ONCE AGAIN ON THE ISSUE OF ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-4-86-88
Abstract
Almost every operation on the abdomen ends with drainage. However, according to the data of foreign publications, surgeons all over the world refuse this technique increasingly. Based on the data of domestic and foreign publications, the indications and the need for abdominal drainage in various types of surgical interventions were analyzed.
About the Authors
V. P. Zemlyanoy
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
B. V. Sigua
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
B. P. Filenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
N. I. Glushkov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
A. A. Kurkov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
V. A. Ignatenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov»
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg.
References
1. Sopuev A. A., Akmatov T. A., Sydykov N. Zh. et al. K voprosu o drenirovanii bryushnoi polosti posle operatsii na distalnykh otdelakh ZHKT // Vestnik KGMA im. I. K. Akhunbaeva. 2017. № 1. P. 83–85.
2. Shevchenko U. L., Stoiko U. M., Zubritskii V. F. et al. Neobkhodimo li drenirovanie bryushnoi polosti pri peritonite. Novyi vzglyad na staruyu problemu // Vestnik Natsionalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Tsentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2012. Vol. 7, № 3. P. 11–14.
3. Shelygin U. A., Achkasov S. I., Shakhmatov D. G. Vsegda li nuzhno drenirovat’ bryushnuyu polost posle planovykh koloproktologicheskikh operatsii? // Annaly khirurgii. 2012. № 5. P. 45–47.
4. Broome A. E., Hansson L. C., Tyger J. F. Effi ciency of various types drainage of the peritoneal cavity – an experimental study in man // Acta Chir. Scand. 1983. № 149. P. 53–55.
5. Petrowsky H., Demartines N., Rousson V. et al. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery : a systematic review and meta-analyses // Ann. Surg. 2004. Vol. 240. P. 1074–1084.
6. Fedorov V. D., Gostishchev V. K., Ermolov A. S. et al. Sovremennye predstavleniya o klassifikatsii peritonita i sistemakh otsenki tyazhesti sostoyaniya bolnykh // Khirurgiya. 2000. № 2. P. 58–62.
7. Nursal T. Z., Yildirim S., Tarim A. et al. Effect of drainage on postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain after // Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2003. № 388. P. 95–100.
8. Wasey N., Baughan J., de Gara C. J. Prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery : the cost of ignoring the evidence // Can. J. Surg. 2003. Vol. 46, № 4. P. 279–284.
9. Posleoperatsionnyi peritonit kak prichina smerti / N. G. Kharkevich, V. I. Petukhov, T. N. Isachenko, T. I. Yagovdik // Novosti khirurgii. 1998. № 2. P. 116.
10. Dominguez E. P., Giammar D., Baumert J. et al. Prospective study of bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis // Am. Surg. 2006. Vol. 72. P. 265–268.
11. Lewis R. T., Goodall R. G., Marien B. et al. Simple elective cholecystectomy : to drain or not // Am. J. Surg. 1990. Vol. 159. P. 241–245.
12. Lee Y. J., Leung K. L., Lai P. B. S. et al. Selection of patients for laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer // Brit. J. Surg. 2001. № 88. P. 133–136.
13. Urbach D. R., Kennedy E. D., Cohen M. M. Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage : a systematic review and metaanalysis // Ann. Surg. 1999. № 229. P. 174–180.
14. Karliczek A., Jesus E. C., Matos D. et al. Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis // Colorectal. Dis. 2006. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 259–265.
15. Merad F., Yahchouchi E., Hay J. M. et al. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis : a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Associations for Surgical Research // Arch. Surg. 1998. Vol. 133, № 3. P. 309–314.
16. Rotstein O. D., Meakins J. L. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections // World J. Surg. 1999. Vol. 14. P. 159–166.
Review
For citations:
Zemlyanoy V.P., Sigua B.V., Filenko B.P., Glushkov N.I., Kurkov A.A., Ignatenko V.A. ONCE AGAIN ON THE ISSUE OF ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(4):86-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-4-86-88
Views:
1049
Email this article 