Carotid artery surgery: 25 years of experience in the Leningrad region
https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-59-62
Abstract
The objective of the study is to evaluate the results and compare the methods of different variants of surgical treatment for the occlusive-stenotic lesion in extracranial parts of the carotid arteries.
Material and methods. Comparative analysis of immediate and remote results, and evaluation of patency after 450 carotid endarterectomy performed by classic and eversion technique.
Results. A significant advantage of eversion carotid endarterectomy was confirmed.
Conclusion. The good results show not only the high qualification of each operating surgeon as well the entire staff, providing competent logistics and selection of patients for both planned and emergency surgical interventions.
About the Authors
K. M. GrinevRussian Federation
K. M. Vakhitov
Russian Federation
P. A. Vladimirov
Russian Federation
I. S. Cherniakov
Russian Federation
K. A. Karlov
Russian Federation
A. Iu. Vinokurov
Russian Federation
S. O. Vazhenin
Russian Federation
L. G. Zaslavskii
Russian Federation
N. V. Zukovskaia
Russian Federation
A. A. Syrovatskii
Russian Federation
References
1. Bogousslavsky J., Van M. G., Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry : analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke // Stroke. 1988. № 19. P. 1083–1092.
2. Dambinova S. А., Khunteev G. A., Olson D. A. et al. NR2 peptide indicates transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke // Int. J. Stroke. 2008. Vol. 3. Р. 153–154.
3. Fergusson G. G., Eliasziw M., Barr H. W. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : Surgical results in 1415 patients // Stroke. 1999. Vol. 30. P. 1751–1758.
4. Burakovski V. I., Bokeria L. A. Serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgia. Khronicheskaya ischemia golovnogo mozga. M.: Medicina, 1989. P. 608–655. (In Russ.)
5. Pokrovski A.V. Mozno li izbezat ishemicheskogo insulta s pomoshiu sosudistoi operacii?. Khirurgia. 2003. № 3. P. 26–29. (In Russ.)
6. Skvortcova V. I., Stahovskaya L. V. Epidemiologia ishemicheskogo insulta v Rossiiskoi federacii. Nevrologia. 2005. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 1–6. (In Russ.)
7. Bokeria L. A., Gudkova R. G. Serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgia. 2010: Bolezni i vrozdennie anomalii sistemi krovoobrashenia. M.: NCSSH im. A. N. Bakuleva, RAMN, 2010. 192 p. (In Russ.)
8. Erofeev A. A., Kitachev K. V., Hubulava G. G., Dudanov I. P., Sokurenko G. U., Urchenko D. L. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie stenozov sonnikh arterii. Medicinski akademicheski zhurnal. 2010. № 3. P. 37–44. (In Russ.)
9. Pokrovski A. V. Nacionalnie rekomendacii po vedeniu pacientov s zabolevaniyami brahiocephalnih arteri. Angiologia i sosudistaya khirurgia. 2013. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 5–68. (In Russ.)
10. Hackam D. G. Combining Multiple Approaches for the Secondary Prevention of Vascular Events After Stroke. A Quantitative Modeling Study // Stroke. 2007. Vol. 38. P. 1881–1885.
11. Vereshagin N. V. Geterogennost insulta: vzgliad s pozicii klinicista. Zhurnal nevrologii I psihiatrii im S. S. Korsakova. 2003. № 9. Pril. P. 8–10. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Grinev K.M., Vakhitov K.M., Vladimirov P.A., Cherniakov I.S., Karlov K.A., Vinokurov A.I., Vazhenin S.O., Zaslavskii L.G., Zukovskaia N.V., Syrovatskii A.A. Carotid artery surgery: 25 years of experience in the Leningrad region. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(6):59-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-6-59-62