Total cement knee arthroplasty in patients of 85–95 years old with terminal stage of degenerative knee disease
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-49-53
Abstract
The objective of the study is to make the analysis of the results of total cement knee arthroplasty in the most difficult age group of 85–95 years old patients.
Material and methods. 40 patients with terminal knee arthrosis were selected based on their comorbidity.
Results. Patients with the Charlson comorbidity index of 5–8 points need hospitalization for the treatment of aggravating somatic pathology, as preparation for a future knee arthroplasty. In the operated patients, the result on the KOOS was (76±7.19), and on the WOMAC was (151±4.83) a year after the arthroplasty.
Сonclusion. Surgical intervention – total knee arthroplasty in patients of 85–95 years old is possible only if its risk is minimized.
About the Authors
V. Yu. Murylev
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University); State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. M. Elizarov
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University); State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Muzychenkov
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University); State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ya. A. Rukin
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University).
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Dering
State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. A. Kukovenko
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University); State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. S. Alekseev
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University).
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. G. Rubin
State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare «City Clinical Hospital named after S. P. Botkin», Moscow center for bone and joint arthroplasty.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Tsygankov V. A., Djarcova S. L. Klassifikatsya i sistematizatsya trudosposobnogo naseleniya po vozrastnim gruppam. Omskii nautchnii vestnik. 2009. Vol. 4, № 79. P. 67–70. (In Russ.)
2. Tikhilov R. M., Vorontsova T. N., Tchernii F. G., Luthaninov S. S. Sostoyanie travmatizma i ortopeditcheskoi zabolevaemosti vzroslogo naselenia Sankt-Peterburga. 2009-–011gg. i rabota travmatologo-ortopedicheskoi slujbi goroda. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2012. Vol. 4, № 66. P. 110–120. (In Russ.)
3. Kuperman E. F., Schweizer M., Joy P. et al. The effects of advanced age on primary total knee arthroplasty : ametaanaysis and systematic review // BMC Geriatr. 2016. Vol. 16, № 41. P. 1–8. DOI 10.1186/s12877-016-0215-4.
4. Laskin R. S. Total knee replacement in patients older than 85 years // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999. Vol. 367. P. 43–49.
5. Pagnano M. W., Mclamb L., Trousdale R. T. Total knee arthroplasty for patients 90 years of age and older // Clin. orthopaedics and related research. 2004. Vol. 2, № 418. Р. 179–183.
6. Cram P., Lu X., Kates S. L. et al. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries 1991–2010 // J.A.M.A. 2012. Vol. 308, № 12. Р. 1227–1236.
7. Caporali R., Cimmino М. А., Sarzi-Puttini P. et al. Сomorbid conditions in the AMICA study patients : effects on the quality of life and drug prescriptions by general practitioners and specialists // Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2005. Vol. 35, № 1. Р. 31–37.
8. Kadam U. Т., Jordan K., Craft P. R. Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis : a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Walls // Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004. Vol. 63. P. 408–414.
9. Khitrov N. A.,Tsurko V. V., Malysheva A. N. Zabolevaemost, polovaya i vozrastnaya struktura osteoartroza. Klinitcheskaya gerontologia. 2001. Vol. 7, № 8. P. 64–65. (In Russ.)
10. Munoz E., Rosner F., Friedman R. et al. Financial risk, hospital cost, complications and comorbidities in medical non-complications and comorbidity-stratified diagnosis-related groups // Am. J. Med. 1988. Vol. 84, № 5. Р. 933–939.
11. Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L. et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies : development and validation // J. Chron. Dis. 1987. Vol. 40. P. 373–383.
12. Gorbatenko A. I., Alabut A. V., Sikilinda V. D. i dr. Sposob vibora taktiki pri endoprotezirovanii kolennogo sustava u patsientov s soputstvuychimi zabolevaniyami: patent RF № 2524146. 27.07.2014. Bull. № 21. (In Russ.)
13. Baker P. N., Van der Meulen J. H., Lewsey J. et al. National Joint Registry for England and Wales The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales // J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br). 2007. Vol. 89, № 7. P. 893–900.
14. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty / R. L. Kane, K. J. Saleh, T. J. Wilt, B. Bershadsky // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005. Vol. 8, № 8. Р. 1719–1724.
15. Skou S. T., Roos E. M., Laursen M. B. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement // N. Engl. J. Med. 2015. Vol. 373, № 17. Р. 1597–1606.
16. Brander V. A., Malhotra S., Jet J. et al. Outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty in persons aged 80 years and older // Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. 1997. № 345. Р. 67–78.
17. Zicat B., Rorabeck C. H., Bourne R. B. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in the octogenarian // J. Arthroplasty. 1993. Vol. 8, № 4. Р. 395–400.
Review
For citations:
Murylev V.Yu., Elizarov P.M., Muzychenkov A.V., Rukin Ya.A., Dering A.A., Kukovenko G.A., Alekseev S.S., Rubin G.G. Total cement knee arthroplasty in patients of 85–95 years old with terminal stage of degenerative knee disease. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(6):49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-49-53
Views:
629
Email this article 