Diagnostic features of artificial pyoinflammatory diseases of soft tissues
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-31-35
Abstract
The objective of the article is to discuss diagnostic peculiarities of artificial pyoinflammatory diseases of soft tissues (APIDST).
Material and methods. We analyzed the clinical data of 302 military men.
Results. As compared to the non-artificial pyoinflammatory diseases of soft tissues of level 2-4 (PIDST of level 2-4), APIDST are characterized by the presence of local self-induced skin injuries that are mostly located on shins, the crepitation during palpation in the projection of the abnormal focus, and the signs of anaerobic infection (86.1%) and cellular-fascia-myositis (57.6%) during the surgical intervention in the lesion.
Conclusion. The revealed clinical features of pathology should be taken into account in the treatment.
About the Authors
A. N. Koval
Federal State Institution №301 «Military Clinical Hospital №301», of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. V. Tashkinov
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. G. Melkonian
Federal State Institution №301 «Military Clinical Hospital №301», of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. Yu. Marochko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
B. M. Kogut
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. I. Boiarintsev
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Ianovoi
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Amur State Medical Academy», of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. M. Kosenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Far-Eastern State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Kolkutin V. V., Sosedko Yu. I. Sudebnomedicinskaya ehkspertiza pri podozrenii na chlenovreditel’stvo i simulyaciyu. M. : Yurlitinform, 2004. 167 p. (In Russ.).
2. Melkonyan G. G., Koval’ A. N., Tashkinov N. V., Kulikova N.A. Klinicheskie osobennosti iskusstvennykh gnojno-vospalitel’nyh zabolevanij myagkih tkanej, iniciirovannykh naibolee chasto primenyaemymi nesteril’nymi biologicheskimi zhidkostyami. Dal’nevostochnyi medicinskii zhurnal. 2017. № 2. P. 68–71. (In Russ.).
3. Fliege H., Grimm M. A., Eckhardt-Henn A. et al. Frequency of ICD-10 factitious disorder : survey of senior hospital consultants and physicians in private practice // Psychosomatics. 2007. Vol. 48. P. 60–64.
4. Maldonado J. R. When patients deceive doctors : a review of Factitious Disorders // Am. J. of Forensic Psychiatry. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 29–58.
5. Uçmak D., Harman M., Akkurt Z. M. Dermatitis artefacta : a retrospective analysis // Cutan. Ocul. Toxic. 2014. Vol. 33. P. 22–27.
6. Eckhardt-Henn A. Artifizielle Störungen // Uexküll. Psychosomatische Medizin, theoretische Modelle und klinische Praxis, 7. Aufl. Urban& Fischer, München, 2011. P. 631–640.
7. Smulevich A. B., L’vov A. N., Ivanov O. L. Patomimii: psihopatologiya autoagressii v dermatologicheskoj praktike. M.: MIA, 2012. 160 p. (In Russ.).
8. Bass C., Halligan P. Factitious disorders and malingering : challenges for clinical assessment and management // Lancet. 2014. Vol. 19. P. 1422–1432.
9. Kenedi C. A., Shirey K. G., Hoffa M. et al. Laboratory diagnosis of factitious disorder : a systematic review of tools useful in the diagnosis of Munchausen’s syndrome // N. Z. Med. J. 2011. Vol. 124. P. 66–81.
10. Svetuhin A. M., ZHukov A. YU., Bulova T. V. Iskusstvenno vyzvannye gnojnye zabolevaniya. Khirurgiya. 1996. № 6. P. 69–72. (In Russ.).
11. Werdin F. The phenomenon of covert self-mutilation in the surgical routine // Chirurg. 2016. Vol. 87. P. 29–35.
12. Yates G. P., Yates M. A., Feldman M. D. Factitious disorder : a systematic review of 455 cases in the professional literature // Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2016. Vol. 41. P. 20–28.
Review
For citations:
Koval A.N., Tashkinov N.V., Melkonian G.G., Marochko A.Yu., Kogut B.M., Boiarintsev N.I., Ianovoi V.V., Kosenko P.M. Diagnostic features of artificial pyoinflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(6):31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-31-35
Views:
760
Email this article 