assess the safety of motor mapping using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) in patients with brain tumors based on the literature data and own observations.
Material and methods. The motor mapping with the help of navigated TMS was performed in 114 patients with supratentorial brain tumors. Side effects and complications, such as seizures, pain, hearing and cognitive changes during and after the procedure, were analyzed.
Results. 101 (90.4 %) patients did not notice any discomfort during the study. There was not any cases of seizures during and after the procedure. 11 (9.6 %) patients experienced discomfort, 8 (72.3 %) patients of them noticed a slight headache.
Conclusion. Navigated TMS is well tolerated in neurosurgical patients with tumors of the motor cortex.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Shcherbuk
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution Saint-Petersburg clinical scientific and practice center for specialized types medical care (oncological); Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. E. Eroshenko
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution Saint-Petersburg clinical scientific and practice center for specialized types medical care (oncological); Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. A. Shcherbuk
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Shcherbuk А. Yu., Eroshenko M. E., Shcherbuk Yu. А. Kompleksnoe primenenie vysokotekhnologichnykh metodov nejrokhirurgicheskogo lecheniya bol’nykh s opukholyami motornoj zony kory golovnogo mozga: uchebnoe posobie. SPb., 2016. 112 p.
2. Frey D., Schilt V., Strack S. et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the treatment outcome in patients with brain tumors in motor eloquent locations // Neuro-Oncol. 2014. Vol. 16, № 10. P. 1365–1372.
3. Krieg S. M., Sabih J., Bulubasova L. et al. Preoperative motor mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation improves outcome for motor eloquent lesions // Neuro-Oncol. 2014. Vol. 16, № 9. P. 1274–1282.
4. Krieg S. M., Shiban E., Buchmann N. et al. Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas // J. Neurosurg. 2012. Vol. 116, № 5. P. 994–1001.
5. Ottenhausen M., Krieg S. M., Meyer D. et al. Functional preoperative and intraoperative mapping and monitoring : increasing safety and efficacy in glioma surgery // Neurosurg. Focus. 2015. Vol. 38, № 1. P. E3.
6. Tarapore P. E., Tate M. C., Findlay A. M. et al. Preoperative multimodal motor mapping : a comparison of magnetoencephalography imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation // J. Neurosurg. 2012. Vol. 117, № 2. P. 354–362.
7. Takahashi S., Vajkoczy P., Picht T. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the motor cortex in patients with rolandic brain tumors // Neurosurg. Focus. 2013. Vol. 34, № 4. P. E3.
8. Picht T., Mularski S., Kuehn B.e t al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative functional diagnostics in brain tumor surgery // Neurosurgery. 2009. Vol. 65, suppl. 6. P. 93–98.
9. Barker A. T., Jalinous R., Freeston I. L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex // Lancet. 1985. Vol. 1, № 8437. P. 1106–1107.
10. Rossi S., Hallett M., Rossini P.M., Pascual-Leone A. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009. Vol. 120, № 12. P. 2008-2039.
11. Wassermann E. M. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation : report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation // Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998. Vol 108, № 1. P. 1–16.
12. Loo C. K., Mc Farquhar T. F., Mitchell P. B. A review of the safety of repetitive transcranialmagnetic stimulation as a clinical treatment for depression // Int. J. Neuropsychopharm. 2008. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 131–147.
13. Counter S. A., Borg E. Analysis of the coil generated impulse noise in extracranial magnetic stimulation // Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992. Vol. 85, № 4. P. 280–288.
14. Rossini P. M., Barker A. T., Berardelli A. et al. Noninvasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots : basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee // Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994. Vol. 91, № 2. P. 79–92.
15. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and epilepsy / C. A. Tassinari, M. Cincotta, G. Zaccara, R. Michelucci // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003. Vol. 114, № 5. P. 777–798.
16. Schrader L. M., Stern J. M., Koski L. et al. Seizure incidence during single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals with epilepsy // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004. Vol. 115, № 12. P. 2728–2737.
17. Tarapore T. E., Thomas P., Lucia B. et al. Safety and tolerability of na vigated TMS for preoperative mapping in neurosurgical patients // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2016. Vol. 127, № 3. P. 1895–1900.
Review
For citations:
Shcherbuk A.Yu., Eroshenko M.E., Shcherbuk Yu.A. SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF NAVIGATED TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR PREOPERATIVE MOTOR MAPPING IN PATIENTS WITH BRAIN TUMORS. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(3):10-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-3-10-13
Views:
645
Email this article 